Does Google not like the art of hacktivism?
On Mar 15, 8:23 pm, xml2jsonp wrote:
> Ok, then Why this response:
>
> "ok, we understand it's art, but you have to stop it
> now".http://www.we-make-money-not-art.com/archives/2008/01/how-did-neural.php
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> .
> On Mar 15, 8:17 pm, A
Ok, then Why this response:
"ok, we understand it's art, but you have to stop it now".
http://www.we-make-money-not-art.com/archives/2008/01/how-did-neural.php
.
.
.
.
.
.
On Mar 15, 8:17 pm, Andy Freeman wrote:
> (1) Google won't pay for fraudulent clicks that it detects.
> (2) Google's market
(1) Google won't pay for fraudulent clicks that it detects.
(2) Google's market cap is a lot larger than the relevant revenue
stream.
(3) Buying significant numbers of shares drives the share price up,
making (2) a bigger issue.
(4) Once you accumulate a certain % of shares, you have to file
repor
