Absolutely what I was going to say.
On Tue, Nov 27, 2018 at 6:32 AM Robert Engels wrote:
> Breaks backwards compatibility as the switch may already be in a for loop
> and using continue...
>
> On Nov 26, 2018, at 11:50 PM, Göcs Jëss wrote:
>
> We might as well reduce a one rarely used keyword
Breaks backwards compatibility as the switch may already be in a for loop and
using continue...
> On Nov 26, 2018, at 11:50 PM, Göcs Jëss wrote:
>
> We might as well reduce a one rarely used keyword
>
> continue means recommence or resume after interruption by google
>
> if a continue
We might as well reduce a one rarely used keyword
continue means recommence or resume after interruption *by google*
if a continue triggers, the switch, select, or for loop statement *resumes*
another
case or condition
we could do continues inside switch statements
switch 1 {case 1:
