that other apps may need users/groups created _before_ the
compilation and/or post-install runs?
-- Hisham
-- Forwarded message --
From: Viola Zoltán <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Jan 7, 2008 6:01 PM
Subject: [gobolinux-users] error in installing of thttpd
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
e try removing it in yours and check if your
favorite terminal still works and apps launch in color.
-- Hisham
___
gobolinux-devel mailing list
gobolinux-devel@lists.gobolinux.org
http://lists.gobolinux.org/mailman/listinfo/gobolinux-devel
On Jan 9, 2008 1:26 PM, Daniele Maccari <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hisham wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I plan to pack a Scripts release this week, so if anybody has any
> > pending commits or works in progress, let me know.
> >
> > Also, I'm pla
an to replace /System/Links with a FUSE-based filesystem
which can present to each process a different view of the links tree,
showing them links that match the required dependencies of the
process. There is prototype code for it written, showing it can be
done, but it's a big change
uble.
Name changes can be handled by CompatibilityList when needed, but are
usually not needed for end-user applications.
> It's more the above situations,
> or other non-renamings like Qt(3 vs. 4) that cause trouble...
Dependency ranges "Qt >= 3, < 4" can alrea
m collecting the coverage around the internet?
(No, I'm not volunteering to scavenge the net and do it ;) ). I don't
know.
In any case, it's always great to get press. It has caused some nice
post-release sub-peaks in our counter graph:
http://webstats.motigo.com/s?tab=1&link=1&a
Weird. Please keep an eye of this, and if you can find a recipe that
triggers this behavior every time it's built, let me know.
-- Hisham
On Jan 13, 2008 9:50 PM, Giambattista Bloisi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Giambattista Bloisi wrote:
> > All,
> > it
ogress of 014.b. This is even more pressing because of
> the opportunity we have to get pressed CDs.
>
> A draft agenda can be found here: http://gobo.kundor.org/wiki/014.b_Meeting
I'll be there!
-- Hisham
back in the fold
___
g
For
> 015, we could have an image that runs under lguest. Please discuss
> this on IRC and provide feedback.
As mentioned in the IRC metting, simpler is better. I'd prefer using ftp.
> SVN migration. This requires changes in BuildLiveCD tools. Hopefully
> these changes won't take too long to implement or cause other
> regressions.
Yes. I can look at that later in the week unless someone beats me to it.
-- Hisham
___
gobolinux-devel mailing list
gobolinux-devel@lists.gobolinux.org
http://lists.gobolinux.org/mailman/listinfo/gobolinux-devel
ay/ -type d -name CVS | xargs rm -rf
> + find $package/$today/ -type d -name SVN | xargs rm -rf
I believe this should be "-name .svn" too.
-- Hisham
___
gobolinux-devel mailing list
gobolinux-devel@lists.gobolinux.org
http://lists.goboli
On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 3:05 AM, Carlo Calica <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 3/17/08, Carlo Calica <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 3/17/08, Carlo Calica <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On 3/17/08, Hisham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
ed a hacky wait to the
boot scripts to ensure that eth0 is p when network starts...).
-- Hisham
___
gobolinux-devel mailing list
gobolinux-devel@lists.gobolinux.org
http://lists.gobolinux.org/mailman/listinfo/gobolinux-devel
On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 7:06 PM, Michael Homer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 8:24 PM, Hisham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > (BTW, http://www.gobolinux.org/cgi-bin/viewvc.cgi is running ViewVC on
> > the tools/ dir. I had this installat
On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 8:53 PM, Carlo Calica <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 3/18/08, Hisham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 7:06 PM, Michael Homer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
>
> > > As well, having had a chance to read
On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 8:53 PM, Carlo Calica <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 3/18/08, Hisham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 7:06 PM, Michael Homer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
>
> > > As well, having had a chance to read
Hi,
I notice the "014.b" name is gaining traction. I strongly suggest to
use a more obvious name, such as "014.1". The "b" can be confused as
meanining "beta".
-- Hisham
___
gobolinux-devel mailing list
Thanks for the cleanup. Everything seems to be working okay. :)
-- Hisham
On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 1:50 PM, Nick Matteo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This concerns those of you who have a login for [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> The home directory was kind of a mess, since it was also the
d directly, also:
> Add_Option_Entry "m" "make" "Use the given variant of make (ie:
> cmake). Use in recipe_type={makefile,configure}" "ColorMake"
Nice catch -- applied.
