[Google Maps API v3] Re: Benefits of using geoxml3

2010-11-20 Thread geocode...@gmail.com
On Nov 20, 7:31 am, niepere wrote: > In my case kmlLayer not render fast, but geoxml3 yes. > I have only markers on my map, not gpolylines or gpolygons. It's > normal? For simple kml perhaps. geoxml3 renders the markers locally (in the browser), kmlLayers sends the kml to google's servers for pr

[Google Maps API v3] Re: Benefits of using geoxml3

2010-11-20 Thread niepere
In my case kmlLayer not render fast, but geoxml3 yes. I have only markers on my map, not gpolylines or gpolygons. It's normal? On 20 Nov, 00:11, "geocode...@gmail.com" wrote: > On Nov 19, 2:00 pm, niepere wrote: > > > Hi guys, > > Which are the benefits of using geoxml3 (http://code.google.com/p

[Google Maps API v3] Re: Benefits of using geoxml3

2010-11-19 Thread geocode...@gmail.com
On Nov 19, 2:00 pm, niepere wrote: > Hi guys, > Which are the benefits of using geoxml3 (http://code.google.com/p/ > geoxml3/wiki/Usage) ? > > For me is more fast, the singol icons on map is loaded more more fast > than this solution: > var kmlLayer = new google.maps.KmlLayer("http://mysite.kml?da