Same issue:
The High Cpu Http Request was up to 92% and is now down to 85%
It looks like an app engine reporting malfunction
On Oct 7, 6:43 pm, Sargis Dallakyan wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> I just checked my app and noticed a new entry called High Cpu Http
> Requests in the Dashboard. When I click on
e:
Select * from Calendar where beginDate >= beginofDateRange and endDate
<= endofDateRange
How could I do that? How does Google Calendar do that?
Thanks,
Rick
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
&q
On Apr 9, 3:24 am, Jeff S wrote:
> Hi Andrei,
>
> This is covered in the FAQ:
read as: "blah blah, first 10,000 only, blah blah"
This is Bullshit.
Sorry to use such harsh language, but this is really terrible customer
interaction.
Would it kill Google to change the result of the sign up page
Well looks like I owe you an enormous apology.
I'm sorry. I was wrong.
But that then begs the question (since this is _Google_ we're talking
about).
Why on earth isn't this automated???
On Apr 22, 2:30 am, Rick wrote:
> Hi Rick,
>
> We're still sending out act
Well looks like I owe you an enormous apology.
I'm sorry. I was wrong.
But that then begs the question (since this is _Google_ we're talking
about).
Why on earth isn't this automated???
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed
n would be very much appreciated.
Rick
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google App Engine" group.
To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
google-appengine+unsubscr
gt;
> Robert
>
>
>
> On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 16:57, Rick Horowitz wrote:
> > I'm finding the JDO cursor usage documentation a bit confusing.
> > According to the docs
> > athttp://code.google.com/appengine/docs/java/datastore/queriesandindexe...
>
> &g
HTML document, which would be functionally equivalent. If you
> used ranges and offsets, you'd have to store page state anyway client side.
>
>
>
> On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 8:38 AM, Rick Horowitz wrote:
> > I'm using a GWT UI. Is the recommended best practice to cache already
m looking for guidance on which would be most secure out of these
options, or if anyone has a better suggestion.
Thanks for any help on this,
Rick Horowitz
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google App Engine" group.
To post to this gro
> I would
> not recommend just the memcache as it will/could eventually get
> flushed.
Very true, you're right. I hadn't thought about it being flushed.
> Most people would probably just hard code it on the App
> Engine server code. It might be a little more secure or closer to
> Authorize.net'
ying
to make this scale :-)
Thanks in advance for any feedback or suggestions.
Rick
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google App Engine" group.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from thi
Couldn't agree more. Bugs should be responded to in days or hours, not
weeks.
On Nov 21, 7:13 am, pdknsk wrote:
> The correct link to the announcement by Google.
>
> http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine/msg/1cfb04d97d6634ac
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to t
Hello,
The day before our app is scheduled to go live, of course, I suddenly
started seeing errors in the log like this:
com.google.apphosting.api.ApiProxy$ApiDeadlineExceededException: The
API call memcache.Set() took too long to respond and was cancelled.
And nothing is working at all. There
Pushing out a new build seems to have revived the app.
On Jan 23, 12:09 am, Rick Mangi wrote:
> Hello,
>
> The day before our app is scheduled to go live, of course, I suddenly
> started seeing errors in the log like this:
>
> com.google.apphosting.api.ApiProxy$ApiDeadlineExce
http://www.quickmeme.com/meme/35zzsl/
On Feb 7, 3:27 pm, "Ikai Lan (Google)" wrote:
> http://www.quickmeme.com/meme/35xwv3/(great series if you haven't read it
> before, my highest recommendations - thank you Nick Johnson for
> consistently good book recommendations)
>
> Did you sign up for the t
Ive gotten my head bit off on stack-overflow for answering a question
in a way that the reader didn't agree with, but then again, at least
people answer questions there. I've yet to have a question asked in
the GAE-java google group get answered. Most of them are just ignored.
On Feb 7, 3:32 pm,
In regards to fewer, fatter, denormalized objects, this isn't unique
to appengine, it's a NoSQL standard best practice. Doing single
fetches by key aren't all that more expensive than looking something
up in memcache (in terms of time taken).