> I'm not sure if this is intentional (or important), but in
Ok. I'll wait until our mirrors catch up and then I'll post the
announcements in the website.
-- Hisham
On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 6:53 AM, Carlo Calica <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Due to a small error on the iso, I've rereleased it. the new md5sum is:
>
> c4
reading .zshrc
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]
Yes, but -ls turn on "login shell", so that's why .zprofile was read, isn't it?
-- Hisham
___
gobolinux-devel mailing list
gobolinux-devel@lists.gobolinux.org
http://lists.gobolinux.org/mailman/listinfo/gobolinux-devel
On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 9:23 PM, Jonatan Liljedahl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hisham wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 8:44 PM, Jonatan Liljedahl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >> At least mine *does* read zprofile in interactive shells: I put echo
>
On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 8:09 AM, MJ Ray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hisham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Ok. I'll wait until our mirrors catch up and then I'll post the
> > announcements in the website.
>
> Small reminder: mirrors.ttllp.co.uk (tranq
r BuildDependencies file.
> >
> There's also an expression in RecipeLint that is in perl, so I guess it's
> still
> needed.
Perl is part of the LFS base. I don't know which recipes we have
depend implicitly on Perl because of that (some configure scripts out
ls.
Why do we need LZMA-Utils?
The fact that your new archiving scripts support them is not a strong
enough reason, since Atool supports a bunch of archive formats which
we never added to the base dependencies.
-- Hisham
___
gobolinux-deve
, but all the proposed variations just lighten the cumbersomeness
in a syntactic manner. The problem is not the size of each entry but
the number of entries and the implied maintenance issues. I find the
approach Michael described in his original post to be a good
compromise. And the $with_* variables sch
On Sat, Apr 12, 2008 at 2:16 PM, Daniele Maccari <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hisham wrote:
> > On Sat, Apr 12, 2008 at 11:01 AM, Daniele Maccari <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >
> >> Jonatan Liljedahl wrote:
> >> > Or something like th
etting
> mangled by the shell. The other options available are: @#%^&|/ - if
> one of them would be better I can change it, but I don't really see
> it.
Any of those (except # perhaps) would be better, because ";" really
implies 'line separator
Keeping the name is also a way of giving
credit to Gentoo. I don't consider the name misleading because of
these implementation details.
Perhaps the best thing to do would be to:
* disallow global negative flags in configuration files altogether.
* have the
sted in the same place that hosts
lists.gobolinux.org? It could probably stay there if it is. We could
just setup a proper subdomain/subdir.
> > The release needs to wait until this is setup.
Or we can make a release and just hold ContributeRecipe to the next
release (which can be as soon as a week later, if needed).
-- Hisham
___
gobolinux-devel mailing list
gobolinux-devel@lists.gobolinux.org
http://lists.gobolinux.org/mailman/listinfo/gobolinux-devel
refix the variable name with CNF_ to make
> it more obvious to know where it comes from.
I'd avoid variable names LIKE_THIS. I checked at
http://gobo.kundor.org/wiki/Guidelines_for_script_authors
and it says nothing about "public global variables" for the users
environment, but we've been using the "gobo" prefix in those cases.
-- Hisham
___
gobolinux-devel mailing list
gobolinux-devel@lists.gobolinux.org
http://lists.gobolinux.org/mailman/listinfo/gobolinux-devel
cipes), so that a user can write "VimAddonManager
autofold"
And a feature suggestion:
* Perhaps an attempt to install an addon that's not installed in
/Programs could trigger an attempt to InstallPackage or Compile it, or
at least give instructions (something l
d be to try a simple 'touch' before resource
> consuming actions (that might fail) like Unpack_Archive.
>
> I don't know when I will be able to work on this and Michael said that
> he wont be able to work on this in the close future, so this is a
>
i get access to the sources and they are either python or php i can
> implement the support for that?
>
> let me know if it's an option for you.
Thanks, I'll contact you offlist with the details.
-- Hisham
___
gobolinux-devel ma
>> +cp /etc/resolv.conf $root/$settingsdir/resolv.conf
> >> +cp /etc/hosts $root/$settingsdir/hosts
> >
> > Which recipes are demanding that?
> >
> Glibc 2.8 which needs to checkout "ports" module from cvs as Compile
> doesn't support multiple cvs repos/modules.
Let's fix Compile instead.
