[gcj] qualification round

2012-04-13 Thread K21G
how many programmer will be selected from this qualification round?? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Code Jam" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-code/-/khY-7P6tWUoJ. To post to this gro

[gcj] Qualification Round

2013-04-14 Thread Amir Hossein Sharifzadeh
Hi, Will Google notify qualified contestants for advancing to the Online First Rounds? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Code Jam" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to google-code+unsubscr..

[gcj] Qualification Round

2016-04-03 Thread Mahady Pial
What should be my minimum rank in the Qualification Round of Code Jam 2016 to go to the next round ? Thanks in Advance :) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Code Jam" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send

Re: [gcj] qualification round

2012-04-13 Thread Ameer Ayoub
You just have to get more than 20 points, there isn't a ranking cutoff -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Code Jam" group. To post to this group, send email to google-code@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-co

Re: [gcj] qualification round

2012-04-13 Thread K21G
oh thanx On Saturday, April 14, 2012 10:22:37 AM UTC+5:45, Ameer Ayoub wrote: > > You just have to get more than 20 points, there isn't a ranking cutoff -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Code Jam" group. To view this discussion on the web

Re: [gcj] qualification round

2012-04-14 Thread Yunus Kiran
ı select 14 Nisan 2012 07:36 tarihinde K21G yazdı: > how many programmer will be selected from this qualification round?? > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Google Code Jam" group. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups

Re: [gcj] qualification round

2012-04-15 Thread Shahan Ayyub
This is the first time i qualified for the next round of google code jam. I am participating from last three years. Alhamdulillah! qualified this time. Regards, Shahan On Sat, Apr 14, 2012 at 3:10 AM, Yunus Kiran wrote: > ı select > > > 14 Nisan 2012 07:36 tarihinde K21G yazdı: > > how many p

Re: [gcj] qualification round

2012-04-15 Thread Luke Pebody
Congrats! On Sun, Apr 15, 2012 at 5:15 PM, Shahan Ayyub wrote: > This is the first time i qualified for the next round of google code jam. I > am participating from last three years. > > Alhamdulillah! qualified this time. > > Regards, > Shahan > > > On Sat, Apr 14, 2012 at 3:10 AM, Yunus Kiran

Re: [gcj] qualification round

2012-04-15 Thread Avinash Jain
Is result has been announced? My score is 60 as per score board, does that mean I've completed qualification round or result is yet to be pronounced. regards, avinash On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 1:10 AM, Luke Pebody wrote: > Congrats! > > On Sun, Apr 15, 2012 at 5:15 PM, Shahan Ayyub > wrote: > >

Re: [gcj] qualification round

2012-04-15 Thread Hussein El-Sayed
The code jam team will send you a congrats mail saying that you are qualified to the next round.. for now as per the scoreboard all contestants who have 20 points or more will be qualified, and should receive this congrats mail soon. Thanks, Hussein On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 7:26 AM, Avinash Jain

Re: [gcj] Qualification Round

2013-04-14 Thread Olaf Doschke
I assume so, because while you mainly only need 35 points to advance, the Codejam team would need to analyze languages used to comply with contest rules and at least verify roughly, if the submitted code would produce the output. They already stated they don't run your code, IIRC. But in the end,

Re: [gcj] Qualification Round

2013-04-14 Thread Radin Ahmed Ehsan
In the mean time below is a post from my blog which contains the solution to Problem A and Problem C small. http://radinehsan.wordpress.com/2013/04/14/solution-to-google-code-jam-problem-a-and-problem-c-small/ On Sun, Apr 14, 2013 at 1:40 PM, Olaf Doschke wrote: > I assume so, because while you

Re: [gcj] Qualification Round

2013-04-14 Thread porker2008
the solution to Problem A is so impressive. =) On Sunday, April 14, 2013 3:58:34 PM UTC+8, CoderBaba wrote: > In the mean time below is a post from my blog which contains the solution to > Problem A and Problem C small. > > http://radinehsan.wordpress.com/2013/04/14/solution-to-google-code-jam-p

Re: [gcj] Qualification Round

2013-04-14 Thread Sunchips
Use loops maybe? >_< On Sunday, April 14, 2013 1:28:34 PM UTC+5:30, CoderBaba wrote: > In the mean time below is a post from my blog which contains the solution to > Problem A and Problem C small. > > http://radinehsan.wordpress.com/2013/04/14/solution-to-google-code-jam-problem-a-and-problem-c-

Re: [gcj] Qualification Round

2013-04-14 Thread Radin Ahmed Ehsan
Last year I ran out of the 8 minutes thus this year I wanted to make sure nothing like that happens thus did not use any loops :( On Sun, Apr 14, 2013 at 4:28 PM, Sunchips wrote: > Use loops maybe? >_< > > On Sunday, April 14, 2013 1:28:34 PM UTC+5:30, CoderBaba wrote: > > In the mean time below

