The app I had trouble with is an HR app so I can confirm it is not only M/S
apps experiencing the problem.
My app is currently working great but I am watching it closely since others
have seen the problems recur.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Go
Hi guys, there were two questions arising while I was trying Django
Norel test app.
Firstly, the offical Django works amazingly, as I put it into the
project folder instead of Django Norel version.
Thus the question 1 is: how many changes in Django-Norel/
Django matter compared with the
Are there any plans to provide First and Last name attributes (any time
soon)?
Thanks!
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google App Engine" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-appengine/-/VsJVoTB1TH
Time outs would cost more than serving the content.
-Original Message-
From: google-appengine@googlegroups.com
[mailto:google-appengine@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of sb
Sent: Monday, January 09, 2012 6:45 PM
To: Google App Engine
Subject: [google-appengine] Re: Google Bot Is Still the ene
Google should realize that if a page hasn't changed in a year then
there is no need to index the thing more than once a month.
>We have tried to put code to slow down how fast we serve pages to google bot,
>but that is almost as expensive as serving the page...
What happens if you only serve the
Are you all on the 1.6.1 SDK? Is someone experiencing this deploying with
an older SDK?
If someone has a deterministically reproducible case that you can share
with us (project files and everything), it'd be very helpful for us to nail
this bug. We aren't able to do this with our test apps (big ap
Just did that, redeployed and it didn't fix anything.
Edited the part below to have .css (adding a
period) and now the workaround to the workaround works.
jon
On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 3:16 PM, Amy Unruh wrote:
> For those affected, it looks like a workaround is to add the following to
> your w
Stephen thanks for the correction. Obviously I didn't try hard enough
to paint a bleak picture :)
Richard I highly doubt that Twitter would be able to turn a tweet into
something worth, say, $5. Remember that most tweets are rather
mindless and of low quality.
On Jan 10, 5:33 am, Stephen wrote:
To Ikai's question about if this is happening in Python. I thought I had
seen it in Python, but upon inspection that was a Java Version of our app
that we hadn't migrated to Python. So disregard my earlier mention that it
happens on Python as well.
From: google-appengine@googlegroups.com
[mailto
For those affected, it looks like a workaround is to add the following to
your web.xml:
css
text/css
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 6:27 AM, Ikai Lan (Google) wrote:
> Can anyone confirm if they are seeing this for Python? We suspect this is
> Java only and that this is happening during application
For those affected, it looks like a workaround is to add the following to
your web.xml:
css
text/css
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 4:44 AM, Mos wrote:
> Hello GAE-Team,
>
> no news in 24h on this critical issue?
>
> I'm new to GAE and we will release our first application the next days.
> But t
Please star the feature request:
http://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/issues/detail?id=6703&thanks=6703&ts=1326143823
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google App Engine" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d
Brandon +1
On Jan 9, 2012 8:56 PM, "Brandon Wirtz" wrote:
> You are kind of trolling.
>
> ** **
>
> You aren’t as yet effected by the bug, but are complaining about the
> response to the issue.
>
> ** **
>
> “Simple issue” I kind of baited Brian the other day to ask why Numpy
> Save
Hi,
We have the same needs too, a single user controlling the list of downloads
and receiving the essays. I'll send you the code offline.
Ernesto
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google App Engine" group.
To post to this group, send email to google-
I was mistaken. This app is M/S (we have another app which is HR).
So I guess the fix is to migrate it over to HR.
--Chip
On Jan 9, 12:58 pm, Chip wrote:
> The application is now unusable. More than 50% of the requests fail
> with the DeadlineExceededError.
>
> Other requests (with the same U
Thanks for the answer!
redjava
On Jan 8, 7:11 pm, Brian Quinlan wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 2:04 PM, Brandon Wirtz wrote:
> > I don’t use numpy, so I have no clue, but doesn’t Savez just compress save?
>
> No, it uses a fairly different code path.
>
> > Can the same thing be achieved using
very large
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google App Engine" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-appengine/-/BamZLYhgWm4J.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com.
To
Try using TaskOptions.payload(byte[] payload, java.Lang.String contentType)
TaskOptions task = TaskOptions.Builder
.withUrl("/mytaskhandler")
.payload(jsonBody.getBytes(), "application/json");
QueueFactory.getDefaultQueue().add(task);
Nick Verne
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 3:29 AM, A
You are kind of trolling.
You aren't as yet effected by the bug, but are complaining about the
response to the issue.
