Re: [google-appengine] Re: Over index creation quota

2013-10-20 Thread Kaan Soral
If searchdatastore was true, I would definitely do that, search is more powerful However, it's unclear what are search's limits, first of all there is the 250gb index limit, even if that was elevated it's unclear whether it can perform as good as datastore There is also the cost issue, even if

Re: [google-appengine] Re: How to prevent overwriting an entity simultaneously?

2013-10-20 Thread Kaan Soral
The routines are mentioned are all get by key_name type of operations, eventual consistency shouldn't be an issue I've also checked the created fields in the datastore of the unknown replication issue I mentioned, they were differentiating below the millisecond, it also happened just once,

[google-appengine] Re: How to prevent overwriting an entity simultaneously?

2013-10-20 Thread Kaan Soral
After initial testing, I already love transactions, started generating some gotchas of my own, going to share them when I finish testing/modifications (for newbies to transactions like me) Before going deeper into transactions, I want to ask some questions: - Is there a downside of using

[google-appengine] vacuum_indexes is failing with yaml parsing error

2013-10-20 Thread Kaan Soral
I'm using 1.8.2 - didn't update yet as I have manual modifications to the sdk that takes time to replicate appcfg, after fetching indexes from appengine, throws the attached exception Could be a 1.8.2/1.8.6 incompatibility, if appengine's index response format have changed, if it is, I will

[google-appengine] logservice error

2013-10-20 Thread James Gilliam
python 2.7 -- getting errors from inside of GAE code ... 1. 2013-10-20 11:45:31.919 Traceback (most recent call last): 2. E2013-10-20 11:45:31.919 File /base/data/home/runtimes/python27/python27_lib/versions/1/google/appengine/api/app_logging.py, line 78, in emit 3.

Re: [google-appengine] Re: How to prevent overwriting an entity simultaneously?

2013-10-20 Thread Jeff Schnitzer
Yes, generally speaking if 50 requests like that come in at once you will eventually get the value increased by 50. The HRD can process approximately one transaction per second per entity group, so it might take 50 seconds. HOWEVER, there is a gotcha here. The retry count causes your code to

[google-appengine] Re: Google Apps No Longer Free

2013-10-20 Thread James Gilliam
Created a new google apps account so I can deploy another domain for my app ... When I signup for billing, I get a message An error has occurred. Dismiss. There is NO indication as to what the error is. As a result, I cannot setup billing and I suspect google will disable the google apps

Re: [google-appengine] why required bind in GQL ?

2013-10-20 Thread Vinny P
On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 2:34 AM, Vijay Kumbhani vnkumbh...@gmail.com wrote: i used *ndb.gql * give me examples without bound and with bound in GQL The decision of whether to bind parameters or not is generally an use-case specific issue. Before we discuss binding, you need to explain the

Re: [google-appengine] Re: Google Apps No Longer Free

2013-10-20 Thread Vinny P
On Sun, Oct 20, 2013 at 3:06 PM, James Gilliam jimgill...@gmail.com wrote: Created a new google apps account so I can deploy another domain for my app ... When I signup for billing, I get a message An error has occurred. Dismiss. There is NO indication as to what the error is. As a result,

[google-appengine] Re: vacuum_indexes is failing with yaml parsing error

2013-10-20 Thread husayt
I have the same on 1.8.6 On Sunday, 20 October 2013 19:52:27 UTC+1, Kaan Soral wrote: I'm using 1.8.2 - didn't update yet as I have manual modifications to the sdk that takes time to replicate appcfg, after fetching indexes from appengine, throws the attached exception Could be a

[google-appengine] how to filter query using dynamic parameters in NDB ?

2013-10-20 Thread Vijay Kumbhani
*In Google NDB docs...* - *they are given statically examples in documents * - *i have multiple AND OR conditions then how to filter query using dynamic parameters * -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To

[google-appengine] getting more apps

2013-10-20 Thread manuelaraoz
Hi. Can I have my limit raised once again? I'm at 18/20 applications still, but I want to plan ahead as I use GAE a lot to prototype sites for clients. Thanks, Manuel -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To unsubscribe from this

[google-appengine] getting more apps

2013-10-20 Thread manuelaraoz
Hi. Can I have my limit raised once again? I'm at 18/20 applications still, but I want to plan ahead as I use GAE a lot to prototype sites for clients. Thanks, Manuel -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To unsubscribe from this