Re: Customize Hosted-mode browser

2008-10-12 Thread श्री
would you mind sharing how you got it working On Sep 10, 9:26 pm, Thad [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've been using OOPHM onLinuxwith Firefox 3.0.1 for about a week now and I'm generally happy with the results.  I had some initial problems converting one project over when I missed one of

Re: Customize Hosted-mode browser

2008-10-12 Thread श्री
i got it working and i have listed the steps in my blog with screenshot http://slashgnu.blogspot.com/2008/10/gwt-hosted-mode-in-firefoxlinux.html - sree On Oct 12, 10:48 am, (श्री) GNU Yoga [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: would you mind sharing how you got it working On Sep 10, 9:26 pm, Thad

Re: DropDownListBox - How to Use?

2008-10-12 Thread Isaac Truett
Kevin, What happens when you select apple or banana is that an event is fired. You can add an event handler to the list box to process that event and react in any way you wish, such as by updating the displayed text. As I recall you were looking for a way to display images in a list box. In your

Re: Module inheritance problem

2008-10-12 Thread gregor
Are your source files (the .java ones) included in proxxiClient jar? If not include them and you should be good to go. It won't work if they're not. On Oct 12, 12:49 am, marcelo melo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've just found something interesting... This is the output of Searching for

Re: Most efficient way to transfer larger amounts of data via RPC?

2008-10-12 Thread gregor
Hi Matt, I've just checked an example XML file I have to hand (standardjbosscmp- jdbc.xml) which is 115k. This comprises about 50 screen-fulls of XML data. I think that probably qualifies as an excessive payload for a single GWT RPC call. I suspect the reason it's slow is because the

Interfacing with Cometd?

2008-10-12 Thread markww
Hi, I was looking to create a chat server using continuations, and came across Cometd, a framework which already provides a scalable continuation based messaging system. I don't think we can mix it with GWT server-side though, as its servlet interface exposes the 'service' method: void

setting an image to have a transparent background? (.getElement().setAttribute(style, .....)

2008-10-12 Thread darkflame
I'm trying to make a standard image have a code-dependant uniform transparency background, and for it to work across all browsers. Doing this in css is easy, and works, but GWT seems to not be having it. I'm using simply; temp.getElement().setAttribute(style, filter: alpha(opacity=65); opacity:

Re: Animation Framework

2008-10-12 Thread darkflame
I notice in the demo a little problem when you toggle slidedown first, then orbit. Apart from that, good work! On Oct 11, 11:17 pm, Jacob [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: For anyone who wants animations, and doesn't want to have to just plug in javascript animation libraries, I've just finished an

Re: setting an image to have a transparent background? (.getElement().setAttribute(style, .....)

2008-10-12 Thread darkflame
That method worked, I wasnt aware of that method of doing it. Cheers! :) My own method, incidently, always worked in Firefox, and firebug simply showed opacity: 0.65; for the style, without the alpha(opacity=65); for IE present at all. On Oct 13, 2:10 am, Paul Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Re: EASYMOCK or JMOCK?

2008-10-12 Thread Arthur Kalmenson
Hey Ray, I never heard of a mocking utility in GWT and I can't seem to find it here: http://google-web-toolkit.googlecode.com/svn/javadoc/1.5/index.html?overview-summary.html. Is it in the trunk maybe? This would be a real help because right now I use interfaces to avoid having to use

Re: Animation Framework

2008-10-12 Thread Jacob
I've heard that the demo site doesn't work in IE, so if you have problems, try Firefox, or Opera, or Safari. I'm not sure yet where the fault lies, because all that's missing is a bunch of buttons for different effects. So far, it appears that all of the effects actually work in IE, just not the

[gwt-contrib] Re: polishing and promoting the incubator

2008-10-12 Thread Isaac Truett
Oh, I forgot to mention one thing. I found yesterday that compiling the PagingScrollTableDemo caused a stack overflow. The other demos were fine. You might need to bump up your stack (-Xss) or rename PagingScrollTableDemo.gwt.xml so that it won't compile. On Sat, Oct 11, 2008 at 7:24 PM, Emily

[gwt-contrib] Re: polishing and promoting the incubator

2008-10-12 Thread Emily Crutcher
We'll look into that, as compiling seems like something we really want each demo to do correctly! On Sun, Oct 12, 2008 at 10:13 AM, Isaac Truett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Oh, I forgot to mention one thing. I found yesterday that compiling the PagingScrollTableDemo caused a stack overflow. The