Re: [gcj] Qualification Round

2013-04-14 Thread sumit sharma
Yes they do notify the qualifiers. I did get it last year On Sun, Apr 14, 2013 at 4:36 PM, Radin Ahmed Ehsan < radin.ahmed.eh...@gmail.com> wrote: > Last year I ran out of the 8 minutes thus this year I wanted to make sure > nothing like that happens thus did not use any loops :( > > > On Sun, A

Re: [gcj] Qualification Round

2013-04-14 Thread sumit sharma
Do you have the solution to D problem. My solution was dead slow. On Sun, Apr 14, 2013 at 6:20 PM, sumit sharma wrote: > Yes they do notify the qualifiers. I did get it last year > > > On Sun, Apr 14, 2013 at 4:36 PM, Radin Ahmed Ehsan < > radin.ahmed.eh...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Last year I ra

Re: [gcj] Qualification Round

2013-04-14 Thread Otaku
> Do you have the solution to D problem. My solution was dead slow. Last year, the Google team released a "problem analysis" a few days after the contest. Plus you can download solutions from the "Contest scoreboard". -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups

Re: [gcj] Qualification Round

2013-04-14 Thread Jugesh Sundram
@Radin Ahmed Ehsan: you seem to be a TOTAL noob to logic and programming. You hard-coded everything? Seriously?? No offense. But that is the worst ever solution I came across for Code Jam !! On 14 April 2013 09:03, Otaku wrote: > > Do you have the solution to D problem. My solution was dead slo

Re: [gcj] Qualification Round

2013-04-14 Thread Sunchips
Well, I redacted my comment because I know that it's just a learning process. But its a 4x4 grid, loops are more than fine. You need to code based on the input size and the time you are allotted to solve it in. Given the 8 mins or so you get to submit the solution, O(N^2) solution would probabl

Re: [gcj] Qualification Round

2013-04-14 Thread Aja Huang
You can download everyone's solutions in the scoreboard. Aja 2013/4/14 sumit sharma > Do you have the solution to D problem. My solution was dead slow. > > > On Sun, Apr 14, 2013 at 6:20 PM, sumit sharma wrote: > >> Yes they do notify the qualifiers. I did get it last year >> >> >> On Sun, Ap

Re: [gcj] Qualification Round

2013-04-14 Thread Nitin Shukla
LawnMover was a good question. :) On Sun, Apr 14, 2013 at 6:33 PM, Otaku wrote: > > Do you have the solution to D problem. My solution was dead slow. > > Last year, the Google team released a "problem analysis" a few days after > the contest. Plus you can download solutions from the "Contest sc

Re: [gcj] Qualification Round

2013-04-14 Thread Amol Manoj Bhave
On Sunday, April 14, 2013 4:36:36 PM UTC+5:30, CoderBaba wrote: > Last year I ran out of the 8 minutes thus this year I wanted to make sure > nothing like that happens thus did not use any loops :( > > > > > On Sun, Apr 14, 2013 at 4:28 PM, Sunchips wrote: > > > Use loops maybe? >_< > > >

Re: [gcj] Qualification Round

2013-04-14 Thread Rob Lachlan
That's some typing ability you've got there. Respect. Don't avoid loops. The overhead of a loop is miniscule; it'll never make a difference in codejam. What's more, your compiler can unroll loops if necessary to optimize the target code. Have a look here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Loop_un

Re: [gcj] Qualification Round

2013-04-14 Thread Niraj Kumar
Hi ! now we have 12 days for next round. I need to practice for it Please help/suggest me from where I can practice & learn to perform better in round 1. Few major problem I am facing is . I am taking to much time to complete a code. . I am able to write optimize code in first attempt(mostly I ge

Re: [gcj] Qualification Round

2013-04-14 Thread nitin sharma
The solution is really impressive. Thank God it was 4*4 square :) On Sun, Apr 14, 2013 at 2:47 PM, porker2008 wrote: > the solution to Problem A is so impressive. =) > > On Sunday, April 14, 2013 3:58:34 PM UTC+8, CoderBaba wrote: > > In the mean time below is a post from my blog which contains

Re: [gcj] Qualification Round

2013-04-14 Thread Siew Ling
But too bad at the scoreboard, it didn't say the language used. Best regards, Siew Ling On Apr 14, 2013, at 9:03 PM, Otaku wrote: >> Do you have the solution to D problem. My solution was dead slow. > > Last year, the Google team released a "problem analysis" a few days after the > contest. P

