The clue is "libstdc++.so.5: cannot open shared object file: No such file or
directory"
Try googling this along with "apt-get".
9.10 switched from stdc5 to stdc6, so you need to install the legacy stdc5
package. It's a common "problem" with 9.10 and nothing to do with Eclipse or
GAE
On Mon, No
I think you'll get better answers in the GWT group
http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en
On Sat, Nov 7, 2009 at 7:25 PM, Vik wrote:
> Hie
>
> I am a newbie in GWT and so very much confused for what to use for
> desigining my ui. I mean should i use the widgets comes with GWT
symbolic link?
It might be worth raising an issue, requesting that the temp files be pushed
down one level. Thus /tmp/appengine/stuff, instead of the current
/tmp/stuff.
That would make it easier for you to relocate using a symlink, and also help
me tidy up my /tmp directory :-)
On Fri, Nov 6,
code that is prepared to handle the new SDK, and by
> that time, if we've goofed and introduced an incompatibility, your app has
> already run into it. I suppose we could make the SDK available ahead of
> time in some form where it can only be run locally, but I can imagine it
> b
Horses for courses.
Do you know Javascript?
Does GWT-RPC work for you, or do you prefer REST, DWR or your home-grown c-s
protocol?
Will you be using other APIs such as Gdata?
Do you require any particular widgets from either GWT or Jquery?
...the list goes on
GAE is agnostic. The biggest issue y
se date? Maybe there's some other
> way I can help you with them.
>
> Max
>
> On Thu, Nov 5, 2009 at 6:09 PM, Roy Smith wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Nov 5, 2009 at 9:17 PM, Max Ross (Google) <
>> maxr+appeng...@google.com > wrote:
>>
>>> The next SDK (1
On Thu, Nov 5, 2009 at 9:17 PM, Max Ross (Google)
> wrote:
> The next SDK (1.2.8) is working its way through QA right now so hopefully
> it will be available in the next week or two.
>
>
Please can we get a bit more notice on the changes and the make-live date
than we did with 1.2.6
--~--~--
Hi Max
Thx for the answer, especially the correction on the transaction
implementation.
The solution I'd arrived at is to use Guice to instantiate my DsS with a
scope of @RequestScoped. Do you see any problems with that approach?
best
Roy
On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 7:02 PM, Max Ross (Google)
> wr
Hi Vince
Thanks for sharing.
I've modified my persistence framework to incorporate your class and it
works very well.
kind regards
Roy
On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 8:15 PM, Vince Bonfanti wrote:
>
> P.S. Because of issue 2097
> (http://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/issues/detail?id=2097), the
>
Resistance is futile :-)
It only enforces referential integrity in that you specify the parent at
entity creation time. LLAPI does NOT prevent you subsequently deleting a
parent and thus orphaning the child.
The main benefit is that the 2 entities formed as a parent/child in this way
form an enti
I think this is more likely to be a gadget issue than an appengine issue.
Check the gadgets discussion group as a few other people are experiencing
the same issue
On Sat, Oct 24, 2009 at 3:24 PM, Brian Dorry wrote:
>
> I have recently been tasked with working on creating a gadget for a
> projec
Have a look at Apache Click
On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 1:01 PM, Tor wrote:
>
> I'm very pleased with the Google Web Toolkit (GWT) and it would very
> nice to adopt the same way of building html code user interfaces in
> servlets in GAE - as an alternative to the servlet dispatching jsp
> paradigm.
> For example I'd like my users to enter their u...@mycompany.com email
> rather than someb...@gmail.com. Is this possible?
I have a GAE app defined as public which I can authenticate to using
u...@mycompany.com. The rules for when this does and doesn't work seem ill
defined.
> then you need to
>
I think the answer is no, and the irony isn't lost.
I haven't looked into it, but depending on the length of your strings, you
might be able to store multiple substrings and build a query which applies
"like %" across all the substrings. There was an article somewhere (or was
it a Google IO talk) w
My goal wasn't to economise on api _ms so I haven't done any comparisons.
afaik, commit is done at an entity level, so I don't monitor individual
fields for changes. If I'm wrong then it wouldn't be too difficult to
build dirty flags into my DTO setters.
My advice to anybody building apps for GAE
I did more or less the same thing for the same reasons, and with the same
happy result.The only difference for me was instead of annotations, I
generate my model from an RDBMS. This way I know I can port my app to an
RDBMS world should GAE ever go the same way as Google Notebook.
On Thu, Oct 22,
Answered in this thread
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java/browse_thread/thread/958851cc674d0c70/7403586fae9ffe20?lnk=gst&q=startswith#7403586fae9ffe20
On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 6:34 PM, George Moschovitis <
george.moschovi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> what is the suggested wa
It's a standard Java Mail task, nothing to do with GAE. Try googling "java
mail multipart examples"
On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 3:03 AM, Prashant wrote:
> how do i separate both type msg bodies ?
>
>
> >
>
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you a
>
> > is this right way to read message body? why i am getting same body twice
> in two different forms (plain text & html)?
because that's what your email client is sending. It's quite normal.
>
>
> >
>
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you
I realise that "non-deterministic" is a relative term, and that given enough
time, reading, research, etc etc I will be able to determine why adding a
println prevents an NPE.
My point (and I think of others) is "why?". Especially since it's taken me 2
days already that I was supposed to have spent
20 matches
Mail list logo