"Simple issue" I kind of baited Brian the other day to ask why Numpy Savez
couldn't get a "simple" fix and he gave a pretty good explanation of the
complexities of a maint
Seems like we keep seeing this. I think this may be due to a variety or
reasons that are either application or developer specific, but I also think
that developers are slowly learning what apps work best on a particular
platform, and part of that is realizing that GAE is not really a good fit
Thanks. It was late, I was tired. =)
jon
On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 9:28 AM, Joshua Smith wrote:
>
> On Jan 9, 2012, at 2:39 AM, Jon Stevens wrote:
>
> all intensive purposes
>
>
> FYI: The expression is "all intents and purposes." It comes from English
> common law.
>
> :)
>
> --
> You received t
OK, and you're saying this can be done automatically after the first
manual authorization?
I just want to make sure so that I won't have to do manual
authorization every now and then for the app to be able look in the
calendar.
Just so we're clear: The GAE-app will NOT need access to the calendar
Can anyone confirm if they are seeing this for Python? We suspect this is
Java only and that this is happening during application upload.
--
Ikai Lan
Developer Programs Engineer, Google App Engine
plus.ikailan.com | twitter.com/ikai
On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 8:10 PM, Brandon Wirtz wrote:
> It ef
This is part of a code wich is placed in a on a webpage in my
appengine domein. I mean on this webpage I show a code example, this part of
the code give a error from the Django template.
This is a part of the code wich gives the error
error
-- Play the selected radio station
de
1. When DART is ready for deployment, will the GAE have App Engine
DART?
Thanks
Sasi.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google App Engine" group.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, s
I'm having the exact same problem. It seems that it has been
intermittent for about 1-2 weeks, and judging from another thread on
here (http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine/browse_thread/
thread/47a765bf9740c951/d0b91e8977e36c77?
hl=en&lnk=gst&q=DeadlineExceededError#d0b91e8977e36c77) t
First off, I'm new to App Engine task queues, and so I may just be going
against the grain here. Feel free to redirect me if that's the case.
What I'd like to do is queue a task and supply a JSON payload in the HTTP
request to the handler
Here's what I'm trying...
TaskOptions task = TaskO
Hi All,
From the very beginning of google app engine I am trying to create
an app. Now to do that I am suppose to verify my account by doing something
with the sms i am suppose to receive from google. Now here comes the story.
I have tried sending sms to my account. And it never really
On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 8:12 AM, jon wrote:
>
> It's so expensive that the Relation Index Entity technique
> proposed by your own Brett Slatkin has become cost prohibitive.
>
> If Twitter was built on GAE using Relation Index Entity, each tweet made
> by a popular user with 1 million followers woul
When achieving competitive pricing demands customers can understand
and apply a secret sauce, something is seriously lacking. Although I
like GAE, it needs a lot of work on non-technical, whole-product
solution elements. stevep
On Jan 8, 12:30 am, "Brandon Wirtz" wrote:
> I can name that tune in
The application is now unusable. More than 50% of the requests fail
with the DeadlineExceededError.
Other requests (with the same URL's) return very quickly. Again, the
only explanation I can think of for this is a problematic Instance (or
other shared resource). If the request goes the broken
Thanks for the info, Joshua. I was almost convinced that moving to HR would
solve the issues, until I see this mail making me wonder if this is not
just about MS/HR..
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine/browse_thread/thread/89058dc033bc8d83?pli=1
Regards,
Raj
On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 1
Hello GAE-Team,
no news in 24h on this critical issue?
I'm new to GAE and we will release our first application the next days.
But this issue make me loose my confidence in GAE's reliability. I get
doubt if Google App Engine was the right choice?
As Jon mentioned: The issue is around on this lis
Hi Chip,
Sorry to hear that you are facing errors for your app too.
This has been a recurring issue for my app recently..
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine/browse_thread/thread/47a765bf9740c951/6f766324e3a0d4d2
Even though my app is on MS, the actual datastore queries are pretty fa
I'm wondering if one or more instances could be corrupt? When an end
user encounters a page with the DeadlineExceededError, they get a
server error:
"Error: Server Error
The server encountered an error and could not complete your request.
If the problem persists, please report your problem and m
ids do not change when you migrate. The full key changes, because it includes
the app name. But the id() part is preserved. You should be fine.
