I am trying to follow the google tutorial at
https://cloud.google.com/appengine/docs/java/endpoints/calling-from-ios
But i get stuck at part 5
1.
Open a new Terminal window and invoke ServiceGenerator, pasting in the path
to the ServiceGenerator binary. As arguments, include the
Hello,
I have a non-user triggered process that queries the datastore for a dataset
of about 100k records, then loops through each record to update two other
entities in the datastore. What would be a good way to go about doing this?
I'm concerned about timing out and/or consuming more resources
If you route every request through a proxy, you are giving up all the
scalability benefits?
On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 12:17 PM, A. Stevko andy.ste...@gmail.com wrote:
I agree with Barry - setting up a proxy forwarder is the simplest
work-around when compared to porting a self managed app
the proxy will likely out perform the API itself.
This addresses my concern, and I agree, thank you :)
On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 3:47 PM, Barry Hunter barrybhun...@gmail.comwrote:
the proxy will
likely out perform the API itself.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to
You can't, see this thread: [google-appengine] creating a local copy of
application for development
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google App Engine group.
To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from
I was wondering to be honest, and finally decided that he wouldn't be asking
that given how many layers, complexity and different pieces are involved. To
answer that question, its all closed source I believe.
Baz
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
I'm selling spider legs and bat wings at half price...
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google App Engine group.
To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
It seems the world economic revolution and the dissolution of central banks
will have to wait for an updated sdk :(
On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 3:44 PM, Ikai L (Google) ika...@google.com wrote:
Guys, I want to encourage you to stay on topic.
The issue here is encryption for data store in App
. The less value one offers (i.e. simply uploading the files), the
more likely it is that they are in violation. I'm not sure I'm right, but I
offered the idea. It's because it's complicated that it takes 6 pages of
single-spaced text to explain it.
Baz
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 11:21 PM, Robin ro
and provides
lots of value, but you sold it in the same way, it seems that it would be
ok.
Baz
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 10:17 AM, Ikai L (Google) ika...@google.com wrote:
That's allowed. We're more permissive than restrictive with the terms of
service. Unless you are reselling the baseline App Engine
To be painfully clear, if I develop a stand-alone app that a customer will
pay me to deploy an instance of onto their own appengine account (with no
talking between other instances of the app) - that is allowed, correct? And
on top of it, they can't pull the code since I did the entire deployment
So not only do you have to know the ins and outs of the entire App Engine,
but you also have to be on top of world events and politics... hope you are
getting paid well Ikai! :)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google App Engine group.
To post to this
You don't, full-text search is being worked on but won't be available for a
long time. There are hacks and solutions but you will have to research and
poke around.
2010/4/28 Gleidson G Moura gleidson.gmo...@gmail.com
how to make this query in GQL?
select p.nome p.idade from Pessoa where
I do not understand why there is not at least a way to keep the apps
running. I would even pay for that.
On deck is the ability to pay for and have reserved a warmed instance:
http://code.google.com/appengine/docs/roadmap.html (3rd bullet)
Baz
--
You received this message because you
What was the conflict?
On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 3:01 PM, Felix E. Klee felix.k...@inka.de wrote:
Solved! Looks like I found the error: That possibly conflicting code
does *not* run in a transaction, and it should.
I'm glad that it's indeed me who is the idiot. ;-)
--
You received this
Hi,
A while back there were rumours of Google implementing native full-text
search in the GAE. What is the status of that? Is it on the roadmap? Being
considered? Deferred for an unknown date? Rejected?
Thanks!
Baz
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Started nice! Thanks... So how long can we expect here Google, couple of
weeks till it's done? :)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google App Engine group.
To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from
instance
to 11 - have I received the benefit of a warmed instance at every step of
the way? Is my twelfth instance now the warm one?
Cheers,
Baz
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google App Engine for Java group.
To post to this group, send email to google
and
oscillating back and forth between two instances. Whatever the situation, if
the solution were generalized like that, and most importantly not tied to a
SPECIFIC NUMBER of instances, it would be up to the user to decide how
important it was for them and whether to enable it.
Cheers,
Baz
Spam, don't give him clicks.
On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 4:37 PM, http://infopediaonlinehere.blogspot.com/
infopediaonlineh...@gmail.com wrote:
Here is an interesting topic
http://infopediaonlinehere.blogspot.com/2010/03/google-app-engine-technologies-google.html
--
You received this message
Technically you're not supposed to do that.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google App Engine group.
To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
solve
99% of the cases by simply waiting 3 minutes before serving a request.
Of course, I still love the GAE :)
Baz
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google App Engine for Java group.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine-j
While I have no need for this since I use and love SCM's, none of you
have made any reasonable point on why it should not be allowed. In
many other environments you can ftp code up and down, or basically get
the code the same way you put it up. No-one said the code should be
available for anyone
Now we're talking! Sorry I came off a little harsh, I just wasn't into
calling him a non-serious developer because he wanted to get at his
own code. I don't create a git repo for every little file I make (even
though I probably should!), and maybe his code is just for
experimentation without big
What's the ETA for the java environment to be production ready?
Cheers,
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google App Engine group.
To post to this group, send email to
Is ssl supported in GAE?
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google App Engine group.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
26 matches
Mail list logo
