Re: [appengine-java] Re: Introducing App Engine SDK 1.3.0

2009-12-15 Thread Guillaume Laforge
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 12:34, George Moschovitis wrote: > [...] > - No free quota Even just a small free quota would be really nice, for small apps, prototypes, for experimenting with the feature, etc.! -- Guillaume Laforge Groovy Project Manager Head of Groovy Development at SpringSource htt

Re: [appengine-java] Re: Introducing App Engine SDK 1.3.0

2009-12-15 Thread Prashant
+1, please do that. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine for Java" group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine-j...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googl

Re: [appengine-java] Re: Introducing App Engine SDK 1.3.0

2009-12-15 Thread Nick Johnson (Google)
Hi George, On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 11:34 AM, George Moschovitis < george.moschovi...@gmail.com> wrote: > This is a long awaited feature. > > Some problems though: > > - Instead of the serve() helper I would expect access to the blobs > through a url, something like: > http://my-app.appenginebs.c

Re: [appengine-java] Re: Introducing App Engine SDK 1.3.0

2009-12-15 Thread Nick Johnson (Google)
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 1:55 PM, George Moschovitis < george.moschovi...@gmail.com> wrote: > > is interpreted by the infrastructure to cause it > > to send the blob back to the user. > > What does 'interpreted' mean? is the actual file served from a > separate infrastructure optimized for static f

Re: [appengine-java] Re: Introducing App Engine SDK 1.3.0

2009-12-15 Thread Ikai L (Google)
George, We did some optimizations for dynamic languages running on the JVM, so this isn't surprising. We're not done yet. It'll only get better from this point on. On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 8:49 AM, George Moschovitis < george.moschovi...@gmail.com> wrote: > > The release also includes some perfor