https://lh5.googleusercontent.com/-mYRU7MvjRQI/TndWaN3NpHI/A9o/1c3ZDl91hkw/estimates.png
Thanks for sharing the info about your apps. I think it could be better for
apps that are medium-sized. If your app is commercial you can't expect to
host it for free anyhow. And I agree that you
That's an interesting point. If you could optimize your resource usage to
$2.10, that would be the cheapskate sweet spot :)
On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 6:50 AM, Gopal Patel patelgo...@gmail.com wrote:
I think $2.10 also count towards resource usage if I am not mistaken. so
gae is cheapest for app
To: google-appengine@googlegroups.com
Subject: [google-appengine] Re: New Pricing ROCKS! for Small apps
You're forgetting the $2.10 per week (~$9/month) minimum charge, which is
actually annoying for small apps that only bill for a fraction of that, like
mine where I am projecting spending about
, September 18, 2011 10:21 AM
To: google-appengine@googlegroups.com
Subject: [google-appengine] Re: New Pricing ROCKS! for Small apps
lets also keep in mind that your app will be slower and have more latency
than before.
You had enabled 3 instances always on. If you aim for that under the new
I had significant pricing changes on my apps.
I have 3 apps
appid1 ~1500 rec/sec dropped from ~$170 to ~$75 (per day)
appid2 ~150 rec/sec dropped from ~$11 to $7 (per day)
appid3 ~4 rec/sec increases from $0 to ~$0.13 (per day)
All data store reads operation are made using key_names.
I use
Yeah I've got a bunch of apps I use for stuff like testing, or
verifying things before posting responses on the groups, etc..., that
I need to evaluate now. Several have tiny little charges showing up
some days which will translate to $9/month. Kind of a bummer.
On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at
I think $2.10 also count towards resource usage if I am not mistaken. so gae
is cheapest for app that is costing $2.10 to run.
On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 10:43 AM, Gerald Tan woefulwab...@gmail.com wrote:
You're forgetting the $2.10 per week (~$9/month) minimum charge, which is
actually annoying
