It's easy to do that, I agree... indeed that's what I am doing. But it
seems NONSENSE (see Wooble reply above ;) and an unnecessary hassle if
we only knew an approx date for paid accounts (and binaryproperty size
limits, etc).
On Sep 18, 9:21 am, cb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It's pretty easy t
Didn't ask for trade secrets... just wanted to know if I can use GAE
for a serious app or just my family blog.
As far as GAE team feedback on this blog, I am not the only one
complaining!
On Sep 18, 5:48 am, Wooble <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Nonsense. At least 2 of the developers are very act
It's pretty easy to send your uploads/downloads to amazon s3 while
you're waiting for google to catch up. That way you can use appengine
to build the framework and amazon can hold the data until appengine is
ready to go with unlimited/pay per use storage.
On Sep 17, 9:44 am, FreeAgent <[EMAIL PR
Nonsense. At least 2 of the developers are very active in this group
in helping people resolve specific problems with their code. The fact
that they're ignoring your demands to reveal their trade secrets
doesn't mean they're not reading them.
On Sep 18, 1:32 am, Dado <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
+1... I actually would be happy with even a NOT firm date... but don't
hold your breath! It doesn't look like may GAE team people are really
paying attention to this group.
On Sep 17, 6:44 am, FreeAgent <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello to the GAE team!
>
> I've been a fan of App Engine since la
