[google-appengine] Re: Doom day

2011-12-03 Thread Alexis
You can look at this thread if you want more details about instances settings: http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine/browse_thread/thread/260e7cefc6e5d482/bf9b4a4a804a3091 On 2 déc, 18:04, Gerald Tan wrote: > If you set Max Idle Instance to automatic you will always pay for the total

[google-appengine] Re: Doom day

2011-12-03 Thread Alexis
We are still using Python25 too and don't feel confident moving our production apps to 2.7 when seeing issues like this: http://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/issues/detail?id=6401 or this: http://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/issues/detail?id=6323 or the one Kaan linked to... -- You r

RE: [google-appengine] Doom day

2011-12-03 Thread Brandon Wirtz
Or this. http://www.xyhd.tv/2011/11/industry-news/setting-google-appengine-gae-perfor mance-sliders-for-instance-and-latency/ From: google-appengine@googlegroups.com [mailto:google-appengine@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Kaan Soral Sent: Thursday, December 01, 2011 7:27 AM To: google-a

RE: [google-appengine] Re: Doom day

2011-12-03 Thread Brandon Wirtz
I run on 2.7. I have been rock solid and my costs are 1/10th what they are on 2.5 I had very few code changes other than removing CGI handlers. I would recommend 2.7 without hesitation. Pointing out 2 bugs that aren't well documented, and (one of which I can't Repo) Is more of a "I'm too lazy

[google-appengine] Status Update On "Sucking On"

2011-12-03 Thread Brandon Wirtz
Links in this Email are NSFW Since I only created http://Suckingon.Appspot.com To serve as a testing ground, I thought I would share some info about its status since going live. Yesterday it got its first traffic from search. Total of 7 visitors. Google Bot Googlebot activity Is the

Re: [google-appengine] Re: Doom day

2011-12-03 Thread Brian Quinlan
Hi Brandon, On Sat, Dec 3, 2011 at 8:11 PM, Brandon Wirtz wrote: > I run on 2.7. I have been rock solid and my costs are 1/10th what they are > on 2.5 Wow, that's awesome! > I had very few code changes other than removing CGI handlers. Also good news. > I would recommend 2.7 without hesitatio

Re: [google-appengine] Status Update On "Sucking On"

2011-12-03 Thread Leandro Rezende
i just did it now =) 2011/12/3 Brandon Wirtz > Links in this Email are NSFW > > ** ** > > Since I only created http://Suckingon.Appspot.com To serve as a testing > ground, I thought I would share some info about its status since going live. > > > ** ** > > Yesterday it got its first tr

Re: [google-appengine] Re: Please help me how to move my data to the cloud

2011-12-03 Thread Nandar Wai Yee
I saw the following errors in the Logs...:( 1. 2011-12-01 13:32:56.097 /bmiHistoryCalculate 500 180ms 0kb Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.0; WOW64) AppleWebKit/535.2 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/15.0.874.121 Safari/535.2 129.234.230.69 - - [01/Dec/2011:13:32:56 -0800] "POST /bmiHistoryCalcu

RE: [google-appengine] Re: Doom day

2011-12-03 Thread Brandon Wirtz
I didn't mean to say that Alexis's bugs aren't real, just that the presence of 2 bugs shouldn't prevent someone from starting the conversion to the new system. You can't make the move without testing. There are bugs in 2.5. Your odds of hitting a bug is higher on 2.7, but they are far from guaran

Re: [google-appengine] db.get() on a list of keys being split into multiple get_async() calls as opposed to a single get_async() call

2011-12-03 Thread Timofey Koolin
Production get every entity too. But do it in parallel mode - at the same time. 2011/12/3 Bryce Cutt : > Did the production server change the way it handles a db.get() on a > list of keys? I believe it used to do a single get_async on the list > of keys but now it appears that it is doing a get_as

Re: [google-appengine] Re: Doom day

2011-12-03 Thread Adrian Scott
We're simply not going to 2.7 until it's no longer experimental. It's that simple. We're doing enough other stuff that's experimental etc. It would have made sense for Google to extend the 50% discount til one month after 2.7 leaving experimental, imho, and that would have created a nice little inc

