On 13 Lis, 16:41, Kyle Hayes kyle.ha...@disney.com wrote:
I installed your new jar and I'm still getting the following error:
This is not my jar. ;)
I checked out releases/1.7 from GWT svn and I compiled it myself. Then
I use whole generated GWT distro, not only new JAR.
If You don't want
Yes that would be great!
On Nov 14, 2009, at 12:28 AM, bmalkow bartosz.malkow...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 13 Lis, 16:41, Kyle Hayes kyle.ha...@disney.com wrote:
I installed your new jar and I'm still getting the following error:
This is not my jar. ;)
I checked out releases/1.7 from GWT svn
On 14 Lis, 09:45, Hayes, Kyle kyle.ha...@disney.com wrote:
Yes that would be great!
http://demo.ovh.net/download/d3c8cd1708cabf4e6bbb24fe2eef8b53/gwt-mac-1.7.1-bmalkow.tar.gz
file will be available for: 4 days, 23 hours, 58 minutes
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to
Just in case someone reads through this issue later - there is an
interesting discussion on using GIN with runAsync() over here -
http://code.google.com/p/google-gin/issues/detail?id=61
On Oct 30, 8:34 pm, Sripathi Krishnan sripathi.krish...@gmail.com
wrote:
I haven't tried it out with GIN /
Multiple modules is the wrong way to use GWT.
GWT highly recommends using a single module. Most of the performance
optimizations GWT does relies on the fact that you have a single, monolithic
module. Plus, as you observed, the time to build your application keeps
growing as you add more modules,
Are the images dynamic (user can upload them), or static (known at compile
time)?
If the images are from a fixed set of images that are available at compile
time, you should consider using
ImageBundlehttp://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/wiki/ImageBundleDesign.
It would take care of most of
GWT is just plain old javascript at the end of the day. Since it is not
possible to achieve this use case in javascript, you can't do it in GWT.
Google Gears (a browser extension) provides a way to drag and drop files and
upload them to the server. I haven't tried it myself, but this
My all application is running in the same JVM
I think you have the wrong idea about GWT.
GWT eventually compiles client side code into javascript. The Service call
is something that the javascript code executing in browser makes to your
server side code which is written in java. Hence, the
If you are images are dynamic, or if you are not using GWT 2.0, you will
have to set appropriate HTTP Cache headers when the image is served.
Could you please clarify - what feature I can use in GWT 2.0 instead of
setting http headers?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed
On 12 nov, 18:39, hugues huguespisa...@gmail.com wrote:
On 12 nov, 13:35, Daniel Kurka kurka.dan...@googlemail.com wrote:
I found a very UGLY solution to my problem (which enables me to continue
working).
I replaced in LowLevelSaf.java public static native void gcUnprotect(int,
int);
My version of IE8 was accidentally set to Display all Websites in
Compatibility View. This seemed to not hurt anything in my
application at first, but later I found that ListBoxes would not
display properly, i.e., not at all. I guess GWT generates ListBox
code for IE8 that is not compatible with
Hi All,
How can we make gwt incubators scrollTable scrollable using keyboards?
I want the user to be able to use up down keys to scroll the rows.
Is that possible?
Thanks,
Parag
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google Web Toolkit group.
To post to
All,
[excuse the cross posting to gwt/appengine]
The TaskEngine sample application (http://taskengine.googlecode.com)
by jaimeyap is a Google Web Toolkit application that runs on App
Engine (http://taskengine.appspot.com) but is especially designed for
use on iPhone.
TaskEngine depends on GWT
See http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/detail?id=4133
and http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/detail?id=4229
Issue 4133 was raised almost a month ago but doesn't seem to have been
acknowledged yet - would anyone from the GWT team care to comment ?
Cheers
Rob
On
Can be that (10.6.1, safari 4) uses 64bit architecture instead 32?
Have a look to: http://kb2.adobe.com/cps/509/cpsid_50983.html
On Nov 13, 4:41 pm, Kyle Hayes kyle.ha...@disney.com wrote:
I installed your new jar and I'm still getting the following error:
==
hosted:
[java]
There are over 100 issues that are still 'New' which were reported 2 years
ago or more.
2009/11/14 Rob rob.a.st...@gmail.com
Issue 4133 was raised almost a month ago but doesn't seem to have been
acknowledged yet - would anyone from the GWT team care to comment ?
--
You received this message
I'm having trouble getting the above to work in a gwt.xml file, as in:
source path=entrypoint /
public path=webresources /
where my file structure is:
src/com/xyz/gwt/myapp/ --
-- entrypoint/ --
-- -- MyApp.java
-- webresources/ --
-- -- MyApp.css
--
You received this message because
I'm not entirely sure what you're asking.
A dictionary is obtained by parsing javascript objects (i.e.,
dictionary types). In your javascript you can parameterize your
dictionaries all you want (as far as I know). As far as something
more elaborate once the dictionary is built, I can't say I've
Great explanation Sri, I just wanted to add that you could also do
both.
In my project, I have two GWT entry points (and about 5 GWT modules
for sharing / reuse), but I also have another 4-5 regular web pages
with static content.
You need to decide the portions of your site that require the
I tend to do this to clear out tables:
while(table.getRowCount() 0) {
table.removeRow(0);
}
On Nov 13, 3:09 am, Jonas joa...@gmail.com wrote:
Thank you so much Paul, it worked 5 stars.
Best Regards
João Lopes
On 13 Nov, 09:59, Paul Robinson ukcue...@gmail.com wrote:
After you
I have (what I think is) a rather large application and the main files
are about 400KB (remember, only 1 is loaded). My browser reports that
these files are down to 100K when gzip compressed over the wire.
That's the equivalent of one large image ... not too bad in my
opinion.
Just getting the basics of PagingScrollTable working under GWT 1.7.1
and noted that the basic for CellRenderer was to use the
AbstractCellView.setHTML() method. Since my data shown comes from the
database, I want to be sure if people enter HTML constructs into our
forms, we don't display them as
FYI, I know that this simple construct will work:
view.setHTML(cellValue.replace(, lt;));
This uses the AbstractCellView.setHTML (since setText() is deprecated)
but changes all to lt; which generally seems to be enough to keep a
browser from ever introducing any HTML/script hacks in my cell
Thanks for all of your input regarding this issue. We were able to
reproduce the problem and have found that it is a result of an issue
within the 4.0.4 version of JavaScriptCore. We have reported the issue
to the WebKit team (http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/50964) and an
update was made but it
Sorry - I made a slightly incorrect statement. GWT 2.0 doesn't eliminate the
need to set HTTP cache headers.
If you use ImageBundle (
http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/wiki/ImageBundleDesign), GWT
will bundle multiple images into a single composite image. Also, if your
browser supports
I get the following stack trace when trying to test an RPC as per the
instructions at pages such as
http://code.google.com/webtoolkit/articles/testing_methodologies_using_gwt.html
.http://localhost:1659/com.webucator.gwt.filmlist.FilmList.JUnit/
getfilms
The development shell servlet received a
I think you should go through the discussion in this thread -
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit/browse_thread/thread/faca1575f306ba0f?fwc=1
--Sri
2009/11/12 Ricardo Cardoso / Gmr rcc@gmail.com
Hello,
I'm getting a very strange situation. I get the following error in
27 matches
Mail list logo