-- Hisham
___
gobolinux-devel mailing list
gobolinux-devel@lists.gobolinux.org
http://lists.gobolinux.org/mailman/listinfo/gobolinux-devel
On Fri, May 2, 2008 at 4:22 PM, Hisham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, May 2, 2008 at 1:40 PM, Jonas Karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Fri, 02 May 2008 18:17:13 +0200, Lucas C. Villa Real <[EMAIL
> PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > On Fr
y itself
Why is this so? This breaks env files with multi-line entries (e.g.
the Lua Environment file for Lua).
-- Hisham
___
gobolinux-devel mailing list
gobolinux-devel@lists.gobolinux.org
http://lists.gobolinux.org/mailman/listinfo/gobolinux-devel
On Mon, May 5, 2008 at 5:59 PM, Jonas Karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 05 May 2008 22:03:27 +0200, Lucas C. Villa Real <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> > On Mon, May 5, 2008 at 4:58 PM, Hisham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> On Mon, M
es were added.
OTOH, littering the code with Compile version checks could get ugly
fast.
-- Hisham
___
gobolinux-devel mailing list
gobolinux-devel@lists.gobolinux.org
http://lists.gobolinux.org/mailman/listinfo/gobolinux-devel
roblem too.
...and the change in the FileHash version. Does anyone have anything
currently "pending" in the Scripts codebase that would hold a quick
release?
-- Hisham
___
gobolinux-devel mailing list
gobolinux-devel@lists.gobolinux.org
http://lists.gobolinux.org/mailman/listinfo/gobolinux-devel
On Fri, May 9, 2008 at 4:16 PM, Jonas Karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 09 May 2008 21:00:01 +0200, Hisham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> On Fri, May 9, 2008 at 6:17 AM, Michael Homer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> On Fri, May 9, 2008
re most often the smell of ugly hacks that typically should done
in other places (such as fixing configure.ac and adding the
declarative rule to rebuild configure, which is way less likely to
break between upstream releases).
-- Hisham
___
gobolinux-devel mailing list
gobolinux-devel@lists.gobolinux.org
http://lists.gobolinux.org/mailman/listinfo/gobolinux-devel
t? Are there recipes using that yet?
Well, technically the difference is that those variables are only
exported to the cmake call. I don't really remember if it does make a
difference. Know of a good way to search for cmake_variables uses in
recipes without downloading the enti
On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 1:44 AM, Lucas C. Villa Real
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 1:16 AM, Hisham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 1:01 AM, Lucas C. Villa Real
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Hi,
>
On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 2:17 AM, Michael Homer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 2:15 PM, Hisham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > On Sun, May 11, 2008 at 5:42 AM, Michael Homer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Sun, May
ckage Scripts 2.9.1' to get the latest package.
Thanks for everyone's feedback,
-- Hisham
ChangeLog:
Scripts 2.9.1
2008-05-12 09:47 mwh
* Functions/CommandNotFound: Function definitions should be skipped
for CNF as well
2008-05-11 10:51 mohjive
ent behavior is "good enough" for now. Rootless is really aimed
for the "you know what you're doing" crowd, anyway.
-- Hisham
___
gobolinux-devel mailing list
gobolinux-devel@lists.gobolinux.org
http://lists.gobolinux.org/mailman/listinfo/gobolinux-devel
cal sourced from
> Bootup) Any thoughts about carrying this over to other places it
> makes sense?
Also: for conf files, a local conf file in ~/Settings/Scripts takes
precedence over the one in /System/Settings/Scripts. (It (currently)
does not read both, though.)
-- Hisham
_
be.
The newer versions should do that; I updated the hashfile format so
that versioning info is included, so it fails properly when it finds a
new version it can't handle. Old versions of course as not that smart,
but those should fade away over time.
-- Hisham
___
gobolinux-devel mailing list
gobolinux-devel@lists.gobolinux.org
http://lists.gobolinux.org/mailman/listinfo/gobolinux-devel
't always up to date and even might have security issues.
> We need to add version information to our packages, any idea on a good
> scheme for that?
Yes, we just need to add the full path to the FileHash file entries.
If they are tampered with, FileHash.sig will alert. Fix committed to
On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 1:01 PM, Jonas Karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 11 Jul 2008 16:37:51 +0200, Hisham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 3:43 AM, Jonas Karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> There has been a proof
On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 3:56 PM, Jonas Karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 11 Jul 2008 20:27:15 +0200, Hisham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 1:01 PM, Jonas Karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> On Fri, 11 Jul 2008 1
therefore one doesn't know the prefix. So using the path,
> partly or full can break things.
