correctly in the GAE development server.
I'll send you the code ASAP.
Thanks
Marton Papp wrote:Hi Patrizio, I am not sure what you mean by having the
error only in JUnit tests. The same code runs correctly in some other
environment? Anyway, the documentation says that it is not allowed
still
surprise me. Is that documented somewhere? Need to go back and
reread that stuff I guess.
I'll see if I can come up with a simple test case for the collection.
On Sep 22, 3:28 am, Marton Papp mapr...@gmail.com wrote:
A class cannot have two different owned relationship
Hi Patrizio,
I am not sure what you mean by having the error only in JUnit tests.
The same code runs correctly in some other environment?
Anyway, the documentation says that it is not allowed to update the
same entity more than once in a single transaction. However I was not
able to reproduce
Hi Patrizio,
I removed the _embedded=true_ attribute from the mapping of the
stat field and now it seems to be better. At least I can retrieve
the object with the correct values. I have not checked the code in
detail, but I guess if you are embedding Stat then you do not need a
primary key for
Hi,
I think that the performance of ListPicture can actually be better
then using ListKey. Of course you should not try to retrieve the
pictures by using user.getPictures() if there are many, because it
will try to load all of them. But the difference is how it is stored
in the database. I think
Hi Andreas,
The field mapped with the gae.parent-pk is expected to hold a Key
value or a key value encoded as string. Try this:
public ShoppingList(Shopper shopper) {
Key shopperKey =
KeyFactory.createKey(Shopper.class.getSimpleName(),
shopper.getEmail());
scenario: the same owned
type but not the same owned instance.
My original question is not about one particular entity having two
parents (in an owned relationship), but having two entity groups share
the same owned Java type.
Does that make sense?
On Sep 21, 2:00 pm, Marton Papp mapr
Hi Corneliu!
I also had doubts about using JDO in GAE when I started to work with
it. Especially because I met several bugs and it was annoying and time
wasting to figure out what was going wrong. But then the bugs were
fixed in the next release, so I think the guys are generally doing a
good
Hi,
The code in that form also works for me, but just because the
exception is caught and never reported. If you rethrow any exceptions
from the catch blocks than you should get something like the
following:
Detected attempt to establish Parent2(3) as the parent of Parent1(1)/
Child1(2) but the
Hi,
Those two are equivalent Java constructs, and it should not be the
solution to your problem. Have you tried rewriting your code to the
original (having the return statement within the try block) and run it
again? Are you sure you have not changed anything else?
Marton
On Sep 21, 6:29 pm,
Hi Max,
I am surprised that this actually works. :)
I could not find the documentation describing this feature. Do you
know how is this implemented? Is it more efficient than just calling
getObjectByIdentity N (=listOfKeys.size()) times?
Thanks,
Marton
On Sep 8, 9:14 pm, Max Ross
Hi!
I am using HttpSession to store some information as session
attributes. When I am testing the application locally, it works fine.
But when I upload it to production, it seems that any session
attributes that I retrieve from the session and modify it are not
persisted back to the session
12 matches
Mail list logo
