RE: [google-appengine] Re: URLFetch Quota Is Stupid

2012-08-30 Thread Drake
Will do. Can you take the quota off of me in the mean time J From: google-appengine@googlegroups.com [mailto:google-appengine@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Peter McKenzie Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2012 4:50 PM To: google-appengine@googlegroups.com Subject: [google-appengine] Re: URLFetch

Re: [google-appengine] Re: URLFetch Quota Is Stupid

2012-08-30 Thread Takashi Matsuo
Hi Brandon, Can we discuss this off-list? Please tell me your desired QPS, a purpose of your application, and your usage pattern of the service, etc. -- Takashi -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine" group. To post to this group, send e

RE: [google-appengine] Re: URLFetch Quota Is Stupid

2012-08-31 Thread Drake
. Off list message to follow. From: google-appengine@googlegroups.com [mailto:google-appengine@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Takashi Matsuo Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2012 9:58 PM To: google-appengine@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [google-appengine] Re: URLFetch Quota Is Stupid Hi

Re: [google-appengine] Re: URLFetch Quota Is Stupid

2012-08-31 Thread Takashi Matsuo
i Matsuo > *Sent:* Thursday, August 30, 2012 9:58 PM > *To:* google-appengine@googlegroups.com > *Subject:* Re: [google-appengine] Re: URLFetch Quota Is Stupid > > ** ** > > ** ** > > Hi Brandon, > > ** ** > > Can we discuss this off-list? Pleas

RE: [google-appengine] Re: URLFetch Quota Is Stupid

2012-08-31 Thread Drake
Takashi Matsuo Sent: Friday, August 31, 2012 12:33 AM To: google-appengine@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [google-appengine] Re: URLFetch Quota Is Stupid On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 4:13 PM, Drake wrote: Sure. But I have filed a billing support request via the Quota increase form every other d

Re: [google-appengine] Re: URLFetch Quota Is Stupid

2012-08-31 Thread Richard Watson
oard, and can’t find a documented number for. > > > > > > > *From:* google-a...@googlegroups.com [mailto: > google-a...@googlegroups.com ] *On Behalf Of *Takashi Matsuo > *Sent:* Friday, August 31, 2012 12:33 AM > *To:* google-a...@googlegroups.com > *Subject:* Re: [google-

RE: [google-appengine] Re: URLFetch Quota Is Stupid

2012-08-31 Thread Drake
> I wish I could pay e.g. $100 for a support query, though. $6000 per year insurance just seems a bit high, unless you're already pretty profitable. $6k is worth it if you got Architecture support. But it is really more billing support. The biggest reason to pay the $500 is to be able to u

Re: [google-appengine] Re: URLFetch Quota Is Stupid

2012-08-31 Thread Jason Collins
[It seems this thread has gone sideways - again.] I would really, really love to see no urlfetch quota limitations between apps. Perhaps though you would need to enable this to prevent App Engine apps from maliciously hammering each other? If so, this technique seems fine to me: remoteapi_CUST

RE: [google-appengine] Re: URLFetch Quota Is Stupid

2012-08-31 Thread Drake
om: google-appengine@googlegroups.com [mailto:google-appengine@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Jason Collins Sent: Friday, August 31, 2012 9:41 AM To: google-appengine@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [google-appengine] Re: URLFetch Quota Is Stupid [It seems this thread has gone sideways - again.]

RE: [google-appengine] Re: URLFetch Quota Is Stupid

2012-08-31 Thread Drake
: [google-appengine] Re: URLFetch Quota Is Stupid Thanks for creating the feature request. We had a meet up yesterday, and So I haven't had time to do so. I might even be ok with Between App limits, but Between Front End and Backend is really stupid. I can't imagine a scenario wher