> If this is accepted I'll revert Hisham's commit and make a release. If
> this is rejected, I'd love to have a new discussion about best approach,
> then make a new
Setting time..."Fork 'ntpdate' Wait
'network' ntpdate pool.ntp.org
Exec "VMWare modules and network setup..."Fork 'vmware' Wait
'network' StartTask vmware &
I suppose the network hack
behaviour, but does anybody else have any thoughts?
> This is with a Scripts release in mind sometime in the not-too-distant
> future.
Sounds reasonable.
-- Hisham
___
gobolinux-devel mailing list
gobolinux-devel@lists.gobolinux.org
http://lists.gobolinux.org/mailman/listinfo/gobolinux-devel
t for
some packages (eg, in the Qt recipe) would be fine, but not for every
package. I'm also not sure about the behavior of hardlinks when you
pack a tarball for a binary package (I'm guessing they duplicate by
default, keep that in mind).
-- Hisham
___
gobolinux-devel mailing list
gobolinux-devel@lists.gobolinux.org
http://lists.gobolinux.org/mailman/listinfo/gobolinux-devel
and "gui" generic flags).
> Say that we, in addition to the above generic set, have "iii: bbb jjj
> kkk", what will be the effect of "+foo -bbb +iii"? Will +foo set +ccc
> (as "bbb" is removed from the selection) and +iii set +bbb (as +iii
> was spe
ptional Tcl/Tk GUIs being built from any recipe I compile. OTOH,
when I build aMSN, which has a Tcl/Tk GUI, I want that built on the
basis that Tcl/Tk is a mandatory dependency for it, and therefore it
should not be conditioned to a flag in the recipe. As long as these
scenarios are maintained, I
t;> basis that Tcl/Tk is a mandatory dependency for it, and therefore it
>> should not be conditioned to a flag in the recipe.
> If a recipe flags a mandatory dependency, that recipe is broken. That
> shouldn't ever be a problem so long as we're paying attention in what goes
> into the store.
Good, looks like everyone agrees on this second part :)
-- Hisham
___
gobolinux-devel mailing list
gobolinux-devel@lists.gobolinux.org
http://lists.gobolinux.org/mailman/listinfo/gobolinux-devel
On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 4:29 PM, Hisham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My main concern is that the answer for scenario 1 is "no".
I may have phrased this badly. What I meant is:
I only want to make sure that the answer for scenario 1 is "no" (ie,
generic flags set by
nqueror-3 and /bin/konqueror-4 wouldn't work at the same
time). That's an important point to keep in mind. That's good
motivation to add versioned executables only in specific, needed,
known-to-work cases.
-- Hisham
___
gobolinux-devel
h
as plugin-based apps) be happy with /S/I.
Also (in a typical anti-dogmatic version), while we're at it, why not
use /usr instead of /System/Index? I know what I wrote in the "I am
not clueless" article, but even then my only strong argument against
it was that it required union filesystems which were not widely
available back then.
-- Hisham
___
gobolinux-devel mailing list
gobolinux-devel@lists.gobolinux.org
http://lists.gobolinux.org/mailman/listinfo/gobolinux-devel
-> /Data/Compile: not much to think of.
> /Files/ChrootCompile -> /Data/ChrootCompile: same here.
I think it would be easier to everybody if /Data simply mapped /var,
with things such as /Data/log, /Data/spool, etc. The lowercase names
are the only downside to it, but the practical upsides
#x27;ll get some PHP
> errors displayed. Try
> http://gobolinux.org/index.php?lang=en_US&page=news&id=6
> to see what i mean.
Thank you for the report - it's now fixed!
-- Hisham
___
gobolinux-devel mailing list
gobolinux-devel@lists.g
thing like
this is a great way to get both exposure and some clear goals to the
project, as well (a number of GoboLinux releases were strongly
influenced by the FISL deadlines). Count on me to help any way I can.
Kudos for the initiative,
-- Hisham
___
gobolinux-devel mailing list
gobolinux-devel@lists.gobolinux.org
http://lists.gobolinux.org/mailman/listinfo/gobolinux-devel
agnostic solution -- with very little change, each of them
could be a whole abstract for two different talks. :)
-- Hisham
___
gobolinux-devel mailing list
gobolinux-devel@lists.gobolinux.org
http://lists.gobolinux.org/mailman/listinfo/gobolinux-devel
On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 2:27 AM, Michael Homer wrote:
> On Tuesday 21 July 2009 15:03:25 Hisham wrote:
>> I really liked it. How long is the abstract supposed to be, is there a
>> word/character limit?
