[google-appengine] Re: Limit on image size very low

2009-12-08 Thread sserrano
In the mean time you can try http://code.google.com/p/appengine-storages/ Is a project Im developing and provides an Storage property that tries to works like the django one. Now has two backends, S3 and datastore. The datastore backend saves the file in 1mb chunks. The code is still beta but

Re: [google-appengine] Re: Limit on image size very low

2009-12-07 Thread Ikai L (Google)
Denis, The roadmap is meant to be a six month launch schedule. We don't work on projects in a serial process, more than likely work has more already begun if not already nearing completion for many of the items on the list. I can't give you a precise date for serving or storing large files yet,

[google-appengine] Re: Limit on image size very low

2009-12-04 Thread Denis
Ikai, Could you please specify a planned date (at least with month precision) of so wanted feature release? Also would it only alter a datastore structure size, or also be applied to incoming/outgoing emails limits, responses limits, POST request size? Thanks in andvance On Nov 19, 1:13 am, Ikai

[google-appengine] Re: Limit on image size very low

2009-11-18 Thread Bjoern
If you have a suggestion, I wouldn't mind trying it. I suspect few python imaging libraries would be pure python, though. On Nov 17, 3:08 pm, Eli Jones eli.jo...@gmail.com wrote: Isn't there another image library you could use to resize? -- You received this message because you are subscribed

[google-appengine] Re: Limit on image size very low

2009-11-18 Thread Cynthia Kurtz
Another issue is, the 1MB limit is incompatible with audio and video as well as just images. So it's not just an imaging library that is needed, it's everything. I had planned to have people be able to collect stories in audio format (say from old folks) and upload them to my site (Rakontu) but

[google-appengine] Re: Limit on image size very low

2009-11-18 Thread Cynthia Kurtz
Sorry - to clarify - I wasn't talking about the imaging service, I was talking about the database limit. I had originally intended to have attachments to stories, which could include say PDF as well as audio and video and images. If there is a way to break up ANY binary data into 1MB chunks and

Re: [google-appengine] Re: Limit on image size very low

2009-11-18 Thread Ikai L (Google)
Cynthia, I have good news for you: From here: http://code.google.com/appengine/docs/roadmap.html - Service for storing and serving large files It's coming! We hear you. On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 3:01 PM, Cynthia Kurtz cfku...@cfkurtz.com wrote: Sorry - to clarify - I wasn't talking about

[google-appengine] Re: Limit on image size very low

2009-11-17 Thread Bjoern
Sure, my only application of the imaging API is to reduce the size of images that users upload, to display the small size on the web. It wouldn't happen very often, either (resize once, display n times). My only idea now is to maybe go through some other service that has an API - a photosharing

[google-appengine] Re: Limit on image size very low

2009-11-17 Thread Westmark
I totally agree. The 1MB size limit for database entities could remain for all I care. Just give me the chance to resize my users' 5MB images to ~300k versions. Besides, the 10MB request size limit seems out of place when seen beside the image api size limit. On Nov 16, 9:32 pm, Bjoern

Re: [google-appengine] Re: Limit on image size very low

2009-11-17 Thread Barry Hunter
Has everyone here actully stared the issue tracker request? http://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/issues/detail?id=1422 thats far more likly to be taken notice of. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group,

[google-appengine] Re: Limit on image size very low

2009-11-17 Thread Jonathan
Or not. On Nov 18, 6:11 am, Barry Hunter barrybhun...@googlemail.com wrote: Has everyone here actully stared the issue tracker request? http://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/issues/detail?id=1422 thats far more likly to be taken notice of. -- You received this message because you are