[google-appengine] List property indexing question

2011-12-03 Thread Mahron
Hi, if I have a list already stored and modify one of the items in that list, will it re-index all the list or just the what has been modified ? and does changing the order of the list have any effect on indexing ? >From what I understood every list item is considered as a property on its own so

[google-appengine] Everything within quota still need to pay weekly spend if using blobstore

2011-12-03 Thread Romesh Soni
Dear Java lovers, I have a small application which is within free quota (and will remain). I am using blobstore for some small work and even this usage is free quota. But to use blobstore, I had to turn on billing. Now since the billing is turned on Google sent me a weekly Minimum spend Invoice. A

Re: [google-appengine] Everything within quota still need to pay weekly spend if using blobstore

2011-12-03 Thread Timofey Koolin
$2.1/week - minimum payments for google. It spend always if you enable billing in application. You can turn off billing. After appengine out of preview - all applications can use blobstore. 2011/12/3 Romesh Soni : > Dear Java lovers, > > I have a small application which is within free quota (and w

Re: [google-appengine] Everything within quota still need to pay weekly spend if using blobstore

2011-12-03 Thread Romesh Soni
So does it mean: 1) I don't need to pay this $2.1 ? 2) If app engine goes out of preview. I can still use blobstore, but don't need to enable billing? 3) If I turn off billing now, the blobstore will get disabled? Please let me know if I can use appengine+blobstore (within limits) without paying

Re: [google-appengine] Everything within quota still need to pay weekly spend if using blobstore

2011-12-03 Thread Barry Hunter
Exactly, you get 5G blobstore storage for free http://www.google.com/enterprise/cloud/appengine/pricing.html http://code.google.com/appengine/docs/quotas.html#Blobstore Work on non billing enabled apps. On Sat, Dec 3, 2011 at 3:51 PM, Romesh Soni wrote: > So does it mean: > > 1) I don't need to

[google-appengine] Feature request for GoogleAppEngineLauncher (Mac)

2011-12-03 Thread GAEfan
Would be nice if GAELauncher remembered the window positions from last time it was opened. It's a bit of a pain to have to resize/reposition the app window and log window each time I quit and restart the app. Thanks. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups

[google-appengine] Re: Timeouts to Paypal

2011-12-03 Thread Vivek Puri
Ikai This is the production Paypal. Timeouts are happening in 1 out of 10 urlfetch calls. Thank you On Dec 2, 1:03 pm, "Ikai Lan (Google)" wrote: > Vivek, is this to the Paypal sandbox or the real Paypal API? > > The sandbox has been observed as being pretty slow, but the real API is > suppose

[google-appengine] Move data from one local app to another

2011-12-03 Thread Vivek Puri
I have moved my app from MS to HRD and as a result the app name has changed. As a result all the local data is associated with the old app name and i have to keep switching back and forth between app names while deploying and developing. Would anyone know how to migrate data from one local app to a

[google-appengine] Re: The Performance of the SDK development server has become unbearable

2011-12-03 Thread Vivek Puri
I got the proxy working on my end and it has definitely helped. Local pages are loading in around 20 seconds, which were earlier taking 60+ seconds. On Nov 30, 2:20 pm, "Ikai Lan (Google)" wrote: > Vivek, > > I get you. There are definitely parts of the SDK and dev appserver that we > can impro

[google-appengine] Re: Move data from one local app to another

2011-12-03 Thread James X Nelson
Have you tried copy-pasting the generated ds flat-file, /war/WEB-INF/appengine-generated/local_db.bin ? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine" group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe f

[google-appengine] Re: Move data from one local app to another

2011-12-03 Thread James X Nelson
Ok, so I hex dumped my local file, and it has the app id all over the place. You may be able to try out the remote api between local installations, or you're going to need to grep/cat find/replace the app ids in a copy of your local ds If you don't like either of these options, write a servle