I get the error:
Application statistics are currently unavailable.
in the control panel, and I can't see any statistics (including billing
information).
any ideas?
-g.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google App Engine for Java group.
To view this
Thanks for the release, but why don't you use Future?
-g.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google App Engine for Java group.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-appengine-java/-/3i3R-OpLvjAJ.
To post to
-rw-r--r-- 1 gmosx gmosx 127114 2011-04-24 16:21 gdata-client-1.0.jar
-rw-r--r-- 1 gmosx gmosx69903 2011-04-24 16:21 gdata-contacts-3.0.jar
-rw-r--r-- 1 gmosx gmosx 1448 2011-04-24 16:21
gdata-contacts-meta-3.0.jar
-rw-r--r-- 1 gmosx gmosx 548821 2011-04-24 16:21
I created a simple web app using the GPE wizzard (no GWT).
I added the Google Contacts API (using the wizzard in the beta GPE).
Then, I added the following line in my servlet:
ContactsService srv = new ContactsService(gmosx-test-1);
When I started the app I get the error:
Will it only be available for 'App Engine for Business'?
Currently we plan to make it available for all App Engine users
Nice! I thought this feature was restricted to GAEfB apps.
-g.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google App Engine for
This doesn't look like a pre-release SDK...
It's available in the downloads page as a final version.
-g.
Usually if you see a prerelease SDK, it means the final release is coming
in the next few weeks.
--
Ikai Lan
Developer Programs Engineer, Google App Engine
Blogger:
Now that containers such as JBoss and Tomcat are updated I am wondering if
Servlet 3.0 support is on the
GAE/J teams road map.
regards,
-g.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google App Engine for Java group.
To post to this group, send email to
- JDO - we've changed the documentation to show examples using the
low-level API and are working more closely with third-party library
developers. We've realized that there's a passionate community of open
source developers out there solving their own itch (itches that are likely
shared
started a new app. For me, Objectify made Java persistence coding fun
again, and words like persistence manager lifecycle and detached
instance are blissfully draining out of my vocabulary :-)
you may have a point here ;-)
-g.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed
Interesting,
I love seeing uncool but still useful features added in the SDK.
-g.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google App Engine for Java group.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine-j...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from
On Dec 4, 6:56 am, John Howe jhowe...@gmail.com wrote:
Is that another wave I see on the horizon ...
the news on the cloud-portability front are disappointing too:
https://jira.springsource.org/browse/ROO-1797
Remove support for DataNucleus 1.x and Google App Engine
Since none of Roo's
http://code.google.com/p/gwt-gae-channel/
excellent, thanks!
-g.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google App Engine for Java group.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine-j...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send
this library or any planned
alternatives
On Nov 23, 3:48 pm, George Moschovitis george.moschovi...@gmail.com
wrote:
Are there any plans to resume work on datanucleus-appengine?
The progress on this lib seems to have stopped 6 months ago and there
still a lot of related issues
Indeed, would be very useful!
-g.
On Dec 3, 6:18 pm, Ice13ill andrei.fifi...@gmail.com wrote:
Would be very very nice
On Dec 3, 11:00 am, dilbert dilbert.elbo...@gmail.com wrote:
It would be a nice feature to have in our GWT arsenal so I submitted
an issue
.
--
Ikai Lan
Developer Programs Engineer, Google App Engine
Blogger:http://googleappengine.blogspot.com
Reddit:http://www.reddit.com/r/appengine
Twitter:http://twitter.com/app_engine
On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 10:37 AM, George Moschovitis
george.moschovi...@gmail.com wrote:
We
You're eager optimizing your support problem, when really the problem you
should be solving is what do I need to build? How do I get there?
I know what I want to build. My problem is that I (obviously) need a
Datastore API. In the Google App Engine documentation
the endorsed API was (until now)
Looks interesting, thanks for releasing!
A pdf/.mobi version would be a great addition btw...
regards,
-g.
On Dec 3, 1:02 am, marius.andreiana marius.andrei...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi everyone,
I'm glad to announce a free, online GWT 2.1 GAE mini-book. It's
available
stopping permanently,
but I decided to use JDO so I have no choice but to depend on GAE's
use of DataNucleus.
Max Ross of Google seems to have disappeared from view since the end
of August. He did (and hopefully still does) lots of datastore-related
work.
