Hi,
Thank you for stepping in. What I've found myself wasting a lot of time with
is quite inefficient navigation in GAE Status panel. Investigating current
performance graphs I find myself repeatedly visiting 27th of Feb graphs and
actual graphs and comparing scales.
Can you invest a bit more
Raw data is good - I didn't realise you could click through to the
performance graphs on the status page. But currently it only shows the
past performance, and leaves us guessing about the future.
During the recent issue, I posted a complaint about lack of feedback,
and Pete Koomen's response
Interesting. Our app has paying customers, so this week's latencies
have been pretty stressful - but I don't agree with you.
We have dedicated servers for our old apps, and use Appengine for new
ones. When old customers call asking about problems, the world is on
my shoulders - I have total
It's an interesting issue...I think we're all happy for things to
behave pretty much like a black box when stuff is working as it's
meant to, but are we so happy with that when things aren't working?
Personally I don't need to know who specifically is responsible for
the machines my apps run on,
This is a very interesting thread. And yes, indeed, cluster stability
and uptime and transparency are all of the utmost importance to us
here on the App Engine team.
I also agree that a fundamental increase in transparency would serve
everyone's interests.
As far as I can tell, transparency
Jon,
I think we'd all agree that an automatically published report is
better than a), or b). However, because there's Secret Sauce running
behind App Engine, surely a myriad of infrastructure details that
you'll never be allowed to publish detailed data on, c) will also
probably never be enough.
Jon,
I agree and would add that publishing raw data would also require some
educational resource for those of us who are not network or system engineers
Steve
-Original Message-
From: google-appengine@googlegroups.com
[ mailto:google-appengine@googlegroups.com
