Hi,
I followed all instructions for the GuestBook application (no GWT) and
deployed it onto the AppEngine. I am using Ubuntu 9.04 + Eclipse 3.5 +
Google AppEngine 1.2.2.
The application is running perfectly on my local machine. However I
have no output at http://anudemoapp.appspot.com/.
When I
I have the exact same problem right now ... is the appengine down?
note that I see the 404 errors in the app engine Logs (Main - Logs),
so it looks that the HTTP request reaches something in the app
engine infrastructure
On Aug 22, 11:11 pm, Shack shack1...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I followed
It looks like deploying the default app created by the google toolbar
(before cutting and pasting anything into it) does deploy and runs
correctly, so I guess now it is a matter of debugging and trying to
find what part of the Guestbook example does not agree with the App
Engine.
On Aug 22,
On Aug 23, 2:46 am, Marcel Overdijk marceloverd...@gmail.com wrote:
Has anyone had a better luck with this?
I gave up on the mvn-appengine-plugin as the dependancies were broken
and no one seems to maintain it. I also had a crack at using the
datanucleus plugin but gave up after running
Hi,
I have a structure similar to this this:
class Zoo
{
Animal animal;
}
class Zebra implements Animal
{
}
class Donkey implements Animal
{
}
All classes are annotated as PersistenceCapable etc and enhanced. I
get this error:
javax.jdo.JDOUserException: Field animal is declared as a
Just to clarify, index.html is the default file that will be returned
if you do not specify the .jsp extension. Static files take priority
when there is ambiguity. If you do not specify any file (as you did,)
then you should receive a page with links to each application you have
available. In
Try using the full url path to the application:
http://anudemoapp.appspot.com/guestbook.jsp
If you use http://anudemoapp.appspot.com/guestbook
You get your index.html file.
I'm not sure why this happens. It may be a serve-side bug?
On Aug 23, 2:11 am, Shack shack1...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I
I think there is an inconsistency in the way jetty and the app engine
handle welcome files configuration, I fixed my problem by removing the
front slash in the web.xml file i.e. I used
welcome-file-list
welcome-fileguestbook.jsp/welcome-file
/welcome-file-list
Did you try changing level to FINEST in your logging.properties
file ?
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google App Engine for Java group.
To post to this group, send email to
As I have the same problem, I take the freedon to respond wiht my
details. I tred with both Eclipse and Ant. When I enter a wrong
password, I get the error email and password do not match. If I
enter them correctly, I get the 401 Must authenticate first error.
I am definetely not behind a proxy
On Aug 22, 8:25 pm, drone andr...@gmail.com wrote:
So, has anyone actually got Maven up and running with a GAE project?
(and I mean really Maven, not Maven for this and Ant for that)
Yeah, but I don't use JDO or GWT. I just build with Maven and upload
with the shell script. I didn't get
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
rick wrote:
Did you try changing level to FINEST in your logging.properties
file ?
Yes, that did it. Thanks very much!
(And it would be dead handy if the App Engine documentation could
mention this --- it is the only form of debugging
K
Sent from my iPhone
On Aug 23, 2009, at 9:39 AM, Philippe Marschall philippe.marsch...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Aug 22, 8:25 pm, drone andr...@gmail.com wrote:
So, has anyone actually got Maven up and running with a GAE project?
(and I mean really Maven, not Maven for this and Ant for
Thank you. It works by using the guestbook.jsp as you have said.
Cheers.
--Shack
On Aug 23, 11:39 pm, eshriek eshr...@gmail.com wrote:
Just to clarify, index.html is the default file that will be returned
if you do not specify the .jsp extension. Static files take priority
when there is
Dumb question, but just want to make sure that I'm getting this right.
In my dashboard I see:
Stored Data, $0.005/GByte-day, 0%, 0.07 of 201.00 GBytes, $0.00 /
$1.00
Am I correct in interpurting this to say that I've used 0.07 GBytes
(~72 MBytes) of storage so far?
Thanks,
Jesse
No this is not possible, for many reasons.
A static IP would lose much of the advantage of AppEngine.
You could if you want proxy the site though the server with the static
IP, but seems kinda silly.
On 23/08/2009, yaoye yaoye...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi, guys,
Would it be possible to bind a
Is there a limit to the number of entities that can reference a given
entity?
For example,
class Class1(db.Model):
prop1 : db.IntegerProperty()
class Class2(db.Model):
ref_prop: db.ReferenceProperty(Class1, collection=my_references)
Is there a limit to the number of class2
Is there a limit to the number of entities that can reference a given
entity?
For example,
class Class1(db.Model):
prop1 : db.IntegerProperty()
class Class2(db.Model):
ref_prop: db.ReferenceProperty(Class1, collection=my_references)
Is there a limit to the number of class2
I'd like to be able to find all Articles that contain certain words
and have been tagged by a given user.
Is there a good App Engine way to do this?
I started down this path:
- Articles are db.Searchable entities
- Each user tag creates a new UserTag entity
userID : db.UserProperty
It seems that the keys_only flag in the Kind.all(keys_only=True) does
not work/compile for the search.Searchable model.
I get an 'unexpected keyword' error msg.
[Tried to post this a few days ago, but it's not findable]
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this
On Aug 23, 6:05 am, Thomas Wiradikusuma wiradikus...@gmail.com
wrote:
E.g. Python in the backend and GWT in the frontend.
It is possible but I didn't investigate thoroughly the support you get
for RPC. In my case I have very few types of calls that are
performance sensitive so I don't mind
hi, this is unrelated to getting around the 1000 query results limit -
this is to get around the composite indexes limit.
re 4 filters: I would say you need to store permutations, so that you
don't have to do the post processing steps you mentioned, ie. if there
is filterA and filterB, let's say
http://pastie.org/592489
If you can help me answer this question, I would appreciate it.
The above code takes the following ~ time: 1370ms 1725cpu_ms
670api_cpu_ms.
Changing the query to return the Actions bumps it up to : 2311ms
3050cpu_ms 1018api_cpu_ms
Changing the Action.get() to use the
Your query will probably fetch more then 25 Action objects. Fetching
all those Keys is fast. Fetching all the complete objects is slow, you
fetch a lot more then you need.
If you iterate over the GQL query, no fetch, that requests full Action
objects (SELECT * FROM ACTION...), the objects
Every a.project statement results in a db.get() operation.
Try to batch get() the project_key cache misses, and then set_multi()
these in memcache.
Put/Copy the project.active and project.deleted booleans in the Action object.
Then you can use them in the query and just fetch 25 Action objects
As we know we can use http://localhost/_ah/admin; to go through the
local database before upload to GAE. And we can not directly use
http://www.mydomain.com/_ah/admin; to visit the online database after
appcfg.py to GAE.
My question is:
how can I achieve the same as online database? How to
26 matches
Mail list logo