On Nov 23, 2:48 pm, George
A great release!
thanks,
-g.
On Nov 19, 12:27 am, Ikai Lan (Google) ikai.l+gro...@google.com
wrote:
Hey everyone,
I just wanted to let everyone know that prerelease SDK 1.4.0 is out! Get it
from the Google Code project:
...
As usual, we value your feedback, so don't hesitate to evaluate
I am getting a similar error, very frustrating...
-g.
On Nov 9, 2:47 pm, Erik erik.e.wil...@gmail.com wrote:
I have also been getting constant deployment errors with Java
deployment for the past couple days, seems like something is funny on
the google side, don't think my connection is flaky:
annotation)
is to remap JPA entities onto Objectify entities but it very much
depends on your level of sophistication in the use of JPA.
regards
didier
On Oct 31, 10:08 pm, George Moschovitis
george.moschovi...@gmail.com wrote:
Is there a way to convert a JDO/JPA POJO
I have a simple class where the key needs a Parent and auto generated
long id component.
I am not sure hot to implement this with JPA/JDO, here is a hack I
tried:
@Entity
public class Account {
@Id
private Key key;
..
}
Account account = new Account();
So, isn't this possible in JPA?
-g.
On Oct 31, 11:05 pm, George Moschovitis
george.moschovi...@gmail.com wrote:
JDO supports the very useful .makePersistentAll() method. Is there an
equivalent method for JPA?
thanks,
-g.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed
JDO supports the very useful .makePersistentAll() method. Is there an
equivalent method for JPA?
thanks,
-g.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google App Engine for Java group.
To post to this group, send email to
Is there a way to convert a JDO/JPA POJO to the corresponding
Datastore Entity? I am sure this functionality exists in the JDO/JPA
implementation but is this exposed in a public API? (maybe through a
helper).
This would allow mixing calls to JDO/JPA with calls to the low-level
API for special
I guess one solution would be to make downloading optional. A setting
to disable source downloading in app.yaml would be safe, because
uploading a new version would destroy the existing code.
+1, please make this optional!
-g.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the
I am looking for a lightweight MVC framework specifically engineered
for GAE/J, preferably using Guice.
I am aware of google sitebricks but I am wondering if there are other
alternatives.
regards,
-g.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google App
great work!
-g.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google App Engine for Java group.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine-j...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
- Multitenancy is now supported in the datastore, allowing better
compartmentalization of user data.
Amazing! any info about how this might work?
-g.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google App Engine group.
To post to this group, send email
In the Java Runtime, no, at least for the moment. I put in a feature
request here:http://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/issues/detail?id=2070
argh, let's hope google will add this ASAP.
starred the issue!
-g.
--
http://www.appenginejs.org
--
You received this message because you are
Is it possible to apply url rewriting rules to static content?
Example mappings:
http://sub.myapp.com/* - http://www.myapp.com/sub/*
http://www.myapp.com/**/* - http://www.myapp.com/**/*.html
I can easily apply such mappings for dynamic content (using some kind
of middleware/filter). Is this
behaviors for OAuth vs Google accounts. The Google accounts returns
None while the OAuth version raises an exception if the user is not
logged in.
Robert
On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 3:18 PM, George Moschovitis
george.moschovi...@gmail.com wrote:
What about using get_current_user()?
yeah I
I was very pleased to see that the new OAuth API provides the same
interface as the Users API, but I see a missed opportunity here:
If we had a unified API, ie:
getCurrentUser()
returned the user either through sign-in or OAuth we could use one
code path for both cases...
Does this make sense?
What about using get_current_user()?
yeah I meant get_current_user()...
my problem is that there are two versions of the method:
google.appengine.api.oauth.get_current_user()
google.appengine.api.users.get_current_user()
one works with OAuth and one with sign-in (or am I wrong?).
I would
PS Of course I expect to hear about many more features next week :-)
I am dying to hear about this
one:http://code.google.com/events/io/2010/sessions/next-gen-queries-appen...
yeah, I would expect more from a release just before Google I/O.
-g.
--
You received this message because you are
If we want to switch an existing app from Google accounts to OpenID,
will we have to delete them and remake them?
Yeah, what happens with existing apps? I would like to switch them to
OpenID.