Re: [gcj] Qualification Round

2013-04-14 Thread Andres Felipe Ruiz
There is no point on doing that kind of comments. Just keep it to yourself genius On Sun, Apr 14, 2013 at 9:52 AM, Jugesh Sundram wrote: > @Radin Ahmed Ehsan: you seem to be a TOTAL noob to logic and programming. > You hard-coded everything? Seriously?? > No offense. But that is the worst ev

Re: [gcj] Qualification Round

2013-04-17 Thread Leopoldo Taravilse
I feel bad because I didn't think of hardcoding problem D-small myself! It was very hardcodeable! On Sun, Apr 14, 2013 at 11:52 AM, Jugesh Sundram wrote: > @Radin Ahmed Ehsan: you seem to be a TOTAL noob to logic and programming. > You hard-coded everything? Seriously?? > No offense. But that is

Re: [gcj] Qualification Round

2016-04-03 Thread 'Pablo Heiber' via Google Code Jam
Hi, It varies each year. When the contest start, you will be able to see the minimum score required to advance in your dashboard, right next to the title. Best, Pablo On Sun, Apr 3, 2016 at 8:17 PM, Mahady Pial wrote: > What should be my minimum rank in the Qualification Round of Code Jam 2016

Re: [gcj] Qualification Round

2016-04-04 Thread Paul Smith
The rank isn't normally used in the qualification round, just the raw score. Often it has been along the lines of "completely solve one question" to advance to the next round, but do read the requirements carefully when the round begins to check that's really the case. On Mon, 4 Apr 2016 at 04:47

[gcj] Qualification round 2017

2017-04-09 Thread Saviour of Satan
the question are too tough more than the last year's -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Code Jam" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to google-code+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to

[gcj] Qualification round - Indicium

2020-04-06 Thread Amogh Kamath
I understand (partially, as you'll see) the solution provided in analysis section of the problem. During the contest, I understood that traces of the form " ... AABC for some A, B, C (not necessarily all different)" will bear a solution. But I wasn't sure if greedily selecting the elements w

[gcj] Qualification Round 2014 - Confirmation

2014-04-12 Thread Amit Joshi
Hi, I am a first timer here and hence the question. My score reads 25 points on the Scoreboard. Is that a good enough confirmation that I have made it to Round 1 or do I need to wait for a communication from the Code Jam Team? Thanks and regards, ASJ -- You received this message because you

[gcj] Qualification Round Contest Analysis

2014-04-16 Thread Satyajit Bhadange
Why there is no contest analysis for qualification round 2014 ? GCJ team is never this late to put contest analysis. Thanks & Regards, *Satyajit Bhadange* -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Code Jam" group. To unsubscribe from this group and s

[gcj] Qualification round points needed?

2017-04-09 Thread Stefan Pochmann
The terms say "If you earn a minimum number of points during the qualification round, which will be displayed on the Contest website, you will advance to Round 1 of Code Jam." When and where will that number of points be displayed? Am I supposed to crawl+read the entire website in order to hope

[gcj] Qualification Round 2019: Cryptopangrams

2019-04-08 Thread Ronald van Loon
Hi all, after reviewing the analysis of the problem on the website, and having had my aha! moment that if you have AB BC CD DE that gcd(AB,BC) = B, I thought I would give my own analysis, because the one from Google seems a bit too complicated. All the Runtime Errors seem to stem from the fact

Re: [gcj] Qualification round - Indicium

2020-04-07 Thread Paul Smith
I don't know how Hall's Marriage Theorem relates to the problem, but here is an example of what the theorem means. We have 2 groups, and we're trying to match them Group A tells us what in group B they would be satisfied with Group B tells us what in group A they would be satisfied with Lets say

[gcj] Qualification round - penalty points?

2009-09-02 Thread lets_code_again
Hi, Is there any penalty points (for wrong solution) in Qualification round also? Thanks. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "google-codejam" group. To post to this group, send email to google-code@googl

Re: [gcj] Qualification Round 2014 - Confirmation

2014-04-12 Thread Luke Pebody
If you did not break the rules, it is very likely that you will advance to Round 1 if you have 25 points. On Sun, Apr 13, 2014 at 3:18 AM, Amit Joshi wrote: > Hi, > > I am a first timer here and hence the question. > > My score reads 25 points on the Scoreboard. Is that a good enough > confirma

Re: [gcj] Qualification Round Contest Analysis

2014-04-16 Thread Bartholomew Furrow
You must not have competed two years ago. We used to be *way* later. :-) We'll get them up soon™, and email this list when they're there. Sorry for the delay! On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 8:29 AM, Satyajit Bhadange < satyajit.bhada...@gmail.com> wrote: > Why there is no contest analysis for qualific

