[google-appengine] Re: how to do text search in GAE?

2008-12-04 Thread tigrillo
Hello: maybe it can help: http://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/issues/detail?id=217 I use this as a temporary option while Search become better On 1 dic, 21:18, kang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > anyone have experience in SearchableModel? > > > > On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 3:10 PM, kang <[EMAIL

[google-appengine] Re: create an image-processing website with GAE?

2008-11-27 Thread tigrillo
mm, looking at the code in http://www.photofunia.com/, we see that the picture is send via POST, so; the client do not process the picture, some server process it. On 27 nov, 15:38, tigrillo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello, I agree GAE is usefull to store and search a big number o

[google-appengine] Re: create an image-processing website with GAE?

2008-11-27 Thread tigrillo
Hello, I agree GAE is usefull to store and search a big number of light entities (ids of pictures)... but dont use GAE to process pictures, it will die; the advice is to use java (as applets) or javascript to process information in the client (not server), (as facebook use an applet to resize pict

[google-appengine] Re: __searchable_text_index gets added multiple times

2008-11-27 Thread tigrillo
It also happen when ordering by some other attribute; it will be posible to avoid the need of that indexes in next versions of GAE? On 19 nov, 14:10, Marzia Niccolai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > This is expected behavior.  When adding the filter, a composite index is > created for the que

[google-appengine] ReferenceProperty could avoid unnecesary resolve

2008-11-13 Thread tigrillo
For the sake of efficient, it will be nice if ReferenceProperty let's us return the Key optionally instead of the Entity. Thanks --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine" group. To post to t

[google-appengine] profiling vs. dashboard

2008-11-06 Thread tigrillo
Hello; I am optimizing my app, I would like to know how to compare "Avg CPU" (dashboard) against "CPU seconds". Megacicles can be compared against seconds? Thank's --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "G

[google-appengine] Re: inconsistent indexes

2008-10-10 Thread tigrillo
if needed, the methods invoqued inside pendiente_aleatoria, but I think it is not the matter. @classmethod def inc(cls): if cls.INT < cls.MAX: cls.INT+=1 @classmethod def dec(cls): if cls.INT > cls.MIN: cls.INT-=1 Thanks --~--~-~--

[google-appengine] Re: inconsistent indexes

2008-10-10 Thread tigrillo
if needed, the methods invoqued inside pendiente_aleatoria, but I think it is not the matter. @classmethod def inc(cls): if cls.INT < cls.MAX: cls.INT+=1 @classmethod def dec(cls): if cls.INT > cls.MIN: cls.INT-=1 Thanks --~--~-~--

[google-appengine] Re: inconsistent indexes

2008-10-10 Thread tigrillo
This was the code when a realized about the problem: I invoque: self.pendiente_aleatoria(False)... and got "1" def pendiente_aleatoria(self, aleatoria=True): ahora = DateSuport.hoy() if aleatoria: offset=int(random.random()*self.INT) else: offset=0

[google-appengine] inconsistent indexes

2008-10-09 Thread tigrillo
Hello; There's an unexpected indexes behavior; I noticed it doing as follow: now = datetime.datetime.now() entity1 = Task.gql("WHERE date_f <= :1 ORDER BY date_f ASC", now).get() if entity1 != None: entity2 = Task.gql("WHERE date_f = :1", entity1.date_f).fetch(limit=1, offset=0) a

[google-appengine] Re: Deleting index stuck

2008-09-12 Thread tigrillo
Hello, I share the trouble (can not delete an index with "building" status nor update_indexes), notify me also, Thanks --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine" group. To post to this group,

[google-appengine] Frozen Indexes (Error Code: 40) and (server error 500)

2008-09-12 Thread tigrillo
App: tigrillotigrillotigrillo 1. I reached the limit of 100 indexes. 2. I tried to fix it using vacuum_indexes, I can erase some indexes... but 3. Some indexes were not deleted; maybe because it's status is "building"... and 4. There is no way to update_indexes because it raises 500 error code.