On Jan 9, 2012, at 6:18 AM, Rajkumar Radhakrishnan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> One of my app is a multi-tenant, metadata-driven online database app. I have
> use
On Jan 9, 2012, at 2:39 AM, Jon Stevens wrote:
> all intensive purposes
FYI: The expression is "all intents and purposes." It comes from English common
law.
:)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google App Engine" group.
To post to this group, send
ok i just tested the 2 operations with appstats and there is the same amount of
rpcs for both.
and i dont see any significant speed difference too.
so the conclusion is that if you want to fetch the latest 100 entities you use
fetch(100),
if you want to filter in memory and do checks on all ent
Yes, I am on MS and am considering to move over to HR. But now, it seems
the DeadlineExceededError (during instance loading.. which is what my app
faces) happens even for HR apps too..
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine/browse_thread/thread/89058dc033bc8d83?pli=1
On Mon, Jan 9, 2012
Hi, I use this code for upload a csv file and convert it.
//1) Get input stream from a blobstore file and the blobinfo metas
final BlobInfo blobInfo = new BlobInfoFactory().loadBlobInfo(blobKey);
BlobstoreInputStream blobStoreReader = null;
try {
blobStoreReader = new BlobstoreInputStream(bl
We're suddenly seeing a spike of DeadlineExceededError errors that
look like the GAE is having trouble importing its built-in modules.
Its an HR application in Python. This application is pre-release and
getting very little traffic.
Here's a sample error, but it seems to happen with many diffe
I'm very new to GAE. Could you anyone kindly show me how to upload a
PDF file from blobstore to google docs in Java? Thanks.
On Jan 7, 6:00 am, Ernesto Oltra wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've just finished today implementing a resumable uploader in my app, from
> blobstore to google docs. It's possible, it w
unfortunately what you're saying is not correct.
I can not send messages using the channel API
from one user on app version A to another user
on app version B. I tried many different ways,
but it didnt work. (Have you successfully send
a message?)
The channel API is "broken" between to different
v
We have a couple of servers that we use for sending emails out
(because we need better deliverability than appengine can offer).
Pull queues is what you want if your system doesnt scale
(like the 2 mailservers that we run...)
Cheers,
-Andrin
On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 3:30 PM, Efi Merdler-Kravitz
wro
Thank you for the responses. That's the way we were thinking doing it,
however we prefer to use pull queues and separate the two services
completely.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google App Engine" group.
To post to this group, send email to googl
I try convert API for convert incoming email from HTML to Text - it is
perfectly, but I have about 1-2 thousand email per day. Is any way to
increase quota for it?
--
Blog: www.rekby.ru
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google App Engine" group.
To p
We set expiration very long in both the headers and in the sitemap. We
tried killing the sitemap (since we were getting crawled and could see the
crawler winding through links). When you are assigned "special crawl rate"
because you are on Google infrastructure, you don't get any control. We
have
Or use this:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robots_exclusion_standard#Crawl-delay_directive
On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 12:58 PM, Anand Mistry wrote:
> Have you looked into using Sitemaps (
> http://www.sitemaps.org/protocol.html#changefreqdef) to hint at how often
> to crawl your site? Google, Bing
Have you looked into using Sitemaps
(http://www.sitemaps.org/protocol.html#changefreqdef) to hint at how often
to crawl your site? Google, Bing, and Yahoo all recognise the sitemaps
protocol, even though they may act on it differently.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to
Hi,
One of my app is a multi-tenant, metadata-driven online database app. I
have used the key().id() values extensively within my app for entity-names,
attribute-names and as values (including for custom namespace-id fields).
This app instance has been facing recurring
DeadlineExceededErrors
The biggest conclusion I drew was that mapreduce was the main
cost in datastore reads. I have several different mapreduces
running over the same entities. I now combined all mapreduces
into one combined mapreduce which reduced cost quite a bit.
Additionally I created an Environment class that acts
Hi Jon,
While I think there are some cases that need to be tweaked, the example you
provided doesn't seem too insane to me. If I had a service with 1000
1-million-follower users and I couldn't make a buck each time they tweeted,
I wouldn't think it's Google's fault. Saving, storing and sendin
I re-post this thread because I'm getting aalmost the same issue.
I'm not able to re-enable my application. It says "You cannot currently
re-enable this application because some owners already have too many
enabled free apps".
My account has 5 free app engine. The limit was 10, right?
Please h
I would really love to hear an opinion of one of the googlers on jon's post.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google App Engine" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-appengine/-/q5Ab5L1KYJAJ.
To post
54 matches
Mail list logo