I've created https://github.com/golang/go/issues/53210 and the answer is
already in! The initial thread m0 is actually handled differently in that
it doesn't get terminated but, to use the runtime terminology, "wedged".
Now this explains what I'm seeing in production, because by some chance m0
On Thu, Jun 2, 2022 at 9:21 AM TheDiveO wrote:
>
> On Thursday, June 2, 2022 at 5:48:18 PM UTC+2 Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
>>
>> Can you point to any documentation about the problem. Earlier you
>> mentioned that there was something in the procfs man page. I didn't
>> see it, but as the procfs man p
Hi Ian,
On Thursday, June 2, 2022 at 5:48:18 PM UTC+2 Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
> Can you point to any documentation about the problem. Earlier you
> mentioned that there was something in the procfs man page. I didn't
> see it, but as the procfs man page is very large I'm sure I just
> missed i
On Thu, Jun 2, 2022 at 6:20 AM TheDiveO wrote:
>
> On Thursday, June 2, 2022 at 3:03:17 AM UTC+2 Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Jun 1, 2022 at 10:45 AM TheDiveO wrote:
>> > What now? Terminating T0 doesn't look like a great idea at second look:
>> > for instance, as I mentioned above, this
Hi Ian,
On Thursday, June 2, 2022 at 3:03:17 AM UTC+2 Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 1, 2022 at 10:45 AM TheDiveO wrote:
> > What now? Terminating T0 doesn't look like a great idea at second look:
> for instance, as I mentioned above, this causes some problems further down
> the road, s
On Wed, Jun 1, 2022 at 10:45 AM TheDiveO wrote:
>
> While exploring more of the proc.go code I noticed that my original question
> somehow didn't fully reflect what I'm wondering about: what happens in the
> following situation...? Are all tasks/threads really equal?
>
> a non-main G42 goroutine
While exploring more of the proc.go code I noticed that my original
question somehow didn't fully reflect what I'm wondering about: what
happens in the following situation...? Are all tasks/threads really equal?
- a non-main G42 goroutine gets scheduled onto the main thread/leader
task, w
Ian, thank you very much! Found it and am now trying to somehow get my head
around it!
On Thursday, May 26, 2022 at 9:46:26 PM UTC+2 Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
> On Thu, May 26, 2022 at 12:08 PM TheDiveO wrote:
>
> >
> > On Thursday, May 26, 2022 at 8:51:49 PM UTC+2 Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
> >>
>
On Thu, May 26, 2022 at 12:08 PM TheDiveO wrote:
>
> On Thursday, May 26, 2022 at 8:51:49 PM UTC+2 Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
>>
>> If the scheduler is running on a goroutine locked using
>> runtime.LockOSThread and needs to start a new thread, it does so by
>> asking a template thread to create it.
On Thursday, May 26, 2022 at 8:51:49 PM UTC+2 Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
> If the scheduler is running on a goroutine locked using
> runtime.LockOSThread and needs to start a new thread, it does so by
> asking a template thread to create it. The template thread doesn't do
> anything other than cr
On Thu, May 26, 2022 at 11:17 AM TheDiveO wrote:
>
> On Thursday, May 26, 2022 at 7:39:10 PM UTC+2 Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
>>
>> > But what about T0? Wouldn't throwing away T0 terminate the whole program
>> > ... which doesn't seem to be the case? Or am I mistaken here?
>>
>> Once you've created
On Thursday, May 26, 2022 at 7:39:10 PM UTC+2 Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
> > But what about T0? Wouldn't throwing away T0 terminate the whole program
> ... which doesn't seem to be the case? Or am I mistaken here?
>
> Once you've created multiple threads in a process, the original thread
> (what y
On Thu, May 26, 2022 at 10:34 AM TheDiveO wrote:
>
> Even after some research I couldn't find -- or stupidly missed -- what
> happens in this case; I suspect this to "somehow" be the underlaying cause of
> some of my applications ending up with their main OS-level thread sitting in
> the wrong
Even after some research I couldn't find -- or stupidly missed -- what
happens in this case; I suspect this to "somehow" be the underlaying cause
of some of my applications ending up with their main OS-level thread
sitting in the wrong network namespace albeit I made sure to ditch all
OS-level
14 matches
Mail list logo