On Mon, Apr 26, 2021 at 6:27 AM Louis Yang wrote:
> Are we allowed to talk about the solution to the contest after the round
> finished?
>
>
Yes, after the round is over, you can talk all you want. You can also see
all the submitted codes by clicking on a person's nickname in the
scoreboard.
Yes I submitted the same code three times for problem C and it worked the
third time!
On Mon, 26 Apr 2021, 00:05 Bartholomew Furrow, wrote:
> Great problems today! I have to admit that my solution to C was to invent
> some heuristics, then keep refining them until they had about a 50% chance
>
HI, there I didn't actually understand your message, but I'll share my code
I hope It'll explain.
def para(list):
ans = ""
for i in range(len(list)):
if i==0:
ans+="("*int(list[i][0])
else:
if int(list[i][0])>int(list[i-1][0]):
One possible reason is that the result does not fit in 32-bit integer and
your maxn and min cause overflow
在2021年4月25日星期日 UTC-7 上午8:26:53 写道：
> Can anyone please tell me what's wrong with this code? It's showing *RE *at
> the *Test Set 2*.
>
> import java.util.Scanner;
> import static
I'm getting the same wrong output in Perl 5.28.1 which is the version Code Jam
uses. I noticed both 5.26.1 and 5.33.7 (the other versions available to me)
gave the correct answer, so I tried to bisect it. The bug was introduced in
Are we allowed to talk about the solution to the contest after the round
finished?
lu...@pebody.org 在 2021年4月25日 星期日上午8:41:45 [UTC-7] 的信中寫道：
> Good luck everybody!
>
> On Sun, Apr 25, 2021 at 4:32 PM 'Chelsea Lieb' via Google Code Jam <
> googl...@googlegroups.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Code
