Hi,
Any example on how I can build cgo code using custom toolchain?
Thanks,
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"golang-nuts" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to
I noticed the following:
package main
func main() {
x := float64(1 << 3) // fine (constant expression)
v := uint(3)
x = float64(1 << v) // invalid operation: 1 << uint(v) (shift of type
float64)
_ = x
}
(playground: https://play.golang.org/p/xMhEvyMw0wg)
It's clear from the spec why the
What's the rationale for omission of:
fmt.Error(a ...interface{}) error
Given that other fmt functions come in that variety?
I realize it can be achieved like this, but so can fmt.Errorf
errors.New(fmt.Sprint(...))
Would a proposal to add it be entertained?
Happy New Year to all :-)
--
On Saturday, December 29, 2018 at 10:02:55 PM UTC-6, Andrey Savchuk wrote:
>
> I'm a beginner in Golang and quite confusing about using packages in a
> program. For example, every non simple software has a bunch of classes and
> interfaces or utility classes which are usually lokated in
since the libwebp has released the version 1.0.0, so it's time to port it
to pure golang
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"golang-nuts" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to
I need a project to motivate myself into writing some non-trivial go. So I
want to learn about implementing control theory, sensors, etc. Things like
IMU (gyro, 3D magnetic compass, and accelerometer) GPS. Not only do I want
to talk to the sensors, but I want to implement Kalman filters, PID
oops! typo:
https://play.golang.org/p/VYo9GTz63Hc
On Sat, Dec 29, 2018 at 8:47 PM Michael Jones
wrote:
> Never use a cannon as a fly swatter.
> A regular expression is heavy artillery.
> A for-loop will do just fine: smaller, simpler, faster, land ess
> dependencies:
>
>
Never use a cannon as a fly swatter.
A regular expression is heavy artillery.
A for-loop will do just fine: smaller, simpler, faster, land ess
dependencies:
https://play.golang.org/p/2nr4VdkqaNF
On Sat, Dec 29, 2018 at 8:17 PM Matt Harden wrote:
> I don't believe the regexp package allows
I don't believe the regexp package allows matching of bytes rather than
utf-8 sequences.
On Sat, Dec 15, 2018 at 3:05 AM Tamás Gulácsi wrote:
> For such a simple match, I'd use two bytes.Index with an if in a for cycle.
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
This will then work for me
Thanks very much Tamas
On Saturday, December 29, 2018 at 8:53:46 PM UTC+5:30, Tamás Gulácsi wrote:
>
> resp.Body is already an io.Reader, sou you can read it in chunks as you
> wish.
>
> 2018. december 29., szombat 12:09:56 UTC+1 időpontban Abhijit Desai a
>
It appears that this is due to the browser not knowing that the
downloaded file is UTF-8; adding to the page
fixes the problem.
So this is not a Go / "net/http" issue.
On Sun, 2018-12-30 at 11:05 +1030, Dan Kortschak wrote:
> I am putting together a tiny tool to archive the go.science G+ group
I'm a beginner in Golang and quite confusing about using packages in a
program. For example, every non simple software has a bunch of classes and
interfaces or utility classes which are usually lokated in different
packages in the same program. So using them in Java fo example makes no
*What algorithm using Rfc2898DeriveBytes*
On Sunday, October 11, 2015 at 2:36:23 PM UTC+5:30, Skip wrote:
>
> i'm guessing iteration and/or hash function doesn't match. however, i'm
> not an expert; hopefully someone with first hand experience with pbkdf1
> will comment.
>
> if this is for a
I am putting together a tiny tool to archive the go.science G+ group
for future archeology. However, I have run into an issue that I don't
understand and so don't know how to fix.
The code is here: https://play.golang.org/p/1vVm5dvVueS
This takes in a the Takeout JSON for the community's posts
Recursion often, iteration *very* often, closure with care and conscious
effort.
Higher order functions? Generate and execute all the time, passing and
using functions a bit less.
R, I and H are easy to reason about, you see. C takes due care.
--dave
--
You received this message because you
On Sun, Dec 30, 2018 at 5:07 AM 伊藤和也 wrote:
> How often do you use closure, recursion and higher-order functions?
>
I use closuresquite often, and recusion here and there as needed.
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "golang-nuts" group.
> To
How often do you use closure, recursion and higher-order functions?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"golang-nuts" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For
resp.Body is already an io.Reader, sou you can read it in chunks as you
wish.
2018. december 29., szombat 12:09:56 UTC+1 időpontban Abhijit Desai a
következőt írta:
>
>
> Not xml decoder... I mean want to capture stream chunk/parts when part
> data arrived at web server
> Don't want to wait to
Not xml decoder... I mean want to capture stream chunk/parts when part data
arrived at web server
Don't want to wait to receive entire file/request and then process rather
want to process whatever comes in
Thanks for the reply
On Saturday, December 29, 2018 at 3:24:54 PM UTC+5:30, Tamás
Yes, use xml.NewDecoder(r.Br.Body)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"golang-nuts" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit
20 matches
Mail list logo