-g.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google App Engine
Should we create a new instance per query?
Or just use two instances (strong/eventual) for the whole app?
-g.
On Apr 2, 2:29 am, Ikai L (Google) ika...@google.com wrote:
That's correct. The cost of creating an instance is negligible, though. It's
not dissimilar to creating different
Seems like a *great* release!
-g.
--
http://www.appenginejs.org
On Mar 17, 9:07 am, Tristan tristan.slomin...@gmail.com wrote:
App Engine Java SDK - Release Notes
Version 1.3.2
=
- New API to read the contents of uploaded Blobs (fetch_data)
If you're serving
other files, you'll have to handle the ETag and If-None-Match headers
yourself, and I don't believe that we interfere with you doing this now.
OK, good to know, thanks.
-g.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google App Engine for
websites using HTTP proxies. Some proxies will cache the entire request,
which may cause session leak (e.g. let you read someone else's email).
On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 7:09 AM, George Moschovitis
george.moschovi...@gmail.com wrote:
I don NOT want to set an Expires header. I am just
Could you provide some code please?
What kind of code should I provide? I do NOT set the Expires header in
my code, and still GAE automatically adds the Expires header.
-g.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google App Engine for Java group.
To post
I noticed that the (live) Google App Engine server automatically adds
an Expires header to all responses in one of my apps.
I am not sure, but I *think* this behavior was introduced some time in
the last week.
I am sure that I do not send the Expires header, and the header is not
automatically
Hello,
I see the following error (INFO severity) in the logs of my app:
com.google.appengine.repackaged.com.google.common.base.FinalizableReferenceQueue
$SystemLoader loadFinalizer: Not allowed to access system class
loader.
Any idea?
-g.
On Feb 12, 7:55 pm, George Moschovitis george.moschovi...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hello,
I see the following error (INFO severity) in the logs of my app:
com.google.appengine.repackaged.com.google.common.base.FinalizableReference
Queue
$SystemLoader loadFinalizer: Not allowed
On Jan 19, 3:19 pm, John Patterson jdpatter...@gmail.com wrote:
You need to download the python sdk and use appcfg.py on your Java app.
I am on a mac and after downloading the sdk I ran the
AppEngineLanucher and created a new app with my Java app's id
then I ran appcfg.py vacuum_indexes
...
But, the blobstore emulation in the devserver creates new files (which
are not detected without restarting)
-g.
-aj
On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 9:53 AM, George Moschovitis
george.moschovi...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jan 14, 12:47 am, Jason (Google) apija...@google.com wrote:
I implemented
Thanks for the extra information re: your use of Narwhal. I don't have too
much experience with it, but can you implement the Blobstore docs demo
without Narwhal to see if it works for you as it does for me? This is the
doc I used to implement my version:
When testing my app with the DevServer I face the following problem:
If I add a new file in the war/ directory *after* the application has
started the application cannot access it:
java.security.AccessControlException: access denied
(java.io.FilePermission WEB-INF/src/path/to/newfile.ext read)
Thank you I will try this!
kind regards,
George.
On Dec 25, 10:24 am, Yasuo Higa higaya...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi George,
Is there a way to set the timezone for my application?
TimeZone.setDefault(TimeZone.getTimeZone(GMT-8:00));
Have you actually *tested* this on App Engine?
Yes.
Is there a way to set the timezone for my application?
TimeZone.setDefault(TimeZone.getTimeZone(GMT-8:00));
Have you actually *tested* this on App Engine?
This should be inserted in the servlet initialization code?
thank you,
-g.
If you use JSTL, try the following setup in web.xml:
Any ideas?
-g.
On Dec 23, 2:46 pm, George Moschovitis george.moschovi...@gmail.com
wrote:
Is there a way to set the timezone for my application?
I tried with the following setup in appengine-web.xml:
system-properties
property name=java.util.logging.config.file
system-properties
property name=java.util.logging.config.file value=WEB-INF/
logging.properties/
property name=user.timezone value=Europe/Athens/
/system-properties
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
The Image API is conveniently extended to support creation of Images
straight from the Blobstore, ie:
ImageServiceFactory.makeImageFromBlob(..)
After transforming the image by applying ImageAPI transformations, is
there a way to store the image back into the blobstore? A helper like:
good point...
