The solution was to change the projects JRE to the JDK's jre. This also
helped me deploy my project to Google App using Eclipse.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google App Engine for Java" group.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengin
@IKai what was your fix for this guestbook.jsp error? I get a red x over
the file name itself, but don't see a red square to indicate what the error
is. I'm able to run it locally, but when I try to upload it following the
last steps in the tutorial Eclipse throws an error:
Unable to update:
I do not get an x next to the jsp. Instead I am getting a dreamweaver icon.
No colour coding on the text and no matter what i change on this file, the
result i am getting on my browser are the same. web.xml has been update and
has this file as welcome, but the application stillpoints to the orig
I'm getting exactly the same thing. How did you create you jsp file? I
could not find a specific jsp file
on the File/New so I created a generic file and named it
guestbook.jsp. This may be the problem, but I
could not find a way around it.
On Mar 2, 5:43 pm, "marsh...@marshallfarrier.com"
wrote:
another thing that might be helpful for diagnostics of my
guestbook.jsp following the java tutorial: Eclipse isn't color coding
anything or making use of its programmer-friendly features on the .jsp
file, which i have in the war directory of the project. Eclipse is of
course using a JDK for the pro
actually, i did just discover some info on what it doesn't like: Down
in the bottom box where there's a console tab and a few others, there
is also a problems tab. When i click there it says "your project must
be configured to use a JDK in order to use JSPs."
Just following the tutorial, i did cha
nothing comes up when i hover, just shows the hand with finger pointed
but no text. usually multiple cleans get rid of that kind of issue but
for some reason not in this case.
On Mar 1, 2:08 pm, "Ikai Lan (Google)" wrote:
> Do you know what the error says when you hover over the X?
>
> Could just
