FYI, here's Brandon's post:
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/google-appengine/6xAV2Q5x8AU/discussion
and two related issues you may be inclined to star (with more info in
the comments as well):
http://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/issues/detail?id=2258
My app (adb2) is getting over quota errors and is no longer serving
requests. This has never happened before. According to the dashboard
my app has used 34 instance hours to process under 100 requests which
I can't imagine is possible under normal circumstances (especially
since the app doesn't
On May 11, 5:27 pm, Greg g.fawc...@gmail.com wrote:
Actually the way I see it is that Google has given us a free ride for
three years...
Well, actually, Google got lots of developers to test their platform
and various service API roll-outs for free for three years. It's been
pretty much of a
sorry, there's a typo...
the line:
image_data =
googimg.execute_transforms(output_encoding=images.JPEG)
should be
image_data =
img.execute_transforms(output_encoding=images.JPEG)
the issue is the same though...
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the
I hope this is useful information for someone who has encountered
this:
If you upload an image via the blobstore that is, say, 1000x800 and
then attempt to resize using the following:
img = images.Image(blob_key=str(blob_key))
img.resize(1000,1000)
image_data
It appears to be stuck at version 1.3.5
It has been useful in the past mainly for use in Eclipse as a
reference with Pydev, but lately it's been out of date so much that it
kind of seems pointless to even make the repository public. I'm
assuming there must be some kind of Byzantine build process
Can't upload a new version either: 500 internal server error
The dashboard is inaccessible as well.
App is slow but works.
On Jun 26, 9:55 pm, gg bradjyo...@gmail.com wrote:
Seems to be just the admin...
On Jun 26, 9:52 pm, Tom Wu service.g2...@gmail.com wrote:
Server Error
A server
I tried just removing the queue name from queue.yaml but the queue
still seems to exist with a rate and bucket size set to 'paused'.
If it isn't now, will it be possible to delete or rename queues in the
future? The reason I ask is because I created a test queue with a
crazy name and would rather
Thank you!
These are really great new features.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google App Engine group.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this
Hi Jeff,
This seems to happen on pretty much every release. I sort of figured
the repository would always have the latest and the zip/installer
download would, if anything, trail it slightly. Otherwise what is the
point of exposing the svn repository if it's out of date with respect
to the
Awesome, thanks Jeff. I think doing it this way would make my app use
less resources in general which is good for everybody.
- Claude
On Mar 26, 2:25 pm, Jeff S j...@google.com wrote:
Hi Claude,
On Mar 25, 8:27 pm, cz czer...@gmail.com wrote:
The reason I ask this is for the following
over 2000 ms CPU quota.
BTW I'm fairly convinced that memcached data doesn't get flushed out.
On Mar 24, 6:27 am, cz czer...@gmail.com wrote:
I added some timing code to see how expensive a cold app startup is.
This is a Django1.x app so YMMV.
The typical numbers are:
Zipimport
I added some timing code to see how expensive a cold app startup is.
This is a Django1.x app so YMMV.
The typical numbers are:
Zipimport of Django: 180ms
Appengine-django-helper monkeypatching: 430ms
Misc imports, app-specific patching, etc: 20ms
see:
http://docs.djangoproject.com/en/dev/ref/middleware/#module-django.middleware.common
http://www.djangosnippets.org/snippets/601/
in your settings.py:
APPEND_SLASH = False
On Mar 14, 5:01 am, gxtiou gxt...@gmail.com wrote:
i don't want it to redirect to: http://www.abc.com/login/; added
The datastore seems to be unusually zippy today, whatever you googly
types did yesterday sure worked. Beautiful!
thanks,
- Claude
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google App Engine group.
To post to
Actually, that is normal behavior. This has been discussed in previous
threads.
GAE seems to aggressively purge it's app cache, average app lifetime
appears to be under 2 seconds. Appengine-patch may be marginally
faster but both require Django1.x to be imported via zipimport, which
is pretty
Our app is still experiencing at least double the latency as compared
to last week and the app is basically unusable. I'm really concerned
about this since the GAE team has stated that the latency issue has
been resolved.
This is so disappointing if the current performance is considered to
be
Latency is still pretty much killing our site. Dynamic pages that took
1-3 seconds (which is bad enough) before the slowdown still take 10-20
seconds. The app dashboard is super sluggish as well (as Nick pointed
out). I'm hoping this means that the GAE team is still working on it
(if so, thanks
yep, our app still quite a bit slower than usual but slightly better
than earlier today.
zipimport still seems especially slow... I'm wondering if using non-
trivial 3rd party frameworks such as Django 1.x is such a good idea on
GAE. With this kind of latency I'm thinking maybe not. Perhaps for
I think you could upload a different version (set it app.yaml) with
profiling enabled and test using that version (on your live
datastore). The default (non-profiled) version would still be what the
public normally sees.