> 500 words. It's about twice that now.
Ok.
>> In terms o
announcements. :)
-- Hisham
___
gobolinux-devel mailing list
gobolinux-devel@lists.gobolinux.org
http://lists.gobolinux.org/mailman/listinfo/gobolinux-devel
009-11-02 00:31:35 -0800 (Mon, 02 Nov 2009)
>> >> New Revision: 4110
>> >>
>> >> Added:
>> >> trunk/Scripts/bin/Alien-LuaRocks
>> >> Log:
>> >> Add Alien-LuaRocks script, implementing the Aliens interface.
As an update to this th
On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 1:58 AM, Michael Homer wrote:
> Anybody who's interested in making a wrapper should either post here or
> contact me directly so we don't get too much duplication of effort.
I'm working on CPAN support.
-- Hisham
On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 7:13 PM, Hisham wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 1:58 AM, Michael Homer wrote:
>> Anybody who's interested in making a wrapper should either post here or
>> contact me directly so we don't get too much duplication of effort.
>
> I'm wo
a problem with the recipe, or am I missing something?
-- Hisham
___
gobolinux-devel mailing list
gobolinux-devel@lists.gobolinux.org
http://lists.gobolinux.org/mailman/listinfo/gobolinux-devel
uot;$1" programpath
>> while read path
>> do
>> Programs_To_System_Path "${path}"
>> done < <(find "${programpath}" -mindepth 2 )
>> }
>>
>> and with Hisham help I fixed it with:
>>
>> function Get_System_
s of /lib/hal
inside /lib/hal/scripts in order to 'StartTask hal' to work.
So, that's the sequence:
cd /lib/hal/scripts
ln -nfs ../* .
mkdir -p /Programs/HAL/Settings/hal/fdi/preprobe
StartTask messagebus
StartTask hal
-- Hisham
__
On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 6:28 PM, Fábio Mierlo wrote:
> Hi,
>
> someone can commit the follow patch for FindDependencies in Scritpts packages?
>
> Actually Cygwin do not need this ifdef.
The patch is missing from your email, please resend.
Thank
.gobolinux.org/tools/trunk/Lua-GoboLinux/
I believe this project is abandoned, but it's a start.
I'm now going to post a news item in the website about GoboWing. :)
Cheers!
-- Hisham
___
gobolinux-devel mailing list
gobolinux-devel@
only bit in StartRootless that's conditionally generated is setting
$goboPrefix, and that line could be added to the user's profile script
when adding the line that sources StartRootless.
-- Hisham
___
gobolinux-devel mailing list
gobolinux-devel@lists.gobolinux.org
http://lists.gobolinux.org/mailman/listinfo/gobolinux-devel
On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 3:35 PM, Hisham wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 5, 2010 at 8:54 PM, Fábio Mierlo wrote:
>> Enjoy!
>>
>> http://gobo.kundor.org/wiki/Update_Kernel_on_014.01_LiveCD_Howto
>
> Wow, thanks!
>
> And to think I just spent a lot of time doing exactly that
case both have the same version number, then I guess
asking the user which to pick sounds like a reasonable behavior.
-- Hisham
___
gobolinux-devel mailing list
gobolinux-devel@lists.gobolinux.org
http://lists.gobolinux.org/mailman/listinfo/gobolinux-devel
age yet (views
have to be generated by hand using "find -ls" and I'm hardcoding the
detection of contexts). Anyway, I'll upload it tomorrow as is. My
plans are to keep working on this to make it more generally usable,
because from what
On 04/11/2010, Hisham wrote:
> The viewfs code itself is in a very "prototypical" stage yet (views
> have to be generated by hand using "find -ls" and I'm hardcoding the
> detection of contexts). Anyway, I'll upload it tomorrow as is. My
> plans a
kundor.org over the years -- it has been
extremely helpful.
Cheers,
-- Hisham
On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 8:09 PM, Kosh Linux Admin wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
> We have 3 dedicated servers (the planet & hostdime) and 2 unlimited
> webhosting at Host Monster and Dream Host and will be happy if c
On Sat, Mar 5, 2011 at 2:13 AM, Nick Matteo wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 7:01 PM, Hisham wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Thanks for the offer. Gobolinux.org is currently hosted at Dreamhost,
>> so we can probably setup a Mediawiki installation there without much
>> hassle
cable? Kudos to the kundor setup that has served so well
> thus far but nothing puts a user off a distro like a server not found
Yes, that's something to keep in mind as a general guideline, indeed.