Re: [gcj] Qualification Round Contest Analysis

2014-04-24 Thread Alex Polozov
On Wednesday, April 16, 2014 1:29:22 PM UTC-7, Bartholomew Furrow wrote: > You must not have competed two years ago. We used to be way later. :-) > > > We'll get them up soon™, and email this list when they're there. Sorry for > the delay! > > > > > > On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 8:29 AM, Satyaj

Re: [gcj] Qualification Round Contest Analysis

2014-04-24 Thread bigonion
On Friday, April 25, 2014 12:50:05 AM UTC+3, Alex Polozov wrote: > On Wednesday, April 16, 2014 1:29:22 PM UTC-7, Bartholomew Furrow wrote: > > > You must not have competed two years ago. We used to be way later. :-) > > > > > > > > > We'll get them up soon™, and email this list when they're

Re: [gcj] Qualification Round Contest Analysis

2014-04-24 Thread Leandro Coutinho
I agree Alex. By the way it should be something they already had before the contest start, and they probably have, so I don't understand why not disclose. On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 6:50 PM, Alex Polozov wrote: > > > By the way, one could argue that such a delay diminishes the educational > value of

Re: [gcj] Qualification Round Contest Analysis

2014-04-24 Thread bigonion
Such a post is just unfair towards the organizers. They organize a competition. They do not organize a course. If you really needed an explanation earlier, you could just post a question on this very forum. I bet someone would be willing to give you a full solution with additional explanation on

Re: [gcj] Qualification Round Contest Analysis

2014-04-25 Thread Stanislav Zholnin
I agree with bigonion. There are zillions of problems with analysis on the internet from all different contests. There are hundreds (around two hundreds) problems from previous years of Codejam with analysis. Also important that QR problems have the least possible relevance for solving R1 prob

Re: [gcj] Qualification Round Contest Analysis

2014-04-26 Thread Vexorian
>Such a post is just unfair towards the organizers. >They organize a competition. They do not organize a course. As a competition, codejam is really a waste of time. It is totally exclusive, top 25 advance? That's basically no one. 500 t-shirts? Also a very small proportion and AFAIK t-shirts do

Re: [gcj] Qualification Round Contest Analysis

2014-04-26 Thread Aaron Chan
It's top 1000 T-shirts. Regardless, it's just about the same as the TopCoder open, which also only the top 24 people gets on site invites. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Code Jam" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emai

Re: [gcj] Qualification Round Contest Analysis

2014-04-26 Thread Stanislav Zholnin
Vexorian, The fact that there are so many very competitive contestor and that there are some not so competivie contestors (like me and it seems you too) is not problem of Google Codejam organizers. This is just how life is. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google

Re: [gcj] Qualification Round Contest Analysis

2014-04-26 Thread Andres Felipe Ruiz
Vexorian, I have seen you around marathons for a while, and you of all people should know how this works... it's really unexpected seeing someone with the trajectory you have complaining for such things. ASDF On Apr 26, 2014 12:35 PM, "Stanislav Zholnin" wrote: > Vexorian, > > The fact that the

Re: [gcj] Qualification Round Contest Analysis

2014-04-26 Thread Bruno Oliveira
Actually, GCJ does a really good job with analysis publication and the insights it gives... If you're frustrated by the competitive aspect, maybe you can choose a different contest? :) On Sat, Apr 26, 2014 at 8:12 PM, Andres Felipe Ruiz < andresfelip...@gmail.com> wrote: > Vexorian, > > I have

Re: [gcj] Qualification Round Contest Analysis

2014-04-29 Thread Vexorian
On Saturday, April 26, 2014 2:05:36 PM UTC-4, Aaron Chan wrote: > It's top 1000 T-shirts. Regardless, it's just about the same as the TopCoder > open, which also only the top 24 people gets on site invites. Yeah, and it is also a big waste of time from a competitive aspect. Tournaments used to h

Re: [gcj] Qualification Round Contest Analysis

2014-04-29 Thread Paul Smith
The educational aspect of the competition is incredibly important of course! However, I think there's a big distinction here. Google are running a competition which has intrinsic educational value. That does not make it their responsibility to extract that educational value for you. As long as

Re: [gcj] Qualification round points needed?

