I don't have time to test this just now, and I hate to waste bandwidth
on what (so far) is just idle speculation, but I did spot what looks
like a potential security. I figured it'd be better to share it with
the group than sit on it until I actually *do* have time to confirm/
deny.
On Feb 16,
Just a gut reaction...shouldn't that be self.request.post?
On Feb 20, 2:39 am, jeremy jeremy.a...@gmail.com wrote:
so using netcat as a dummy host, i've confirmed the client is sending
the data i expect:
POST /_datum/blaaah.bin HTTP/1.1
I get this [well, the error about strop...I haven't noticed the fcntl
one] on XP running through cygwin, using the source code .zip (as
opposed to the msi, in case that makes any difference).
I'm about 50% certain that it's coming from the SDK, but it could
easily be coming from some built-in
On Feb 16, 5:52 pm, Alexander Konovalenko alex...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 04:25, Sridhar Ratnakumar
sridhar.ra...@gmail.com wrote:
A related question - is there a way to have two versions of datastore
so that I can run 'production' and 'staging' instances of my app? In
Google Groups doesn't give me any option to directly reply to this
post. We'll see how this approach works.
When this error came up, I wrote a scathing flame. And then I threw
it away, mainly because it just isn't productive.
Overriding the has_key() method seems like one of the least
That did the trick. Thank you [both]
On Jan 26, 2:50 am, Blixt andreasbl...@gmail.com wrote:
Looks to me like there's three spaces in front of static_dir:
static. Try removing one of the spaces so that there are only two.
Regards,
Andreas
On Jan 26, 5:41 am, James Ashley james.ash
Those are all fine options. But the real answer is to write 2 or
3 .BAT files (start your server, upload, and *save to source control*
-- that's the most important one) and install the Windows Command
Prompt Here extension.
:-/
Good luck,
James
On Jan 19, 6:10 pm, djidjadji
This sounds to me like something that should be reported as a bug.
And whoever wrote that error message should be punished with at least
10 papercuts.
But that's just me. G
On Jan 11, 3:33 pm, murexconsult...@googlemail.com
robin_ow...@hedge-row.co.uk wrote:
There was a bug in my app and some
Isn't production running 2.5.ish?
On Jan 12, 8:39 pm, bijiasuo2...@gmail.com bijiasuo2...@gmail.com
wrote:
you should install Python 2.6.1
i have successful, but i don't know why. I don't know Python
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you
On Jan 12, 9:06 pm, jay j...@jaykyburz.com wrote:
I thought google was participating in Open ID now? Do our app engine
logins support OpenID's?
OpenID still seems...fairly immature and not user friendly.
Then again, it's been a while since I tried to use it. I probably
have the terminology
The simple answer seems to be override the db class. That's
totally off the top of my head, and it may be completely unrealistic.
Something like (totally untested and almost definitely wrong. Consider
it pseudo-code):
class my_db(google.ext.db):
def put(self, *objects, **kwargs):
for o
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine/browse_thread/thread/2baa48709bb94bd3?hl=en
has an excellent answer about dispatching to multiple WSGI apps.
On Jan 17, 12:11 pm, James Ashley james.ash...@gmail.com wrote:
I really don't know much about WSGI, but this works for me.
As I
On Jan 17, 11:17 am, hawkett hawk...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Marzai,
Thanks for the detailed response. It would be great to get those
clarifications included in the terms of service and/or privacy
policy. I can see from my post rating that some people don't share my
concern, but data
On Jan 17, 2:54 pm, Andy Freeman ana...@earthlink.net wrote:
data privacy is probably the number one barrier to
commercial cloud adoption at the moment.
Some supporting evidence would be nice because only one person is
raising this concern. Maybe it's so huge a barrier that no one else
I'm not real clear where the various errors are happening, so I'm just
guessing.
Just based on what I'm seeing here, it looks like you're having
javascript (client-side) issues. Something about DTC? Maybe it's a
variable that isn't getting initialized? Or maybe a constant that
needs quotes
On Jan 4, 6:04 pm, djidjadji djidja...@gmail.com wrote:
I have done a few tests and found that the number of items in the
datastore does not influence the number of mega-cycles it takes to
fetch, create, delete items.
That's good to know, thank you.
I'll never forget the time I handed a
On Jan 1, 12:17 pm, Andy Freeman ana...@earthlink.net wrote:
For a number of possible reasons (including the consistency of a
running balance), an accounts engine might have a basic specification
requirement that invoices are generated in sequence with ascending
invoice numbers *and*
Just for clarification:
There seems, to me, to be a big distinction between support for large
files (to me, that sounds like serving bigger files that I upload via
appcfg) and supporting large files uploaded by end-users (which, to
me, implies letting the web app store data in bigger BLOBs).
It
Check out assembla.com. It has both source control hosting (give
mercurial a try...it's a lot more flexible than SVN, the the GUI
options still have their quirks) and project management features
(which is what it sounds like you want).
(Note: I'm not affiliated with them at all. Just a happy
import models vs. from models import *:
There might be some low-level nuance differences, but the important
one (to me) is your module's name space.
If you do from blah import * you wind up with everything in the
other module. This *may* be what you want, but it usually isn't. If
there's
Maybe I'm missing something. But it doesn't seem like it would take
much effort to write a script to automate it.
Something along the lines of:
instance_names = ('a', 'b', 'c',...)
for name in instance_names:
# change the instance name in app.yaml
# call appcfg.py
You'd probably want to
Marzia,
I don't want to seem disagreeable, unappreciative, or anything like
that. But I really have to agree with Ben on this one.
It seems to me that this change introduces a bug. I've been using
python for 8 years now, and I can't think of any reason for a has_key
method to take only one
22 matches
Mail list logo
