Re: [google-appengine] Re: Caching certain pages for long periods

2013-07-01 Thread Barry Hunter
On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 7:02 PM, Phil McDonnell phil.a.mcdonn...@gmail.comwrote: In implementing PageSpeed I saw my overall reads go way up (~double), which from a cost perspective is counter productive for me. Graph attached. Does it make sense that we're seeing less caching with PageSpeed

Re: [google-appengine] Re: Caching certain pages for long periods

2013-07-01 Thread Rafael
they don't support the Vary header. :) On Sun, Jun 30, 2013 at 3:18 PM, Barry Hunter barrybhun...@gmail.comwrote: On Sun, Jun 30, 2013 at 9:08 PM, Rafael mufumb...@gmail.com wrote: This is a very common problem for me. I was super used to varnish on normal servers. With appengine it's

[google-appengine] Re: Caching certain pages for long periods

2013-06-30 Thread timh
You can always use the datastore as another level of cache. Process the sitemap, store its rendered output as a record in the datastore, and in memcache. If memcache fails do get() to fetch the rendered output from the datastore, which will still be heaps faster than re-building it. It also

Re: [google-appengine] Re: Caching certain pages for long periods

2013-06-30 Thread Rafael
This is a very common problem for me. I was super used to varnish on normal servers. With appengine it's very hard because the page will never be as fast as varnish if you use memcache. I tried emulating a reverse proxy with cloudfront, but they don't cache HTML. The problem here is very simple:

Re: [google-appengine] Re: Caching certain pages for long periods

2013-06-30 Thread Barry Hunter
On Sun, Jun 30, 2013 at 9:08 PM, Rafael mufumb...@gmail.com wrote: This is a very common problem for me. I was super used to varnish on normal servers. With appengine it's very hard because the page will never be as fast as varnish if you use memcache. I tried emulating a reverse proxy with