2017-04-10 Thread Luke Pebody
It is at the top of the scoreboard for the round and is 25 On 10 Apr 2017 4:09 a.m., "Stefan Pochmann" wrote: > The terms say "If you earn a minimum number of points during the > qualification round, which will be displayed on the Contest website, you > will advance to Round 1 of Code Jam." > >

[gcj] Qualification Round Question - Bathroom Stalls

2017-04-12 Thread Adebowale Odunlami
I have some problems with the question C of the qualification round of the contest. I did not find the deterministic selection rules to be consistent with the example given especially case 1. I felt that I either did not understand the question very well or there was something wrong. I wrote the

[gcj] Qualification Round 2018 Trouble Sort

2019-03-18 Thread Ho Wei Hong
Hi all, I am having some problems with my code. I think I have the answer but somehow the grader mark me wrongly. I can't think of any cases that I might have miss out. I be glad if somebody can enlighten me. I placed the link of problem here for easy access https://codingcompetitions.withg

Re: [gcj] Qualification Round 2019: Cryptopangrams

2019-04-09 Thread mukesh tiwari
Hi Ronald, I also have similar complaints about editorial, but it's basically because I am used to read research papers where they specify problem (in this case, the problem statement itself), existing approach (what others have done) and what are short comings, followed by their approach with a bi

[gcj] Qualification round problem - Nested depth

2020-04-06 Thread Avinash Bhardwaj
I prepared several testcases and each one is passing as per the rules stated in the problem. But still I get WA: wrong answer. Could anyone point me out to a possible case where my solution fails? It'd be great help #include #include #include using namespace std; int main() { int T , N ; c

[gcj] Qualification Round bug post-mortem

2009-09-05 Thread Bartholomew Furrow
Those of you who participated in the first few hours of the qualification round may have noticed some problems with the site: a high percentage of the time, people who tried to download an input were told that there had been a server error, and that they should try again. First and foremost we apol

[gcj] Qualification Round 2009 Problem B. WaterShed

2011-04-25 Thread 이홍일
http://code.google.com/codejam/contest/dashboard?c=90101#s=p1 My solution for small input is correct, but that for large input is incorrect. Is there anyone who solve the Qualification Round 2009 Problem B. WaterShed? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups

[gcj] Qualification Round 2013 Problem D. Treasure

2014-03-26 Thread Ca Chen
I don't understand why "1 2 3 4 7 5 8 9 6" is the only answer in Case#1 in Small input? Couldn't "2 3 4 7 8 9 1 5 6" solve this problem? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Code Jam" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails

[gcj] Qualification Round Problems Available on uDebug

2016-04-10 Thread udebug
Hi, All Qualification Round problems from ‪‎Code Jam 2016‬ are now on ‪uDebug‬! See (1) https://www.udebug.com/GCJ/313 (2) https://www.udebug.com/GCJ/314 (3) https://www.udebug.com/GCJ/315 (4) https://www.udebug.com/GCJ/316 If you didn't solve all problems correctly, here's your chance to see wh

Re: [gcj] Qualification Round Question - Bathroom Stalls

2017-04-12 Thread Paul Smith
Very well communicated. The problem is I think your step 4. Iteration-1: oo == S1 : (L=0,R=3,min(LR)=0,max(LR)=3) S2 : (L=1,R=2,min(LR)=1,max(LR)=2) S3 : (L=2,R=1,min(LR)=1,max(LR)=2) S4 : (L=3,R=0,min(LR)=0,max(LR)=3) According to the deterministic selection rules: 1. max(m

Re: [gcj] Qualification Round 2018 Trouble Sort

2019-03-18 Thread Luke Pebody
I don't actually know what language this is. They all look the same to me now. But I think the things in your sequence ls are strings and you need to convert them to integers. On Mon, 18 Mar 2019, 8:00 pm Ho Wei Hong > > > Hi all, > > I am having some problems with my code. I think I have the ans

Re: [gcj] Qualification Round 2018 Trouble Sort

2019-03-19 Thread Ho Wei Hong
it's in python i threw the whole string into 2 list, ls1 and ls2 ls1 holds all even indices(0,2,4,...) of string ls2 holds all odd indices of string sorted them I used the "shoelace" method to compare to the indices before that On Tuesday, March 19, 2019 at 5:03:42 AM UTC+8, Luke Pebody wrote: >

Re: [gcj] Qualification Round 2018 Trouble Sort

2019-03-19 Thread Paul Smith
But they are still strings, so they will compare like strings. Try the test case "1 02 3" Numerically this is already in order so should receive "OK", but lexicographically it isn't, so your code outputs 0. Your code is fine on "1 2 3" So, like Luke already said, you need to convert the things

Re: [gcj] Qualification Round 2018 Trouble Sort

2019-03-19 Thread Ho Wei Hong
On Wednesday, March 20, 2019 at 12:58:49 AM UTC+8, Paul Smith wrote: > But they are still strings, so they will compare like strings. > > Try the test case "1 02 3" > > > Numerically this is already in order so should receive "OK", but > lexicographically it isn't, so your code outputs 0. > >

