On Mon, 20 Feb 2017 12:50:32 -0800 (PST)
Kevin Powick wrote:
[...]
> I'm not really up on Activestate's involvement with Go, but have they
> contributed to the development or promotion of Go in any significant
> way?
I'm not up with their involvement in Go as well, but I know about their
involv
On Wednesday, 2 November 2016 12:53:23 UTC-4, je...@activestate.com wrote:
> respond to this thread, email me, or you can sign up to our mail list (
> http://www.activestate.com/go)
>
My favourite lines from that website.
_COMING SOON: ACTIVEGO - THE WORLD'S BEST GO DISTRIBUTION_
Maybe
On Friday, 4 November 2016 06:02:50 UTC+2, Nate Finch wrote:
>
> I'm curious to know what Activestate plans to bring to the table that
> isn't already a part of the go distributions people can download off of
> golang.org. I see it mentions the distribution including "popular
> modules" (I pres
Thanks for the replies Nate and Tong.
We've helped out on packaging for all of our languages in the past, so that
might be a place where we can help. We bring a number of strengths to the
table that will feature in our distros. We build for all manner of
platforms and we will provide the most p
If you are talking about packaging, there is a newly established
go packaging committee, or something alike, discussed here just a while
ago.
On Wednesday, November 2, 2016 at 12:53:23 PM UTC-4, je...@activestate.com
wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> At ActiveState we see Go as one of the languages of th
I'm curious to know what Activestate plans to bring to the table that isn't
already a part of the go distributions people can download off of
golang.org. I see it mentions the distribution including "popular modules"
(I presume it means packages)... but given how easy it is to just go-get
pack
