Hi,
You can't fork threads from within gae and letting an active servlet
sleep within gae to reschedule it every 30 min is not a good idea for
various reasons (resources, risk of failure, etc..
you have to either go the cron or the task way (and with a delay time
of 30 min). Cron way is the
Hi,
It might be solved by this thought is not a direct answer.
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java/browse_thread/thread/3647a2d262386b41
please try thanks.
2011/1/16 A. Stevko andy.ste...@gmail.com:
Why not just back it up or check-in to version control?
Another option is to
Hi there,
So I downloaded SDK v1.4 and put the folder into eclipse plugins
com.google.appengine.eclipse.sdkbundle.1.3.5_1.3.5.v201006301254.
Then I went into my Eclipse menu preferences Google/App Engine and
added the 1.4 SDK directory. Then I checked use SDK 1.4 instead of
1.3.5.
Is that
Hi,
More is needed: you have to change the old gae jars in the /lib of
your war directory by the equivalent new ones that you find in the
directories of the plugin.
Then, you have to fix the buildpath of your project to adapt to the
jars that changed names because of new versions, etc.
Then,
Thanks to speedplane for the suggestion.
To answer my own question, the algorithm I suggested did indeed work,
returning a cursor.
Cheers,
Glenn
On Dec 21 2010, 10:59 pm, Glenn glenn.mur...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm trying to find a workaround for some query cursor limitations.
Say that I have
hmmm thnx. it certainly did the trick.but I couldn't find the maximum
length of a key? any ideas ?
On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 6:42 PM, Didier Durand durand.did...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
You may be interested to read to undertstand the structure of DS keys:
Yeah, I've been looking at extending the netbeans build files. That
would probably work. But the link m seleron suggested looks promising
-- it could be the cleanest way to do that IMO.
Will try it and let you guys know.
Dan
On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 08:11, andrew aute...@gmail.com wrote:
I added
Hi,
I don't know the exact answer to your question but what I can say is
that it is clearly dependent on your entity group hierarchy.
The key contains a concatenation of the key of all the ancestors.
I never saw any limitation on the depth of this ancestor hierarchy.
So, if you can be as deep