Re: [gcj] Qualification round problem - Nested depth

2020-04-07 Thread mittal swathi
Hey. I could help you if you can send me the question too, I really don't remember the question. On Tue, 7 Apr. 2020, 6:26 am Avinash Bhardwaj, wrote: > > I prepared several testcases and each one is passing as per the rules > stated in the problem. But still I get WA: wrong answer. Could anyon

Re: [gcj] Qualification round problem - Nested depth

2020-04-07 Thread Avinash Bhardwaj
lification Round 2020 - Code Jam 2020 timeline 3 question_answer Nesting Depth (5pts, 11pts) Practice Submissions Attempt 1 Sample Failed: WA Apr 5 2020, 09:03 remove_red_eye Competitive Submissions Attempt 2 Sample Failed: WA 19:43:51 remove_red_eye Attempt 1 Sample Failed: WA 19:41:01 remove_

Re: [gcj] Qualification round problem - Nested depth

2020-04-08 Thread Paul Smith
What is your output for 2? It should be ((2)) but I think you’ll get ((2)) with your program? On Wed, 8 Apr 2020 at 05:30, Avinash Bhardwaj wrote: > lification Round 2020 - Code Jam 2020 > > > timeline > 3 > > question_answer > Nesting Depth (5pts, 11pts) > > Practice Submissions >

Re: [gcj] Qualification round problem - Nested depth

2020-04-08 Thread Avinash Bhardwaj
Case #1: ((2)) On Wednesday, April 8, 2020 at 10:36:20 AM UTC+2, Paul Smith wrote: > > What is your output for 2? > > It should be ((2)) but I think you’ll get ((2)) with your program? > > On Wed, 8 Apr 2020 at 05:30, Avinash Bhardwaj > wrote: > >> lification Round 2020 - Code

Re: [gcj] Qualification round problem - Nested depth

2020-04-08 Thread Avinash Bhardwaj
The output is Case #1: ((2)) On Wednesday, April 8, 2020 at 10:36:20 AM UTC+2, Paul Smith wrote: > > What is your output for 2? > > It should be ((2)) but I think you’ll get ((2)) with your program? > > On Wed, 8 Apr 2020 at 05:30, Avinash Bhardwaj > wrote: > >> lification Round 2

Re: [gcj] Qualification round problem - Nested depth

2020-04-08 Thread Paul Smith
What about 23? You should get ((2(3))) Paul Smith p...@pollyandpaul.co.uk On Wed, 8 Apr 2020 at 16:52, Avinash Bhardwaj wrote: > Case #1: ((2)) > > > On Wednesday, April 8, 2020 at 10:36:20 AM UTC+2, Paul Smith wrote: >> >> What is your output for 2? >> >> It should be ((2)) but

[gcj] Qualification Round E-Mail for Africa Codejam

2010-03-18 Thread Ahmed Medhat
Dear All, Any one have received the Qualification Round E-mail for Africa Codejam ? -- Kind Regards, Ahmed M. Osman a.medhat...@gmail.com Egypt -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "google-codejam" group. To post to this group, send email to google-c...

Re: [gcj] Qualification Round 2009 Problem B. WaterShed

2011-04-25 Thread Rahul Gulati
You can download the solutions of the contestants. On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 8:44 AM, 이홍일 wrote: > http://code.google.com/codejam/contest/dashboard?c=90101#s=p1 > > My solution for small input is correct, but that for large input is > incorrect. > > Is there anyone who solve the Qualification Rou

Re: [gcj] Qualification Round 2009 Problem B. WaterShed

2011-04-28 Thread Jeroen van Erp
Not the nicest one, but I have a solution for you, which solves both the large and small problems: https://github.com/hierynomus/google-code-jam/blob/master/scala/src/main/scala/nl/javadude/scalajam/gcj09/qualify/Watersheds.scala Regards, Jeroen On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 5:14 AM, 이홍일 wrote: > htt

Re: [gcj] Qualification Round 2009 Problem B. WaterShed

2011-05-02 Thread Luke Pebody
At http://www.go-hero.net/jam/09/solutions you can download solutions in your choice of language from: C C# C++ Haskell Java PHP Pascal Perl Python Ruby Groovy Javascript Lisp MATLAB Ocaml Objective-C Scala Scheme Visual Basic ActionScript Boo Clean Clojure D Eiffel Erlang F# Fortran Lua Maple Po

Re: [gcj] Qualification Round Solutions (was: Qualification Round)

2013-04-14 Thread Wolfgang Faust
On Apr 14, 2013 7:07 AM, "Radin Ahmed Ehsan" wrote: > Last year I ran out of the 8 minutes thus this year I wanted to make sure nothing like that happens thus did not use any loops :( I used loops for problem A with no difficulties--the large input still completed in < 10 seconds. Because the boar

