Google is definitely not known for having good support. However, I
think they are obviously trying to improve on this front. I see new
Googler's names propping up answering questions all the time, so the
team is clearly growing. Voicing your concerns is probably good
feedback for them.
O
Hi Andrei,
I just wanted to comment on one little thing in addition to all the
stuff Jeff said. I'd not suggest using the task-queue to do all
writes by default, but it is a good idea. I would suggest that you
try the write, then if you hit an exception (over quota, timeout,
deadline, internal
Are you using sessions?
On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 05:37, Andrew Osipenko wrote:
> Hi Frank,
>
> Have you solved it?
>
> I have nearly the same problem.
>
> I think that appstats do not count some datastore read operations. I thought
> my application accessed datastore during intialization befor
Hey Vijay,
You should post the full error, including the exception info and
stack trace. It is very hard to debug issues without full and
accurate information.
Robert
On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 01:04, Vijay wrote:
> - With Python 2.7, I was able to start ./GoogleAppEngineLauncher.py
> but c
I've received a number of the "admin" versions (like what you've
posted), but I have yet to see a user version (though I am only a user
on several apps domains as well).
You'd think people working at a company like Google would be nerdy
enough to know that one-ring-to-rule-them-all never works out
Hey Steve,
The DEFAULT_APP_VERSION var was added so that you could send a task
to whatever version is currently marked as default. Without it there
was no way to target a task at the current default version of your
app. You'd want to use it if you have, for example, a backend that
inserts tasks
On Jan 29, 6:04 pm, "Brandon Wirtz" wrote:
> While I have made fun of the support plan, don't think that it is because it
> "is not much better" it just isn't what most people think. They aren't going
> to reach in and re-write your code, and if you are on MS it doesn't
> magically fix those lim
There are really only two hard issues that will limit your write rate,
assuming adequate budget:
1) Limit of one write per second per entity group.
This one is usually really easy to work around; just break your app up
into many entity groups. Most apps tend to naturally break down by
user or by
While I have made fun of the support plan, don't think that it is because it
"is not much better" it just isn't what most people think. They aren't going
to reach in and re-write your code, and if you are on MS it doesn't
magically fix those limitations. If you have down time, likely there is an
ou
I think my initial message was a bit unclear. I meant that each client
sends on average 1 post/minute and the system has to support several
thousand clients. Hundreds of writes per second may not be that far
away in the future.
Do you know some best practices in order to sustain the rates you
ment
On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 3:37 AM, pete7373 wrote:
> Also, if all businesses share
> same datastore, the tables will get very big which may slow things down.
FYI, this is not an issue with the GAE datastore. Your data already
lives in a very, very large table along with terabytes (petabytes?) of
o
hi,
I can't read the first part of your message :), but fill out this form if
you are having sms verification issues:
https://appengine.google.com/waitlist/sms_issues
2012/1/29 彼岸之美，在于彼岸之无渡。
> 我很早以前就已经注册并创建了goagent程序了 现在我想多创建几个出来 。但怎么提示我还要输入手机号码验证呢？我的号码已经验证过了 不能在次
> 验证了呀。 不是说只是首次需要手机短信验证吗？
> T
我很早以前就已经注册并创建了goagent程序了 现在我想多创建几个出来 。但怎么提示我还要输入手机号码验证呢？我的号码已经验证过了 不能在次
验证了呀。 不是说只是首次需要手机短信验证吗？
The phone number has been sent too many messages or has already been
used to confirm an
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google App Engine" group.
To post
hi,
You can use namespaces to support multitenancy -- see this page for more
information:
http://code.google.com/appengine/docs/python/multitenancy/overview.html
On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 7:37 PM, pete7373 wrote:
> I would like each user of my application to have their own separate DB
> instance.
I would like each user of my application to have their own separate DB
instance. This is because each user comes from different business and so I
don't want any risk of user A seeing data from user B (which could happen
if query forgot to say where owningUser = 'xyz'. Also, if all businesses
I haven't tried setting countdown. It's too slow for the mail queue
anyway. It might work on the other backend (mentioned in the bug).
I've moved most code away from backends though.
> *- After first minute of the batch run, Task Queue Details page
> consistently shows 6-8 tasks run in last minute
Interesting. I saw your thread but wasn't entirely sure if it was the
issue. I think the thing that threw me off was that your delays were
being reflected in the request ms in the logs, while in my case they
mostly aren't.
Does setting the task countdown work for you? Or is ~1 second delay
still t
I had the same problem, with often quite exact 20 seconds delays. More
details in this thread.
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine/browse_thread/thread/e5588268dff9b97a
In another configuration, the delay increased to several minutes.
Please star this bug.
http://code.google.com/p/go
If you have read what people say about the "Premium" support service, you
should know that its not much better neither. It could still take days to
just get a reply.
If you want a service with official support, AppEngine is not where you
should go.
--
You received this message because you a
Hello!
It appears that to get any support from Google a company has to
purchase a very expensive support plan. Regularly billed apps get
nothing - real production issues (e.g. indexes stuck in "error", even
with vacuum attempts) that affect app behavior don't get any attention
for hours or even da
Hi Frank,
Have you solved it?
I have nearly the same problem.
I think that appstats do not count some datastore read operations. I
thought my application accessed datastore during intialization before
appstat filter is being invoked. But I can't find anything bad during my
app initialization.
Thanks to you all for the input. However, I'm quite surprised :
- I disabled "Local HRD support" in "Appengine properties" (I'm using
Eclipse plugin)
- The app now appears to work normally (i.e showing no stale data) when
run locally
- My appengine app bastide07 indicates " Ma
Gets by key always return consistent data, unless you specifically force it
to be eventually consistent. Similarly, ancestor queries on the HR
datastore always give you the correct data. Both are wrapped in
transactions in the background, I believe.
The overview on http://code.google.com/appe
Thanks Ikai.
I'll probably go for your suggestion, and try to cache the indexes in
MemCache.
There are different kinds of searches:
1. String search in the spoken language translations of the signs. Most
often that is start-of-string, but it could also be end or part of string.
There are also
- With Python 2.7, I was able to start ./GoogleAppEngineLauncher.py
but could not create a project as it throwed a error saying, cannot
copy templates
--- After reading some link found that, SDK supports python 2.5
-- Installed Pyton 2.5.2
--- tried installing python-wxgtk2.5 python-wxtools
Hey Everyone,
I'm seeing a strange deployment error when uploading my app via "appcfg.py
update -V test ." with Python SDK 1.6.1 and Python 2.7.2+ on Ubuntu:
Cloning 212 static files.
Cloned 100 files.
Cloned 200 files.
Cloning 25 application files.
Rolling back the update.
Error 400: --- begin
26 matches
Mail list logo
