Would a simple cron task not work to keep an app instance warm?
On Oct 14, 3:55 pm, ryan baldwin ryanbald...@gmail.com wrote:
+1 here.
- ryan.
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 8:52 AM, Gijsbert gijsbert.de.h...@gmail.comwrote:
I'm also interested.
On Oct 13, 10:24 am, bFlood
doesn't seem to in my tests, anyone have any luck with it?
the big downside is all of those requests (CPU/bandwidth) just to keep
it running, an always warm instance would only burn memory (although I
can see Google having to charge a decent amount, otherwise everyone
would just keep one
I'm also interested.
On Oct 13, 10:24 am, bFlood bflood...@gmail.com wrote:
bump...
On Oct 12, 12:25 pm, twink* john.tur...@gmail.com wrote:
Add my name to the list of people that would consider paying to always
keep at least one instance warm.
On Oct 12, 8:43 am, bFlood
+1 here.
- ryan.
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 8:52 AM, Gijsbert gijsbert.de.h...@gmail.comwrote:
I'm also interested.
On Oct 13, 10:24 am, bFlood bflood...@gmail.com wrote:
bump...
On Oct 12, 12:25 pm, twink* john.tur...@gmail.com wrote:
Add my name to the list of people that would
bump...
On Oct 12, 12:25 pm, twink* john.tur...@gmail.com wrote:
Add my name to the list of people that would consider paying to always
keep at least one instance warm.
On Oct 12, 8:43 am, bFlood bflood...@gmail.com wrote:
hello
I noticed in the Oct 7 chat that Google is
Add my name to the list of people that would consider paying to always
keep at least one instance warm.
On Oct 12, 8:43 am, bFlood bflood...@gmail.com wrote:
hello
I noticed in the Oct 7 chat that Google is considering(?) allowing
developers paid-for warm instances of your app.
If you're
