Re: [google-appengine] Re: Node.js Standard: memory usage different for locally and deployed version on 30 - 40 Mb.

Hi George. For me it's enough now, but exists such saying: there is no limit to perfection -:). I also made some optimizations therefore now I'm able to use most small instance. But if exists opportunity to improve that, of course would be still better. > 8 авг. 2018 г., в 22:41, 'George (Cloud

[google-appengine] Re: Google App engine with SSL does not work on Firefox

Thanks Katayoon, It is not seem to be my issue. Opened new tracker issue Vào 21:25:16 UTC+7 Thứ Tư, ngày 08 tháng 8 năm 2018, Binh Bui Van đã viết: > > Hi all, > > I have config ssl for Google App Engine (python standar). > It work perfect on chrome. > But with Firefox, it show 'Your connection

[google-appengine] Re: Google App engine with SSL does not work on Firefox

Hi Binh, You may take a look at this thread in Stack Overflow which seems to be similar to your issue. If the issue persists, I recommend to open a report in the Issue Tracker

[google-appengine] Re: "The process handling this request has unexpectedly died... (Error Code 203)"

Yep, and thanks for the info. Our 500 errors were due to the "process death" issue, though, and their latencies were well under the 60s deadline. So JFYI, I don't think the deadline exceeded error is related to what we're experiencing. I will investigate when I have a chance to see if our

[google-appengine] Will Pipelines and MapReduce libraries work on Python 3.7?

Will Pipelines and MapReduce libraries work on Python 3.7? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.

[google-appengine] Re: "The process handling this request has unexpectedly died... (Error Code 203)"

Hello Charles, In fact, I understand this part of your issue, and I believe that there is a good answer from Nick. However, my concern and my answer concerns to the HTTP 500 server error displayed in your screenshots. Sorry for do not let this clear. On Monday, August 6, 2018 at 8:54:35 PM

[google-appengine] Re: Node.js Standard Memcache Availability

Hello Daniel, It is not easy to predict when this or that feature is going to become available, as development time can depend on many factors and may change in the last moment. Only the date indicated in a public announcement is reliable. Work is undoubtedly being done meanwhile. Features

[google-appengine] Re: Public link disappeared for assets in bucket

This is the intended way for making data in Cloud Storage public through the Cloud Console. The documentation that you linked shows that [1]. And the Cloud IAM documentation elaborates on the 'allUsers' permission identifier for making data publicly accessible [2]. [1]

[google-appengine] Re: [URGENT] I have two applications under "No organisation" in google cloud platform with a similar source code but

Hello, Can you please provide the errors you are getting? And also provide at which point you are getting the errors. Is it when you try deploying the app? This will help determine possible causes for the issue. On Monday, August 6, 2018 at 7:07:30 AM UTC-6, Heisenberg wrote: > > The problem

Re: [google-appengine] Re: Node.js Standard: memory usage different for locally and deployed version on 30 - 40 Mb.

Hello Aleksander, Glad to read you find the solution working. Do you consider this solution as definitive? Would you like to see improvements? If so, what would the ideal solution mean for you? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine"

[google-appengine] Re: python 3.7 standard runtime release schedule?

It seems to be launched right now: https://cloud.google.com/blog/products/gcp/introducing-app-engine-second-generation-runtimes-and-python-3-7 On Wednesday, August 8, 2018 at 6:30:16 PM UTC+1, Eric G wrote: > > Is there a document that describes the differences between Python 3 > standard and

[google-appengine] Re: App engine to connect to Oracle on-premise instance

This looks like a duplicate of this Google Groups post -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from

[google-appengine] Re: python 3.7 standard runtime release schedule?

Is there a document that describes the differences between Python 3 standard and flex? At a quick glance at least the interface for Python 3 standard looks very similar to flex. Thanks. > > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine"

[google-appengine] Re: python 3.7 standard runtime release schedule?

Thanks! That's great news and very helpful links. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to

[google-appengine] Google App engine with SSL does not work on Firefox

Hi all, I have config ssl for Google App Engine (python standar). It work perfect on chrome. But with Firefox, it show 'Your connection is not secure' Any suggestions on what I might be doing wrong? Thanks -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google

Re: [google-appengine] Re: App Engine connect to Oracle instance running in on-premise

GAE Flexible. But, it is same as GCE as it runs on container based environment. But, we get cloud native benfits on GAE flexible over GCE. On Wed, Aug 8, 2018 at 9:59 AM, Attila-Mihaly Balazs wrote: > Hello, > > Just a small request for clarification: would that be Google App Engine >

[google-appengine] Re: Server Sent Events in GAE Standard

On Appengine, we've been using Pusher for this, but you could also look into Firebase Cloud Messaging. Regards, Roxana -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop

Re: [google-appengine] Re: Node.js Standard: memory usage different for locally and deployed version on 30 - 40 Mb.

Yes, it's better now, thanks. Before was difference from my PC and Cloud Platform about 20Mb, now 10Mb. On Wednesday, August 8, 2018 at 1:00:17 AM UTC+4, George (Cloud Platform Support) wrote: > > Hi Aleksander, > > The issue should be fixed by now; you are encouraged to test it again. > --