[go-nuts] [Code Review] Web App Boilerplate using the stdlib.

2018-08-08 Thread John Unland
Howdy folks, made this project to see if you can really use the stdlib to write a web app server without using a framework and also give me a base for future web apps that I feel like building with a set of generic docs. It almost to the state where I can take it and actually start using it

[go-nuts] Future of Frozen Packages

2018-05-25 Thread John Unland
So I'm going thru some of the Github issues, I'm wondering what will become of these packages that are frozen in the stdlib: - log/syslog (Implements logging facilities for *nix operating systems) - net/smtp (Implements RFC 5321) - net/rpc (Implements remote procedure calls for Go-Only

Re: [go-nuts] proposal: embed static assets

2018-05-03 Thread John Unland
On Wednesday, May 2, 2018 at 3:12:58 PM UTC-5, Manlio Perillo wrote: > Yes, but many developers may need a "debug" mode or more options available > to where to store the assets. > Why should a "standard" tool or API be restricted to where to store assets? > I can kinda see where your going

Re: [go-nuts] proposal: embed static assets

2018-05-01 Thread John Unland
thing like... *go build -ldflags="-X main.Asset1=./SomeFileA main.Asset2=./SomeFileB"*Think this would take a little more effort to integrate in but it's a interesting concept thou. On Monday, April 30, 2018 at 2:57:12 PM UTC-5, Ian Lance Taylor wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 30, 201

Re: [go-nuts] proposal: embed static assets

2018-04-30 Thread John Unland
UTC-5, Ian Lance Taylor wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 30, 2018 at 7:03 AM, John Unland <unlan...@gmail.com > > wrote: > > > > Hey everyone I've been mulling over this for a couple of days, thought I > > would get some feed back on the possibility of shooting a proposal

[go-nuts] proposal: embed static assets

2018-04-30 Thread John Unland
Hey everyone I've been mulling over this for a couple of days, thought I would get some feed back on the possibility of shooting a proposal to have embedding static assets into the stdlib. From the looks of it this wouldn't break Go 1 compatibility thou I'm wondering if it would be better to