On Feb 22, 12:58 pm, adamd wrote:
> Thanks for you're
Same here. I use pingdom to monitor my site and it's been down on and off
for the past 24 hours to the tune of around 30 minutes.
I opened an enterprise support ticket but haven't heard anything back.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google App Engi
They have responded. Look at the last comment in the thread before yours.
I'm not trying to defend them by any means, I think the lack of response
from google in general is quite disturbing, but Ikai did reply finally
saying that they are working on it.
On Thursday, March 15, 2012 1:59:45 PM UT
Ditto for us. This has worked for months and now it's not working. Opened
an issue with google enterprise support but no response so far.
This is beyond incredible.
On Friday, April 6, 2012 7:19:08 PM UTC-4, Nathaniel Stensland wrote:
>
> Just stopped working for me too. Worked fine before. Yi
+1
On Sunday, May 6, 2012 12:23:48 PM UTC-4, Jeff Schnitzer wrote:
>
> For all the reasons that IDEs were invented. As-you-type compilation,
> refactoring, code completion, integrated debugging... seriously, if
> you're still writing code in a text editor, you are at *best* 1/3 as
> productive
Wise man.
On Friday, May 18, 2012 10:08:27 AM UTC-4, Mathieu Clavel wrote:
>
> Hi Jon,
>
> I also starred your ticket, but as I'm leaving appengine, I'm not going to
> have this problem anymore.
> Others problems on Tomcat, sure, but I will be in control of the
> application server.
>
> Thanks,
can't seem to figure
out why it's happening.
Has anyone found any alternative services that offer the same sort of
solution that might be more reliable?
Thanks,
Rick
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google App Engine" group.
SL proxy servers at
> Amazon/Rackspace/Linode/etc. Just keep an eye on traffic.
>
> Jeff
>
> On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 7:48 AM, Rick Mangi wrote:
> > Hey all,
> >
> > I recently set up cloudflare to get around the issues with appengine not
> > suppor
I meant jmeter tests... not junit.
On Tuesday, May 22, 2012 12:18:29 PM UTC-4, Rick Mangi wrote:
>
> Hey Jeff, how did I know you'd be the first to answer ;-)
>
> I can't think of anything we're doing differently. It's totally bizarre,
> but we see about 5% fai
He means that you can run multiple code bases on the same google app engine
application, they show up as different "versions" but they all share the
same backend services.
So if you app is foo.appspot.com, you can have:
app1.foo.appspot.com
app2.foo.appspot.com
app3.foo.appspot.com
but only th
And they finally fixed the issue we were having with random 500 errors on
PUTs. So +1 on using cloudflare.
On Thursday, June 21, 2012 5:32:27 PM UTC-4, Jeff Schnitzer wrote:
>
> I hate to sound like the cloudflare shill, but why not use them as a
> frontend cache? One of their touted features
$99 per application for SSL and you have to get your own certificate? Oh,
and it's not included in the $500/month we already pay for premium
support... bah.
On Tuesday, June 26, 2012 7:42:16 PM UTC-4, Takashi Matsuo (Google) wrote:
>
>
> Hi App Engine users,
>
> We've just released the release
FWIW I gave up on spring for that same reason. All of the reflection,
scanning and parsing of XML or annotations is just not designed for an
environment like appengine. It's meant for apps that start up once and stay
up for a long time.
On Tuesday, July 10, 2012 8:19:44 AM UTC-4, rerngvit yangg
7 AM UTC-4, Joakim wrote:
>
> Out of interest, which framework(s) are you using to replace Spring?
>
> On Tuesday, July 10, 2012 10:02:17 PM UTC+2, Rick Mangi wrote:
>>
>> FWIW I gave up on spring for that same reason. All of the reflection,
>> scanning and parsing of
Same here! I'm on a thread with enterprise support right now and they are
telling me that the "reverse proxy is to blame". WTF??
You guys have to stop changing things on us with no warning. This is NOT
OK! We are paying customers (at least my company is). You're really giving
us every reason to
lre until google and
> CF work this out. Please help, Google.
