Hi Khai,
On 13 Mai, 07:53, Khai khaitd...@gmail.com wrote:
I've tried to read the articles on using django with appengine, but I
am confused. Should I go with App Engine Helper for Django or
should I go with app-engine-patch?
Use app-engine-patch. It is much more complete and feature-rich
thanks for the advice all.
On Jan 4, 12:30 pm, Bobby bobbysoa...@gmail.com wrote:
I was also undecided on whether to go with Django on top of the GAE
but ended up going for it using the AppEngine Patch and i'm glad i
did.
Yesterday i needed to setup feeds and Django took care of everything
Hi Ray,
On Jan 2, 6:42 pm, Ray Malone rayish...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm not sure of the benefits of using the Patch. I have been able to
build two good sized apps (1000+ lines of code each) using the App
Engine defaults. I know my code is not best practice yet, so I'm
looking to learn more
I was also undecided on whether to go with Django on top of the GAE
but ended up going for it using the AppEngine Patch and i'm glad i
did.
Yesterday i needed to setup feeds and Django took care of everything
in literally a couple of lines - it just keeps on giving.
Also, the beauty of
On Jan 3, 6:43 pm, gops patelgo...@gmail.com wrote:
think this way :: if there was a need of app engine patch than google
would have released it.
Actually, Google did release django-helper, but we (app-engine-patch)
disagreed about unnecessarily introducing a new model class for Django
users.
dont use it if you are in learning phase , or not in hurry.
think this way :: if there was a need of app engine patch than google
would have released it.
and i personally think , webapp is sufficient for pretty large
project , afterall no matter how much django do for you , atlast for
if you need features of django 0.96 then it makes sense to use this
patch (or writing your own ...)
if not, I agree with gops
regards
On Jan 3, 2:43 pm, gops patelgo...@gmail.com wrote:
dont use it if you are in learning phase , or not in hurry.
think this way :: if there was a need of app
