Hi Vinny,
I added all the entries A and with address which Google asked me
to add in my domain. (hosting). so after that if I type the domain,it will
automatically to point to my application ?
or should I do anything else?
-V
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the
Hi Josh,
Google Groups isn't the place to post specific technical issues, as this
forum is meant more for general discussion of the platform and services.
If you would like help with a technical issue, you should post to
stackoverflow [1] or serverfault [2], as there are likely to be a lot
I'm no expert on JDO, but the low-level api does guarantee strong
consistency for get-by-key operations (that is, unless you explicitly ask
for eventual consistency). One of those SO responses suggested it is
possible to have the GAE/JDO plugin log its low-level operations - that
should at least
Hey Thomas,
I'm not in a position to say whether the scaling algorithm has changed, but
without knowing any details of your app's request load, historical request
load, scaling settings, etc. it's not possible to make any comment. The
scaling algorithm *could *change, since it's pretty
I am facings exact same issue. getObjectById returns stale data even if
call is made inside a transaction.
I performed an experiment - I ran two crons in two different modules, both
trying to increment their execution count in an (common, shared) entity. I
was shocked to see that even when I
Thanks, Jeff! And one more thing, it's pretty clear from the doc, but let
me make sure anyway. The same is true for ancestor queries, they guarantee
strong consistency even when not performed inside a transaction, right?
Thomas
On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 8:48 PM, Jeff Schnitzer j...@infohazard.org
Yes, that is correct. By default, if you perform a low-level get-by-key
operation, it is strongly consistent whether or not you put it in a
transaction.
Note that you can, if you want, explicitly request an eventually consistent
get-by-key operation in the low-level api. It does return faster
Having the token didn't fix my problem. I still can't uploads files. It
works only locally.
Please if anyone can help me to figure out what's going on it will be
really appreciated !
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google App Engine group.
To
Hi!
Does anyone have experiences to share regarding hosted CI providers and
Google App Engine. Currently I have my tests running locally using nose and
nose-gae. One provider I have been looking at is CircleCI. Seems quite
nice, they have instructions on how to set up testing with GAE.
Any
Hi,
I have an outstanding bill to pay (due to a card being cloned and therefore
cancelled) but I'd like to know if there is a way to pay the bill by
assigning it to a new billing account, transferring the balance if you will.
I understand I can just pay the bill with a new card (I think!) but
As a quick response:
uuid1() http://docs.python.org/2/library/uuid.html#uuid.uuid1 may
compromise privacy since it creates a UUID containing the computer’s
network address.
uuid4() http://docs.python.org/2/library/uuid.html#uuid.uuid4 creates a
random UUID.
Refer to this answer
My mistake. I removed 2 lines in settings.py :
MIDDLEWARE_CLASSES = (
'django.middleware.common.CommonMiddleware',
'django.middleware.csrf.CsrfViewMiddleware',
)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google App Engine group.
To unsubscribe from
What's your questions and what exactly have you tried? Unless you share
some minimal code that's causing the issue providing the details and asking
very specific questions - you won't be able to get much help.
On Monday, August 3, 2015 at 6:20:13 AM UTC+3, Ng Keng Wei wrote:
Hello,
I am
Salutations Paul,
I would contact our sales team https://cloud.google.com/contact/, they
can help with this.
Preface: not a billing expert
You will need to clear the old balance before you can move to the new
billing account. You cannot transfer the balance from one billing account
to
Hi Tasos,
I think there may be some issue in language between us, and my apologies in
advance if I've misunderstood you, since it seems some negations were added
/ omitted which would help me to make sense of your reply.
From what I understand about Apache, and remember this isn't an Apache
I have been having the same issue for 1 week. I contacted Google billing
support and cloud platform support. Support told me to make a $10 payment
to enable an increase in quota. After completing their request, they said
my quota has been increased to 25 projects. I still cannot create a new
Thank you for the post, sorry for the delay I was on vacation. I will
process the PIT shortly. Are you using https://appengine.google.com/ or
https://console.developers.google.com ?
On Wednesday, July 29, 2015 at 3:08:54 AM UTC-4, aswath wrote:
I have created the issue.
On Sun, Aug 2, 2015 at 10:57 PM, A. Kong anthony.hw.k...@gmail.com wrote:
When I deploy my app I got this error message:
*Instance class F4 is only allowed with the 'automatic' scaling value.*
Here is the beginning part of my yaml file
application: app-modular-kong
module: backend
I would take a look at this article
https://cloud.google.com/appengine/docs/java/datastore/jdo/queries,
specifically the second paragraph under 'Datastore Read Policy and Call
Deadline'.:
'
If the query uses an ancestor filter, you can use transactions
We use CircleCI and it is great for testing Python GAE apps. Here
(https://gist.github.com/SpainTrain/28fe7da692f5b9bf3266) is a gist for our
circle.yml, Makefile, .noserc, and requirements.txt as an example. We use
vendoring
Hi Nick,
That's what's strange. I've been using dwr_2.0.6/7 for a number of years,
and there's never been any *bee*.jar or *weblogic*.jar in my lib dir. To my
memory, there were no other dependencies downloaded with dwr.Yet prior
to 2015-07-18, I've never seen this exception, and the
Thanks for your quick reply, Ryan. I have found several postings on the Web
that describe the same problem, namely, GetObjectById returning stale data.
Here are two from StackOverflow:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/26377347/inconsistent-fetch-from-google-app-engine-datastore
Hi Ken,
It sounds as though this is a specific third-party technology unrelated to
Google, and I can't find it documented anywhere that this would be
available on the platform. It sounds as though your app itself would have
had to bundle this dependency when it was uploaded. Do you still have
If you can create a sample app that shows this post on it on the PIT
https://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/issues/entry so I can
investigate this further.
On Saturday, August 1, 2015 at 6:24:55 PM UTC-4, Thomas Becker wrote:
I am using the app engine datastore with Java JDO. According to
Thanks for the reply, Ryan. Actually, I need to apologize because the way I
described my problem was incorrect. I'm seeing stale data not from queries,
but from calls to the JDO function GetObjectById(). The calls are inside a
transaction. Since the analogous low-level datastore access function
There are a few reasons this could be happening. The most likely are:
1) The total_storage_limit is set too low in the queue.yaml
https://cloud.google.com/appengine/docs/python/config/queue#Python_Setting_the_storage_limit_for_all_queues
.
2) You are hitting a safety quota limit
26 matches
Mail list logo