On Feb 20, 5:51 am, Jarek Zgoda jarek.zg...@gmail.com wrote:
Since
It would indeed be great to have some kind of way to store big binary
blobs such as images etc. that are larger than 1mb without having to
resort to using a third party storage solution like Amazon's S3. I'm
under the impression though that Google is working on this (see
roadmap).
On Feb 16,
Awesome possum!
Although having to deal with the more restrictive quotas before was
probably a good thing in that it made us think more about efficiency
and scalability.
thanks,
- Claude
On Feb 14, 11:36 am, Nash-t timna...@gmail.com wrote:
Nah, this is your reward for betting with Google and
Um, this might be a dumb question, but the SVN source tree doesn't
seem to reflect the latest version. It looks like it's stuck at r34
which according to the release notes is version 1.1.8.
Is there a new repository or am I hallucinating?
I usually just get the latest version via SVN but this
I'm sure this is something stupid on my end but I just can't see it...
everything worked fine until I checked out the latest versions of GAE
and appengine helper (r41, r74).
On startup (in main.py) I get this exception:
...\appengine_django\__init__.py in InstallModelForm()
515 Replace
Oh, and here's what the beginning of main.py looks like:
# Standard Python imports.
import os
import sys
import logging
import settings
# Fix (hack) for missing unlink
if os.name == 'nt':
os.unlink = lambda: None
from appengine_django import InstallAppengineHelperForDjango
Thanks, I was looking at those threads, but I think my problem is
unrelated since the module in question is accessible via PYTHONPATH
and shouldn't have anything to do with skipped files. Also, as I
stated previously, I have the latest version of GAE and the django
helper checked out (r41 and r74
use appcfg without specifying severity to get just request logs:
appcfg.py --email=youremail request_logs yourappdir
On Feb 9, 12:45 pm, Greg g.fawc...@gmail.com wrote:
On Feb 10, 2:16 am, Duncan kupu...@googlemail.com wrote:
Logs generated on the server tell you how often particular
I have noticed that the app cache does not keep things around for much
more than a few seconds, so if your site gets relatively little
traffic it will have more problems than if it gets heavier traffic
(paradoxically). Also, if your app returns pages with many images or
other embedded content
This is really great! I just want you (google engineers) how much I
appreciate your work on this. GAE is a really fun platform to use.
Despite all the whining (a lot from me) it's turning into a great
product, plus the fact that it's free (well, for smaller apps) is
amazing.
Well, ok, one more
Hi Marzia,
I've been unable to make the chat times, is there a transcript
archived somewhere?
Thanks,
- Claude
On Jan 7, 11:56 am, Marzia Niccolai ma...@google.com wrote:
Details about this and future chat times can be found
So far, for me App Engine has worked pretty well.
The issue regarding Django 1.0 is a little more complicated than just
use zipimport and django helper which is the standard response. While
this works and is in fact what I use, there are some issues. One is
that if your app doesn't have a lot of
frameworks
there would be a high likelihood that it is always in memory.
I'm using Django 1.0 now on appengine without any other issues besides
that. CPU quotas are really tight right now, so it makes sense to
minimize expensive events. That's all I'm sayin'
On Dec 19, 1:54 am, cz czer...@gmail.com
I'm getting 404/not found for http://appengine.google.com/ which was
how I accessed the dashboard up until last night.
Also, my app (adb2) is returning spurious 500 server errors and random
404/not found, but it worked fine up until the system maintenance
period. This app was last deployed
This is fantastic, thanks Marzia!
There also seems to be a fair amount of clamor for beefing up the
Image API, any chance that might be in the pipeline?
Also, I would like to suggest that the documentation be fattened up,
especially concerning the inner workings of datastore/BigTable and
the following feature
request:http://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/issues/detail?id=435but your
idea may be slightly different. Feel free to star this one, or file a
new issue :)
Thank you,
Jeff
On Oct 9, 10:25 pm, cz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If there was just one thing to add
If there was just one thing to add to the Image api, a way to
determine the image size would be highest on my list.
It just seems so easy to add... would it not be possible to stuff a
couple of integers (height,width) along with the image data into the
image service response ProtocolMessage?
The offending index eventually was purged and I'm now able to
upload... It appears that the offline processing of indexes is just
kind of slow.
- Claude
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google App
37 matches
Mail list logo