Re: [gcj] Qualification Round 2013 Problem D. Treasure

2014-03-26 Thread Cyprien Mangin
The statement adds, in the Output section: "If there are multiple ways of opening all the chests, choose the "lexicographically smallest" way." Even though your answer would be correct, it is not the lexicographically smallest and it is therefore wrong. This wording actually ensures that there is

Re: [gcj] Qualification Round 2013 Problem D. Treasure

2014-03-27 Thread Ca Chen
On Thursday, March 27, 2014 1:05:30 AM UTC+8, Cygin wrote: > The statement adds, in the Output section: "If there are multiple ways of > opening all the chests, choose the "lexicographically smallest" way." > > Even though your answer would be correct, it is not the lexicographically > smallest

Re: [gcj] Qualification Round Problems Available on uDebug

2016-04-11 Thread 'Pablo Heiber' via Google Code Jam
Hey, The multiple output problems (3 and 4) also say "Single Output Problem" in the problem type space. Is that intentional? Best, Pablo On Sun, Apr 10, 2016 at 9:25 AM, wrote: > Hi, > > All Qualification Round problems from ‪‎Code Jam 2016‬ are now on > ‪uDebug‬! See > > (1) https://www.udebu

Re: [gcj] Qualification Round Problems Available on uDebug

2016-04-11 Thread Vinit Shah
Hi Pablo, The multiple output problems (3 and 4) also say "Single Output Problem" in > the problem type space. Is that intentional? > ​Sorry about that. No, that was a slip on my part. I've fixed this now https://www.udebug.com/GCJ/315 and https://www.udebug.com/GCJ/316 Thank you for pointing

[gcj] Qualification Round - number of questions to attempt

2018-03-17 Thread Eraj Sri Chandrasekera
How many questions should I complete/pass at the qualification round in order to advance to the next ? FAQ says it will be mentioned at contest time, but from past year contests can you let me know, how many problems I should target to complete at the minimum ? -- You received this message be

[gcj] Qualification Round 2018 Trouble Sort RunTime Error

2019-03-20 Thread Παυλος Τιριτιρης
Here is my code in C++ i tried a lot and i didn't find anything , i would appreciate if someone finds where the error is. #pragma GCC optimize "O3,inline" #include #include #include #include using namespace std; int checkSort(int *even,int *odd,int len){ int i=0; while(i<(len-1

Re: [gcj] Qualification Round E-Mail for Africa Codejam

2010-03-18 Thread phars alnmr
No ,I didn't received any E-mails but I think it will be sent in Saturday 2010/3/18 Ahmed Medhat > Dear All, > Any one have received the Qualification Round E-mail for Africa Codejam ? > > -- > Kind Regards, > > Ahmed M. Osman > a.medhat...@gmail.com > Egypt > > -- > You received this message be

Re: [gcj] Qualification Round E-Mail for Africa Codejam

2010-03-18 Thread alameen
no, i didnt get any too. cheers. On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 6:29 PM, phars alnmr wrote: > No ,I didn't received any E-mails but I think it will be sent in Saturday > > 2010/3/18 Ahmed Medhat > >> Dear All, >> Any one have received the Qualification Round E-mail for Africa Codejam ? >> >> -- >> Kin

Re: [gcj] Qualification Round E-Mail for Africa Codejam

2010-03-18 Thread ruan xi
not yet On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 8:41 PM, Ahmed Medhat wrote: > Dear All, > Any one have received the Qualification Round E-mail for Africa Codejam ? > > -- > Kind Regards, > > Ahmed M. Osman > a.medhat...@gmail.com > Egypt > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Goog

[gcj] Qualification Round 2012: Problem A. Speaking in Tongues

2014-04-06 Thread Amit Thakur
Hello! I attempted Qualification Round 2012: Problem A. Speaking in Tongues. Here is the code with output: https://ideone.com/WtSxtd The output is quite expected, but I am getting "Incorrect" response. Could you help me to find out the bug? I am newbie in competitive programming. :-) -- You

Re: [gcj] Qualification Round - number of questions to attempt

2018-03-17 Thread Bartholomew Furrow
In some years it's been one problem, in some two, but you won't know which points you got for invisible data sets until the end of the round. Typically in past years, successfully completing all of the small input sets (now visible datasets) has been enough. On Sat, Mar 17, 2018 at 2:08 PM Eraj Sr

Re: [gcj] Qualification Round 2018 Trouble Sort RunTime Error

2019-03-20 Thread Luke Pebody
You seem to be assuming all the integers are single digits. On Wed, 20 Mar 2019, 5:29 pm Παυλος Τιριτιρης Here is my code in C++ i tried a lot and i didn't find anything , i would > appreciate if someone finds where the error is. > > > #pragma GCC optimize "O3,inline" > #include > #include > #i