-g.
On Dec 18, 6:29 pm, Stuart Moffatt stuartmoff...@gmail.com wrote:
Users interested in better BlobstoreService, please star the issue so it
gets more attention:
http://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/issues/detail?id=2536
Stuart
On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 11:23 AM, Stuart
It would be great if we could execute_transforms() directly back to a
blob and get a BlobInfo back?
+1 nice idea...
btw, how can we store the output of an image transform back into
blobstore?
is there an image api, or do we have to use urlfetch to POST the image
into the blobstore?
thanks,
This is a long awaited feature.
Some problems though:
- Instead of the serve() helper I would expect access to the blobs
through a url, something like:
http://my-app.appenginebs.com/blob-key
- No support for organization in directories
- A method to manipulate the uploaded blobs is missing
is interpreted by the infrastructure to cause it
to send the blob back to the user.
What does 'interpreted' mean? is the actual file served from a
separate infrastructure optimized for static files (in the future
maybe from a CDN)?
I would like to skip the dynamic request to the application,
Part of the infrastructure between the user and your code sees the blobstore
header in your response, and replaces the response with the contents of that
blob.
OK,
Another thing, how could I use the Images api on an uploaded image
before storing it to the blobstore.
Would I have to emulate a
The release also includes some performance tweaks to the Java runtime.
I *think* the new runtime is considerably faster when running Rhino
(JavaScript) applications.
Great job!
-g.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google App Engine for Java group.
Is there a way to add 'lifecycle' callbacks to Datastore models? For
example oncreate, ondelete, etc methods to be executed before
inserting/deleting the model?
thanks,
-g.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Thanks, didn't know about that.
Is this feature available on GAE/Java ?
-g.
On Nov 10, 1:33 pm, djidjadji djidja...@gmail.com wrote:
Have you looked at the hooks.
http://code.google.com/appengine/articles/hooks.html
2009/11/10 George Moschovitis george.moschovi...@gmail.com
This seems like a very low level solution.
A simpler hook mechanism for the datastore would be useful.
-g.
On Nov 10, 1:33 pm, djidjadji djidja...@gmail.com wrote:
Have you looked at the hooks.
http://code.google.com/appengine/articles/hooks.html
2009/11/10 George Moschovitis
Hi,
what is the suggested way to emulate an SQL LIKE 'prefix%' query using
the low level Datastore API?
thanks,
George.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google App Engine for Java group.
To post to
FYI, I fixed the problem with a little patch in narwhal (the commonjs
implementation used by Jack):
narwhal/engines/rhino/lib/binary-engine.js
exports.B_DECODE_DEFAULT = function(bytes, offset, length) {
return String(new Packages.java.lang.String(bytes, offset, length,
UTF-8));
}
OK, I will try to set the HTTP header, but I don't think this is the
problem.
I have set the header but the problem is *not* fixed!
Any other ideas?
This is a show-stopper bug :( :(
-g.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed
But if the file with local characters is inside src\... dir, there
is everythign fine. This is sufficient for me.
saddly, this is not sufficient for me :(
I am still looking for a way to fix the encoding problem in files that
reside in war/
quite interestingly in my HTML files I have some
' functionality, though - it bills
you directly, so there's no need to send an invoice.
-Nick Johnson
On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 8:38 AM, George Moschovitis
george.moschovi...@gmail.com wrote:
If you need further help, the people in the Google Checkout Merchants
Forum are probably better placed to help
If you need further help, the people in the Google Checkout Merchants
Forum are probably better placed to help
you:http://groups.google.com/group/google-checkout-merchants-forum?pli=1
But Google Checkout provides the billing infrastructure.
Google App Engine is the Merchant, that should send
Perhaps this forum is for developers only. Where should I ask this
question?
-g.
On May 13, 1:21 pm, George Moschovitis george.moschovi...@gmail.com
wrote:
Does Google provide invoices for billed resources?
Are these invoices compatible with EU regulations? The following
fields
Does Google provide invoices for billed resources?
Are these invoices compatible with EU regulations? The following
fields are required in the invoice:
- Businessname, Adress and VAT Number of the billing party (google)
- Businessname, Adress and VAT Number of the paying party (our
company)
-
70 matches
Mail list logo
