Anyone knows if Can I download the google wave server for any site? I was
implementing a robot and I would like to continue with it.
Thanks.
2010/8/5 Raphaël Pinson
> This is very sad news... I do agree as well that I feel Google didn't keep
> their promise as far as releasing the code goes. As
This is very sad news... I do agree as well that I feel Google didn't keep
their promise as far as releasing the code goes. As far as I can remember,
they actually promised to release the full server and web interface that
were in production (the Acme-Wave example shown was actually an example of
r
It's on the google blog
Sent from my iPhone
On Aug 4, 2010, at 10:07 PM, Brian May wrote:
> I am assuming this is serious. Would like to see some official
> confirmation of exactly what this means, maybe on an official web page
> somewhere. For all I know it could be a hoax.
>
> On 5 August 201
On 5 August 2010 13:30, James Purser wrote:
> We have enough of the federation protocol and OT hammered out that it
> is quite possible to build something like the Apache Foundation for
> Wave. If Google wanted to come to the party with their production
> server setups, it would make things so muc
I am assuming this is serious. Would like to see some official
confirmation of exactly what this means, maybe on an official web page
somewhere. For all I know it could be a hoax.
On 5 August 2010 09:11, Ronald C.F. Antony wrote:
> This is a real travesty. To cancel Wave due to lack of adoption i
Okay, Google Wave may be dead or dying however I don't think it's as
bleak as some may make out.
We have enough of the federation protocol and OT hammered out that it
is quite possible to build something like the Apache Foundation for
Wave. If Google wanted to come to the party with their producti
btw, here is the Google blog version:
http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2010/08/update-on-google-wave.html
"But despite these wins, and numerous loyal fans, Wave has not seen the user
adoption we would have liked. We don’t plan to continue developing Wave as a
standalone product, but we will maintai
Hmm :(
On Aug 5, 6:28 am, Joel Dietz wrote:
> http://techcrunch.com/2010/08/04/wave-goodbye-to-google-wave/
>
> Kind of strange to actively encourage development by independent developers
> and promise future code releases while privately planning to kill the
> project...
>
> RIP Google Wave
>
>
To any googlers reading this. Whatever the hell happened to releasing a full
wave server and client like promised at IO? Fedone isnt what you promised.
Maybe if you stuck to your word adoption would have been better.
Predictable yes, poorly managed even more so.
The least you can do now google if
If Wave was dead simply do not justify a note http://techcrunch.com/
Wave is a good product.
If a product is bad no one remembers or mentions it. I think that this
is not the case of Wave
I'm interested in using Wave and making developments using their API
Wave +1 :-)
2010/8/4 Daniel França :
>
I agree
I gave up some projects for wave cause missing API and features.
and no company will adopt that without the federation protocol working.
and how about the speed? why long time after wave is still really slow? is
this the XML protocol (it is XML, right?), the client? I don't know, but
when I
I pray none of you took any VC or loans out for any wave project.
On 4/08/10 7:49 PM, -TJ wrote:
This like a nightmare coming true.
=,{
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google
Wave API" group.
To post to this group, send email to google-wave-
On Aug 5, 1:31 am, Brett Morgan wrote:
> Pretty simple really.
>
> Wave had 60+ engineers assigned. If you assume each engineer costs somewhere
> between 100k and 250k total spend (salary, office space, airfares, accom,
> shares, ...), then you are looking at somewhere between $6M and $20M a year
This like a nightmare coming true.
=,{
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google Wave API" group.
To post to this group, send email to google-wave-...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
google-wave-api+unsubscr...@googlegr
Pretty simple really.
Wave had 60+ engineers assigned. If you assume each engineer costs somewhere
between 100k and 250k total spend (salary, office space, airfares, accom,
shares, ...), then you are looking at somewhere between $6M and $20M a year
in project cost. Plus servers, bandwidth, etc, et
Wait...
What's going on?!?!?!?!?
GOOGLE WAVE IS GOING DOWN
GOOGLE IS DUMPING GOOGLE WAVE!??!?!?!?!?!?!??!?!
WHAT
I DON'T GET IT!!
CAN SOMEONE EXPLAIN??
--
You received this message because you are subsc
This is a real travesty. To cancel Wave due to lack of adoption is pretty
short-sighted.
Wave wasn't fully developed, it needed better integration with legacy tools
like e-mail, and it needed a fully functional open sourced platform such that
federation would be possible. Without these, to hope
Rest In Peace, and how she will be missed.
On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 8:43 AM, Hemant Shah wrote:
> This is indeed a disappointing news.
>
> We had started researching Google Wave seriously with the intention for
> making it a potential platform for use as an Electronic Medical Record
> backbone. T
This is indeed a disappointing news.
We had started researching Google Wave seriously with the intention for
making it a potential platform for use as an Electronic Medical Record
backbone. This is both for creating tools to collect clinical data and
to develop systems that are knowledge-base
http://techcrunch.com/2010/08/04/wave-goodbye-to-google-wave/
Kind of strange to actively encourage development by independent developers
and promise future code releases while privately planning to kill the
project...
RIP Google Wave
Jd / CEO / titaniainc.com
--
You received this message beca
finally find my way with the sample code I found
On Aug 4, 2:44 pm, Léo SEI wrote:
> Ok thanks,
> but I've problems with those annotation;
>
> let's say I have generated a id called "bid" and my blip is called
> "blip"
>
> i've tried
>
> blip.annotions=Annotation("bid",bid) //don't know what star
Ok thanks,
but I've problems with those annotation;
let's say I have generated a id called "bid" and my blip is called
"blip"
i've tried
blip.annotions=Annotation("bid",bid) //don't know what start and end
are for..?
or blip.annotations["bid"]=bid
but none of those works.. what is the simple w
If you want to authenticate a user to Google docs, then your app will need
to use OAuth to have the user grant access to your app for the Google docs
data, and then store that token for your robot to use.
The common way to do this is for a robot to embed a gadget that asks for the
authorization, a
23 matches
Mail list logo
