Re: Changes to HTTP status codes for geocoder XML responses

2010-02-10 Thread Rossko
You should also consider that the distance from any real-world point to an infinitely thin geometric line is unlikely ever to be exactly zero. You'd need to decide what is "close enough", 0.0001mm or 1km. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Maps

Re: Changes to HTTP status codes for geocoder XML responses

2010-02-03 Thread Thor (Google Employee)
Hi Andrew, We agree that 200 is not the most appropriate HTTP status code for these responses, but it does appear it is the response that we need to return in order for developers to be able to easily reach the Geocoder Response code contained in the body. As the Geocoder response code is a lot m

Re: Changes to HTTP status codes for geocoder XML responses

2010-02-01 Thread Andrew Leach
On Feb 1, 3:26 am, "Thor (Google Employee)" wrote: > > This change will roll out over the course of the next 24 to 48 hours. Has Issue 1933 actually been considered? That is, has status 409 been considered as a possible response or tested with "some client libraries"? Or are you simply reverting

Changes to HTTP status codes for geocoder XML responses

2010-01-31 Thread Thor (Google Employee)
A while ago as part of some internal updates to our geocoding service, the HTTP status codes returned for XML responses containing geocoder error codes were changed to more accurately conform to the HTTP spec (in our opinion). We thought this was a "good thing" but it proved to cause more problems