Hi there,
I just changed the name of one of my models, which means I need a new
index. Even though there are no entries of this type though, the index
is stuck at the Building state. Could someone from Google take a
look?
My appid is relayapp and the index is Comment.
thanks a lot!
Michael
This fixed itself, although I still have one (old) index in Error that
I can't delete.
Is it typical for an index for a new model to take a few hours to
build? I thought the building process would only apply if existing
entities had to be indexed?
thanks
Michael
On Apr 24, 9:22 am, Michael
The zip hasn't been updated in a while, so you'll need to get the
latest version from subversion:
http://code.google.com/p/google-app-engine-django/source/checkout
cheers
Michael
On Mar 15, 3:58 am, Coonay fla...@gmail.com wrote:
where can i get r72?
the latest is just
://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine/browse_thread/thread/...
-Marzia
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 4:01 AM, Michael O'Brien mich...@mcobrien.orgwrote:
Hi,
I'm still testing my app, so it only has a small amount of test data
in it right now (maybe 200 small entities max). I hadn't paid much
Hi,
I'm still testing my app, so it only has a small amount of test data
in it right now (maybe 200 small entities max). I hadn't paid much
attention to the Stored Data figure on the dashboard page until now
since today for the first time it looks like I actually owe money (1
cent, but hey it's
Hi Kev,
I wouldn't worry too much about querying vs. db.get - if you're
concerned about the performance measure both approaches so you can see
the difference for your app.
As for combining the templates though, you could just add square
brackets around the linked_item in SingleItem:
values =
Hi Ritesh,
the problem is that specifying dataType: xml doesn't tell jQuery it
should send the data in XML, just that it should expect XML to be
returned from the url. You need to construct the XML yourself and set
the contentType option to text/xml to actually send your data as
XML.
Hi Lee,
according to the roadmap, support for large files (and, I'd guess, as
many files as you want to pay for) is coming between now and June:
http://code.google.com/appengine/docs/roadmap.html
Until then, your best bet is probably Amazon S3.
cheers
Michael
On Mar 9, 12:11 am, Lee Olayvar
Your signin view should probably redirect to the overview rather than
just writing the template.
So you could use something like:
def overview(request):
return return_to_response('overview.html')
def signin(request):
return HttpResponseRedirect(reverse(overview))
cheers
Michael
On Mar
Do some of the entities share a common parent? Writes to entities
within a group are serialized and if there is too much contention on a
group writes to its members will fail.
Michael
On Feb 18, 3:41 pm, Nikola ntos...@gmail.com wrote:
I am trying to go through all entities of a kind, using
I would imagine the 10MB is for static files that are served directly
by your app...
Michael
On Feb 13, 1:55 pm, Neves marcos.ne...@gmail.com wrote:
The new HTTP request/response limit is 10MB, but the datastorage limit
still 1MB. So, if I upload a 10MB file, I need to split it em 10MB
parts
Hi Matija,
I found this part of the new docs a bit confusing as well, and I'd
appreciate some clarification if anyone from Google is available.
My guess though is that the 30 active requests means up to thirty
python processes running at any one time. Since each process can only
serve a single
Guessability could be a problem if guessing a URL might allow someone
access to something that should be hidden, or if it would allow
someone to trawl through your entire datastore for some reason (e.g.
to crawl it, costing you resources).
If you secure your pages anyway, or if you're happy to
) be happy to be crawled.
Am I interpreting it correctly?
On Feb 12, 8:48 am, Michael O'Brien mich...@mcobrien.org wrote:
Guessability could be a problem if guessing a URL might allow someone
access to something that should be hidden, or if it would allow
someone to trawl through your entire
14 matches
Mail list logo
