Hi Everybody
Is there anybody out there with successful experience of using GeoXml3 in a
significant deployment?
I would be interested to hear of experiences in terms of
* scalability
* response times
* browser issues
* support /bug fixes
* interaction with google maps apis
Thanks
--
Y
Hi Larry
Thanks for that.
Is that because it's not being used by business or as opensource we're just
not aware who's using it?
Cheers
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google Maps JavaScript API v3" group.
To view this discussion on the web vi
Hi
We have been looking at this geoxml3 as a way to display polygons.
We like the ease of configuration eg InfoWindow text, fillcolor, line color
etc
It seems easier to configure this client side than to upload this to the
server.
And FusionTables dynamic styling is limited (5 styles)
Hi
I recently heard about mapserver http://mapserver.org
And I was wondering if this could be used in conjunction with google maps?
For example we have investigated different ways of displaying regions on a
map (polygons) dynamically
First we tried Google Fusion Tables but ran into limitatio
Hi
I recently heard about mapserver http://mapserver.org
And I was wondering if this could be used in conjunction with google maps?
For example we have investigated different ways of displaying regions on a
map (polygons) dynamically
First we tried Google Fusion Tables but ran into limitatio
Then for original question:
>>>So we can have a single layer with 20+ polygons and style each polygon
differently.
the answer is no.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google Maps JavaScript API v3" group.
To post to this group, send email to google
Gentle nudge...
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google Maps JavaScript API v3" group.
To post to this group, send email to google-maps-js-api-v3@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
google-maps-js-api-v3+unsubscr...@google
This looks similar to the URL length problem in fusion tables (issue 332) :
maybe you can confirm?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google Maps JavaScript API v3" group.
To post to this group, send email to google-maps-js-api-v3@googlegroups.com.
T
Chris
I have tried this but it only seems to work for 4 queries eg in the example
below I have commented out two "where polygonOptions"
This means D = 06 works
But if I remove the comment for '01' then '06' stops working ;(
layer = new google.maps.FusionTablesLayer({
query: {
Hi Chris
Sorry. I see now what you mean about dynamic styling.
So we can have a single layer with 20+ polygons and style each polygon
differently.
as shown below. But can we style based on some local set of values ie not
column in the fusion table?
query: {
select: 'geometry',
from:
Hi Chris
Thanks for the reply. Yes we are using Google Fusion Tables Layers but in
the 3.5 Maps release the number of layers was restricted to just 5 !!!
That was partly what prompted this question because if previously we could
obtain 20 Fusion layers and now we can only obtain 5 layers then
There doesn't seem to be much up-take in my question so maybe I should
re-phrase:
I'm using precooked colored kml layers (red, orange, yellow, green, blue,
indigo, violet) because parsing the polygon data on the browser would take
forever
the polygon data is approx 30 MB in total.
This has the
Hi
We have a requirement to display some regions color coded in a map.
We have noticed that by keeping the polygon KML on a public server we get
fast response/ high performance.
(our kml in total is about 20Mbytes so drawing with geoxml3 is not an
option)
We can do this with FusionTablesLa
Hi
I have run into a problem with the maximum number of fusion tables layers I
can have in one map.
I appears to be the max length of the URL
It means I have only managed to get 15 layers but I need to have 25 layers
Has anyone encountered this problem and what workarounds are possible?
Than
14 matches
Mail list logo
