Why don't you use oauth? If I understand what you're wanting to do, it
solves exactly this type of problem.
Google: data oauth
Robert
On Jun 30, 2011 11:49 AM, "Nikolay Sohryakov"
wrote:
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google App Engine" group.
To
Why not directly use tropo's API from the GAE app? I've had good luck with
their APIs + GAE apps in my testing.
On Jul 2, 2011 10:45 PM, "egilchri" wrote:
> Is it feasible to have the Channel API work with node.js? I would like
> to send Channel API messages, from App Engine, and have them picke
Not sure, but you might file a billing issue if you haven't already got some
help with this.
On Jun 28, 2011 3:25 PM, "NealWalters" wrote:
> My bright co-worker apparently deleted our admin account
> zu...@olexe.com. We had two other accounts in the domain, but as far
> as I know, they were never
Hi,
If you search these groups you'll find several questions about this. I
don't recall the specifics, but I think one solution involved adding an
"empty" django app in your project's root directory.
Robert
On Jun 23, 2011 9:50 PM, "carlitux" wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am trying to use django1.2 use_
Yes, trying to guess about these things is quite unpleasant. Things like
pending ms and throttle codes should be clearly documented, especially in
light of the upcoming pricing changes.
As I recall, you might see throttle codes + pending ms if your requests need
over 1000ms to run or if your requ
One channel gives one connection between one browser and app engine,
so for a 1 on 1 game you would need 2.
But, the current channels are valid for 2 hours and can be reused
after the one browsers stops needing it in another browser (you need
to do that reuse yourself). I don't know if this will be
Is it feasible to have the Channel API work with node.js? I would like
to send Channel API messages, from App Engine, and have them picked up
by a server running node.js. I'm interested, because I would like to
have a "speech server" sitting on a host running node.js that would
take incoming Channe
We resell service, so our pricing is a function of the code efficiency. I
may just be a better Python programmer, and that is why it is
faster/cheaper.
-Brandon
From: google-appengine@googlegroups.com
[mailto:google-appengine@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Waleed Abdulla
Sent: Saturday, Ju
I'm curious why your Java version costs more currently! Can you share more
details? I would've expected the Java version to cost less since Java has
JIT compilation so the code should run faster.
As for your questions, I'd say that the price difference will likely be
small compared to the cost of
So, for a 1 vs 1 game, can one pool the channels? opening a new channel for
each game session would be very expensive.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google App Engine" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/ms
I have kind of asked this before.
I am trying to decide if I take the python of my app and expand it, or the
version I ported to Java. The Java version currently costs more to run,
than the python version, but the new pricing would put the Java version as
cheaper, at least until instances sup
BTW I think it is the number of channels opened, not concurrently
open.
I've never seen a mention of a limit on number of concurrent channels.
On Jul 2, 11:45 am, Chiguireitor wrote:
> Hi all, i was just reading the new pricing scheme and came along a little
> tidbit that made me feel a little un
Hello,
My free quota of 1 GB of datastore usage is being consumed by
"_DeferredTaskEntity" entities. Are these being generated as a result
of using a frequently occuring cron job? Are they safe to cleanup? I
don't have any deferred or other task queue usage in my application.
thanks,
Brian
--
That price applies to either Paid or Premier, sorry for the poorly formatted
page, we'll be updating that page soon.
Greg
On Sat, Jul 2, 2011 at 11:30 AM, Chiguireitor
wrote:
> Fee... Not free, stupid swype keyboard
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Grou
Fee... Not free, stupid swype keyboard
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google App Engine" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-appengine/-/XAS6x5hrnxEJ.
To post to this group, send email to google-ap
That's only for the premium edition, the $500/account plan, the $9/mo/app
option doesn't specify the additional free for the concurrent channels
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google App Engine" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit
http
No http://www.google.com/enterprise/appengine/appengine_pricing.html
100 channel per day - free limit, you can pay for additional channels.
2011/7/2 Chiguireitor
> Hi all, i was just reading the new pricing scheme and came along a little
> tidbit that made me feel a little uncomfortable: The $9/
My indexés are always in errors, where is the support please?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google App Engine" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-appengine/-/Lxiho_khIS0J.
To post to this group,
Your google apps/sites dns is probably being served by another provider.
Check the documentation:
http://www.google.com/support/a/bin/answer.py?answer=48090
You have to ask your current DNS registar to modify your information. Do a
whois lookup of your domain so you get to know who's your regist
Hi all, i was just reading the new pricing scheme and came along a little
tidbit that made me feel a little uncomfortable: The $9/mo plan has a limit
of 100 channels opened simultaneosly and doesn't have a way to pay for more
channels simultaneosly opened!!! Is this true? are we going to be limi
I do all this with SES on a domain with google apps. Google apps only
hosts the mail, I am not aware of a dns solution by google apps. I
host my dns elsewhere.
On Jul 2, 12:23 am, pdknsk wrote:
> I'd like to switch mails to Amazon SES and register a domain with
> Google Apps, to enable SPF and
ok my bad I've been using google apps so long I forgot all about that
ability
On Jul 2, 12:44 am, "Brandon Wirtz" wrote:
> Yeah, I'm anti-gmail. Google knows enough about me with out reading my
> mail.
>
> From: google-appengine@googlegroups.com
> [mailto:google-appengine@googlegroups.com] On B
one last idea.make your http paths with keys
instead of having
/root/p1/p2/p3
have something like this
/1000/1001/1002/1003 (assuming root's id is 1000 and so on)
Now you can query a folder using last node in this path 1003..forget about
who is his parent as 1003 can have only one parent, so
hi ravi,
i was not thinking to make the folder know about its children. files and
folders have a StringListProperty where i store all keys of the folders it
belongs to.
your approach is exactly what i wanted to avoid. i think its not the right way
to do this because the longer the path the lon
One Suggestion
Instead of making a folder know his all child folder and files..may be try
other way round by letting every folder/file know its parent... also save
depth of folder and files..
e.g.
Class File{
Key id,
String anme;
Key parentId,
int depth;
String type;//folder or file
}
and for
Thanks. I guess I'll try a different Account then. I got 2 Cells left for
the SMS verification. Maybe I'm lucky and another account works.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google App Engine" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://gr
Hi,
In my application, running on master/slave, I have model called Total
where key names that are set to a combination of a string encoded key
and a descriptor.
For example, a key name could be set to "UserClicks-%s"%user.key().
So to get the total user clicks for a user, I run
Total.get_by_key_
hi,
I'm trying to build a filesystem like folder tree on appengine python but I'm
not sure about the architecture of the app.
lets say i have folders and images. folders can contain other folders and
images. building the relationship is not the problem
because every entity will have a StringLis
I really like the cusors (we use them in Siena GAE abstraction layer).
Nevertheless, it just lacks a backward aspect to the cursors ;)
Pascal
On Sat, Jul 2, 2011 at 7:10 AM, Robert Kluin wrote:
> The cursor is just a 'bookmark' in the index. It simply tells the
> query where to resume returnin
Hello Robert,
The status stays only in Error,
I have try to vaccum indexes, but that doesn't work. and i have 1 index in
building and 10indexes in deleting since 1day now
Thanks about your response.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google App Engin
30 matches
Mail list logo