Re: [gcj] Qualification Round 2018 Trouble Sort RunTime Error

2019-03-20 Thread Παυλος Τιριτιρης
thanks,i'm so tired i didn't realized that Στις Τετ, 20 Μαρ 2019 στις 7:33 μ.μ., ο/η Luke Pebody έγραψε: > You seem to be assuming all the integers are single digits. > > On Wed, 20 Mar 2019, 5:29 pm Παυλος Τιριτιρης >> Here is my code in C++ i tried a lot and i didn't find anything , i would >

[gcj] Qualification Round Problem A - Speaking in Tongues - GCJ 2012

2012-04-16 Thread Hugo Benicio
So... This is the link for the problem enunciation: http://code.google.com/codejam/contest/1460488/dashboard#s=p0&a=0 and this is the link for the problem analysis: http://code.google.com/codejam/contest/1460488/dashboard#s=a&a=0 Can someone explain me if there is an error on this enunciation/e

Re: [gcj] Qualification Round 2012: Problem A. Speaking in Tongues

2014-04-06 Thread Joseph DeVincentis
Take a look at the first and last letters of the "alphabet" in case 7. On Sun, Apr 6, 2014 at 7:12 AM, Amit Thakur wrote: > Hello! > > I attempted Qualification Round 2012: Problem A. Speaking in Tongues. > > Here is the code with output: > > https://ideone.com/WtSxtd > > The output is quite ex

Re: [gcj] Qualification Round 2012: Problem A. Speaking in Tongues

2014-04-06 Thread Abizer Nasir
I used Kaleidoscope http://www.kaleidoscopeapp.com On 6 Apr 2014, at 12:40, Vaibhav Tulsyan wrote: > What tool did you use to diff those two solutions? > > > On Sun, Apr 6, 2014 at 5:05 PM, Abizer Nasir wrote: > Your output is not quite as expected. > > > > On 6 Apr 2014, at 12:12, Amit Th

Re: [gcj] Qualification Round 2012: Problem A. Speaking in Tongues

2014-04-06 Thread Amit Thakur
On Sunday, April 6, 2014 5:05:49 PM UTC+5:30, abizern wrote: > Your output is not quite as expected. > > > > > > On 6 Apr 2014, at 12:12, Amit Thakur wrote: > Hello! > > I attempted Qualification Round 2012: Problem A. Speaking in Tongues. > > Here is the code with output: > > https://ideo

Re: [gcj] Qualification Round 2012: Problem A. Speaking in Tongues

2014-04-07 Thread Amit Thakur
On Sunday, April 6, 2014 5:52:21 PM UTC+5:30, Amit Thakur wrote: > On Sunday, April 6, 2014 5:05:49 PM UTC+5:30, abizern wrote: > > Your output is not quite as expected. > > > > > > > > > > > > On 6 Apr 2014, at 12:12, Amit Thakur wrote: > > Hello! > > > > I attempted Qualification Round 201

[gcj] Qualification Round Final Status Update - Google Code Jam 2016

2016-04-09 Thread Niraj Kumar
Congratulations to all those who qualified for Online Round 1. best of luck, see you all there :) -- Niraj India Regards, *Niraj Kumar* B.Tech. CSE Class of 2012 ISM, Dhanbad 8377009854 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Code Jam" group. To

Re: [gcj] Qualification Round Problem A - Speaking in Tongues - GCJ 2012

2012-04-28 Thread Hao Zhang
It's a reversed mapping. The hint is 'y' -> 'a', 'e' -> 'o', and 'q' -> 'z'. 在 2012年4月17日 上午5:24,Hugo Benicio 写道: > So... > > This is the link for the problem enunciation: > http://code.google.com/codejam/contest/1460488/dashboard#s=p0&a=0 > > and this is the link for the problem analysis: > htt

Re: [gcj] Qualification Round Problem A - Speaking in Tongues - GCJ 2012

2012-04-28 Thread Jesper Jurcenoks
Hugo. Here is the piece that you are missing, the direction of the translation is critical and is NOT the same in both directions. The translation from English to Googlelese is "o" -> "e" but from Googlelese to English is : "o" -> "k" JJ On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 1:24 PM, Hugo Benicio wrote: >

[gcj] Qualification Round: There is still time to qualify! - Google Code Jam 2017

2017-04-08 Thread 'Chelsea Lax' via Google Code Jam
A reminder to those who have not yet competed: the challenge is on and the clock is ticking, so don’t delay! There are only 12.5 hours left in the Code Jam Qualification Round. The 27-hour qualification round for Google Code Jam 2017 is underway. You must score at least 25 points to qualify

  1   2   >