>
> On Wednesday, August 1, 2012 5:48:03 PM UTC-4, Rick Mangi wrote:
>>
>> Same here! I'm on a thread with enterprise support right now and they are
>> telling me that the "reverse proxy is to bla
You could start by being a little more transparent about what you're doing.
Publishing release roadmaps are the norm for almost every software company
in the world. You guys seem to love to leave us (the users) in the dark
about everything you do until it's released. This is the 2nd time our sit
trace_token=None, user_output_enabled=None, verbosity='warning', version=None).
2016-09-28 01:23:29,555 DEBUGrootAPI endpoint: [https://appengine.googleapis.com/], API version: [v1beta5]
2016-09-28 01:23:30,527 INFO ___FILE_ONLY___ You are about to deploy the following services:
Nice work! Your site design looks like a a effective way to curate the
mass of GAE links. (Quite charming too.) Our Atlanta Python group is
holding an App Engine Hackathon soon. I'll be sure to point the
attendees to your references.
Wiki or not, I hope you will find a way to accept other people
I noticed this code
http://code.google.com/p/pyib/source/browse/trunk/usercontrol.py
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google App Engine" group.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@
I'm trying to test sending email using Java from GAE SDK 1.3 while in
development mode using the Eclipse Plugin. I'm using Eclipse Build id:
20090920-1017 and Java OpenJDK 1.6. Is this possible, or can I only
send email when my app is actually deployed? I read the docs and I am
aware that it says i
I'm trying to persist a simple class relationship using JDO. My code
is listed below and here's a brief overview of what I'm trying to do:
I have 3 classes:
Person, Customer (extends Person), and Address (referenced from
Person). If I create a Person instance and an Address instance and
call setA
base
class) references an owned object, but gae doesn't seem to like it. I
tried the base class as abstract and concrete, and tried the keys as
type Key and as encoded String. No luck.
Thanks very much for any help.
Rick
On Nov 15, 11:40 pm, Rick Horowitz wrote:
> I'm trying to per
e SDK
with the jars from appengine-orm-1.0.4.rc1.zip?
Thanks very much.
Rick
On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 5:03 PM, Ikai L (Google) wrote:
> The current version won't support inheritance, which may explain why this
> isn't working. It looks like fixes for inheritance will be going o
which I guess doesn't work just yet. I'll report
back. Thanks.
On Nov 19, 8:22 pm, Rick Horowitz wrote:
> Thank you for responding. This is not good, but I guess it could be worse.
> Google could be ignoring these problems instead of fixing them. One more
> question. What
r example, a 3
level inheritance hierarchy, so I can't vouch for that. If I have to
use this type of inheritance in my app, I will post another message to
let people know how it turned out.
In the mean time, I'm hoping that we'll see an update to fix this
owned relationship by a sup
I discovered I cannot query (filter on) a superclass field. I described this
problem as a comment on App Engine Issue 25 -
http://code.google.com/p/datanucleus-appengine/issues/detail?id=25#c24
Anyone that knows what is going on, please reply.
Thanks very much for any help,
Rick
On Fri, Nov 20
Try these instructions for an independent Python install
http://wiki.python.org/moin/MacPython/Leopard
On Nov 19, 2:51 am, thebrianschott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> GoogleAppEngineLauncher cannot find python 2.6 even though it is in /
> usr/local/bin/
>
> I am using a PPC Mac with OS X v10.4.
s the key for the Administrator instance
using KeyFactory.createKey(). Is there some other way to do this?
Thank you,
Rick
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google App Engine" group.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googl
I do the same thing with "parentKeys", all of the String
values get stored correctly, whether they are added to "parentKeys" before
or after calling pm.makePersistent().
This looks like a bug to me. Is this, somehow, normal behavior, or am I
doing something wrong?
Thanks
: true
BROADCAST_DRIVER: log
CACHE_DRIVER: memcached
SESSION_DRIVER: memcached
QUEUE_DRIVER: gae
I still get the error:
The bootstrap/cache directory must be present and writable.
What do I need to change to get my application working?
Thanks,
Rick
--
You received this message because you are
47 matches
Mail list logo
