On Feb 2, 10:18 am, Jonathan Feinberg wrote:
> My attempt to access the URL
>
> http://appengine.google.com/dashboard?app_id=wordle
>
> Results in
>
> Error: Server Error
FYI, I cleared my cookies, and was able to get in. I still consider
this a show-stopper.
My attempt to access the URL
http://appengine.google.com/dashboard?app_id=wordle
Results in
Error: Server Error
The server encountered an error and could not complete your
request.
If the problem persists, please report your problem and mention
this error message and the query t
On Jun 23, 10:04 am, "Nick Johnson (Google)"
wrote:
> > Am I write in my understanding that by the time these Exporter methods
> > are called, the entities have already been transferred in some opaque
> > (and presumably efficient) form from GAE to the client?
>
> Correct - the bulkloader uses r
On Jun 23, 9:57 am, "Nick Johnson (Google)"
wrote:
> Raw strings (that is, ones that aren't unicode) can contain any data,
> including blobs, and all the conversion functions should return raw strings.
> You can then override output_entities to output the data to the format of
> your choice.
Huz
On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 9:26 AM, Nick Johnson (Google) <
nick.john...@google.com> wrote:
> Check out the source code for the Exporter in the bulkloader:
> http://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/source/browse/trunk/python/google/appengine/tools/bulkloader.py#3308.
> The docstrings describe how
On Jun 23, 9:13 am, GenghisOne wrote:
> def get(self, display_type, pic_key):
I'm afraid I still don't see how this addresses my question about
download_data.
http://code.google.com/appengine/docs/python/tools/uploadingdata.html#Downloading_Data_from_App_Engine
--~--~-~--~~---
On Jun 23, 8:57 am, GenghisOne wrote:
> Here's a sample that might provide some value to you...
>
> http://code.google.com/p/google-app-engine-samples/source/browse/trun...
I couldn't find any reference to download_data there; which file
defines the exporter?
--~--~-~--~~---
On Jun 23, 8:13 am, "Nick Johnson (Google)"
wrote:
> No, just whatever suits you best. You can write them in binary, or to
> separate files, if you want.
In reading the documentation for
appcfg.py download_data
, which is what I'm talking about here, I don't see any sample code or
document
> It's not clear what you're asking. On the way out of what?
On the way out of App Engine. :)
Is there a preferred "correct" way to encode blobs in an exporter?
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Googl
On Jun 22, 2:29 pm, Tony wrote:
[snip]
> Hope that's more helpful.
I'm hoping that someone who actually knows the answer--someone with
google.com in their email address--will contribute to this thread.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you
On Jun 22, 2:18 pm, Tony wrote:
> If you add a property such as: created_at = db.DateTimeProperty
> (auto_now_add=True) to the models you are moving, you could then query
> on that property to find entities created during any timeframe.
That's true. What does that have to do with appcfg.py downl
How should we deal with blobs on the way out? Should we build
(potentially large) Base64 strings?
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google App Engine" group.
To post to this group, send email to google-
I'm moving my application off of GAE.
I'd like to download all of my data, develop and deploy the new
implementation, then get the rest of the data, which had been created
in the meantime. Is there a way to do so?
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message bec
On Apr 9, 1:21 pm, Adam Sah wrote:
> In the meantime, you might consider Google Base
You know, I was going to tell you to get real, but that's not so
crazy. I have two questions for you:
Google base correctly handles unstructured text in its index, with
stemming and legitimate scoring, etc.?
Long ago I attracted a flame-fest when I expressed my opinion that
adding support for other programming languages should be given less
priority than fixing bugs and adding infrastructural features. Here we
are, months later, and the big announcements are
1) Java (my God, why?)
and
2) Cron j
Wordle is also getting spurious quota denials. I hope someone at
Google is awake and full of Starbucks.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google App Engine" group.
To post to this group, send email to g
Excuse me; I replied to the wrong thread.
On Nov 17, 2:27 pm, Jonathan Feinberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yes, I'd already written my own static content server, but I'm
> thinking that Google should handle that.
>
> On Nov 15, 8:40 am, Sylvain <[EMAIL PROTECTED
Yes, I'd already written my own static content server, but I'm
thinking that Google should handle that.
On Nov 15, 8:40 am, Sylvain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi, I've update the idea from ipsojobs.
>
> Now it uses memcache and can handle many directories and file types.
> You have to flush mem
Google people, any chance of turning on these simple methods for
contributing to cacheability?
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google App Engine" group.
To post to this group, send email to google-app
On Oct 6, 11:20 am, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Regardless if the limitations are by design
> or not it is virtually unusable by 99% of all developers.
>From which hat are you pulling that number? Source?
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this
On Oct 4, 6:20 pm, Nash <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Great article Aral,
>
> My strong suggestion at this stage to anyone considering GAE for a
> production, business use DO NOT USE GAE.
I just replied to this same post in a different thread, not realizing
it had been posted to this one as well
On Oct 4, 6:20 pm, Nash <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My strong suggestion at this stage to anyone considering GAE for a
> production, business use DO NOT USE GAE.
Unless, of course, you can't find anything else with the same scaling
properties, ease of use, and pleasure of development. Then do.
On Oct 2, 2:59 am, Bill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Feris, Wordle.net is Jonathan's site so I don't have any info other
> than looking at the web pages. It looks the image thumbnails are
> image blobs stored in datastore and the java applet displays graphics
> on individual gallery pages.
Corre
On Sep 30, 5:21 am, "Feris Thia" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I understand that GAE is still in preview used only, but I just wonder if
> anyone has used it in any semi or full production ? And with how many page
> hits / visitors per day ?
Yesterday was a good day; my app got 89,537 pageviews,
Any attempt to get to my app's (wordle) dashboard is met with "Server
Error (500)". Anyone else?
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google App Engine" group.
To post to this group, send email to google-a
On Sep 8, 4:01 pm, Bill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This is a fairly cool Google idea:http://blogs.zdnet.com/BTL/?p=9937
>
> Personally, I think my apps would like to be hosted just offshore of
> Maui.
How about you move me to Maui, then host my apps in my house in
Medford, MA?
--~--~-
On Sep 9, 7:05 am, jago <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> How I got the image I wrote here: image = self.request.get('image')
Try
image = self.request.str_POST['image']
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Group
As documented, no.
http://code.google.com/appengine/docs/python/sandbox.html
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google App Engine" group.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googleg
On Sep 3, 9:38 am, "Matt Dragon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Reported as an
> issue:http://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/issues/detail?id=689
Please, everyone, go star that bug.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the
> And Google is not in competing with the free or obscure services, they
> are competing for the business market with Amazon, Microsoft and soon
> Yahoo! and likely others as well.
I missed where anyone from Google claimed to be looking for businesses
to develop their commercial applications on A
30 matches
Mail list logo