We'll avoid referring to mirror addresses explicitly. André's upda
2011/3/24 Endre Kollár :
> I ported the UnionSandbox feature to stow(the distribution and recipe
> independent package manager)
Interesting. Nice minimalistic implementation. :)
-- Hisham
___
gobolinux-devel mailing list
gobolinux
On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 5:30 PM, kenneth marken wrote:
> On 24. mars 2011 21:23, Hisham wrote:
>>
>> 2011/3/24 Endre Kollár:
>>>
>>> I ported the UnionSandbox feature to stow(the distribution and recipe
>>> independent package manager)
>>
where all development happens now and
> the Grub series that was on the 014 CD is completely unsupported, but
> the installer relies on the configuration file used in the old series,
> which doesn't work now. I think we may be best off using a patched
> Grub 0.97, like the recipe t
On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 6:35 PM, Lucas C. Villa Real
wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 1:33 PM, Hisham wrote:
>> On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 1:16 AM, Michael Homer wrote:
>>> On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 12:13 PM, Leandro Motta Barros
>>> wrote:
>>>> Hello!
system
updated in a manner similar to what Leandro described. With a more
updated/standard system in place, I'll be able to help some more. If
you can allocate some time to work on GRUB, you'd probably get it done
faster than me.
--
-- Hisham
http://hisham.hm/ - http://colorbleed.com.br/
_
few
GoboLinux mentions there too). Nice to see some sanity reaching other
distros. :) They are going to keep the legacy symlinks (and will
probably do so for a good while).
-- Hisham
___
gobolinux-devel mailing list
gobolinux-devel@lists.gobolinux.org
http://lists.gobolinux.org/mailman/listinfo/gobolinux-devel
velopers
like me don't have the time/focus/energy to work on it anymore. Still,
we're always keeping the doors open to whoever would like to join the
Gobo community and work on the project.
Cheers!
-- Hisham
http://hisham.hm/
__
oboLinux installable/updatable again.
I keep thinking about getting back to it. Taking the Linux from
Scratch book and building a new, very barebones version from scratch
again. But I know I won't have the time/focus to do this until at
least December. After that, who knows...
-- Hisham
_
hould suffice. I think I
have 90% of what's needed to get a full distro up at this point, but
I'm not interested in focusing my efforts on it before 013 x86 is out.
Then we could shift to PPC full throttle. It's probably the best
approach to take because the development tools that&
On 3/10/06, Rafael Jeffman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 3/10/06, Hisham Muhammad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I don't think we need to use cross-compiling for PPC. ChrootCompiling
> > off Debian or my current GoboLinux PPC setup should suffice. I think I
> &
if [ ! "$override_default_options" = "yes" ]
> >
>
> Commited, thanks.
Slow down, cowboy!
There's *something* broken in the scons world. The recipe for the
latest official release (0.96.1) contains a scons -> scons.py sed. The
installed script is called scons.p
idea on how to fix this? Maybe adding
> System/Variable/tmp to the list of places on which writes are allowed?
Writes are "allowed" everywhere during install, but they are caught
later as errors (as they should). Why is this package "creating" a
/S/V/tmp d
ox), comment out "rm -rf $sandbox_rw"
> and "rmdir $sandbox_mp" and check to contents of those. Maybe check
> the output of $result, "make install" might not be returning 0.
I explicitly made it fail when leftover files are found, so that we
can differ between
On 3/17/06, Lucas Correia Villa Real <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 3/17/06, Hisham Muhammad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 3/17/06, Lucas Correia Villa Real <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Does anyone have any idea on how to fix this? Maybe adding
>
> Recipe types?
The code for each recipe type is fairly cleanly separated (albeit with
some ugly code duplication) but a full modularization is something
that is being planned for the future as well. It's not hard to add new
recipe types but there is no extensibility API at this point yet.
--
"problem" with kernel modules
> and the likes.
Actually, you can do this now, but it's not pretty (in both senses):
sandbox_options=(
--add-allowed /dir/foo:/dir/bar
)
The problem with this of course is that when you uninstall packages,
garbage is left behind, but I
On 3/20/06, Jonas Karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 24 Jan 2006 16:59:59 +0100, Hisham Muhammad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> > On 1/24/06, Jonas Karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Just as a sidenote, I used this functionallity t
1 - 100 of 471 matches
Mail list logo
