> Just took a look at DataNucleus documentation - Timestamp cannot be
> used as a type of a field -
You mean "java.sql.Timestamp" that is clearly marked as persistable by
DataNucleus docs (though not by default - so you have to add
@Temporal, or @Basic annotation on the field) ?
--
You received
Just took a look at DataNucleus documentation - Timestamp cannot be
used as a type of a field -
http://www.datanucleus.org/products/accessplatform_1_1/jpa/types.html
On Nov 13, 4:47 pm, m seleron wrote:
> Hi
> If it is unquestionable even if the Nano second is lost
> I think that I can do normal
Hi
If it is unquestionable even if the Nano second is lost
I think that I can do normal registration by using "java.util.Date".
thanks.
On 11月13日, 午後7:13, Zaske wrote:
> Hi all,
> I have a problem with using JPA & Google App engine
>
> Here is my entity:
>
> @Entity
> public class UserEntity
