Hi Daniel,
I think if you do not inject it into a field, you don't need the custom
parser to be registered at all, but I am not sure about that.
I will check your code later today.
Thanks,
George.
On 01/20/2010 02:01 AM, Daniel Dietrich wrote:
Hi George,
in your solution parsing of an
Reviewers: Ray Ryan,
Message:
Review requested.
Description:
This is a follow-up to
http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/detail?id=3946#c13
Any at-rules that GenerateCssAst is unable to process will be emitted
nearly-verbatim into the emitted CSS.
Please review this at
LGTM
A nit and a question, but you're good to go
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/130817/diff/1/3
File user/src/com/google/gwt/resources/css/GenerateCssAst.java (right):
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/130817/diff/1/3#newcode239
Line 239: public void ignorableAtRule(String atRule)
Revision: 7437
Author: fabb...@fabbott-svn
Date: Thu Jan 21 04:26:27 2010
Log: Cosmetic comment change.
http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/source/detail?r=7437
Modified:
/trunk/common.ant.xml
===
--- /trunk/common.ant.xml Fri Jan 15 11:17:28
On 2010/01/21 16:20:28, Ray Ryan wrote:
LGTM
A nit and a question, but you're good to go
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/130817/diff/1/3
File user/src/com/google/gwt/resources/css/GenerateCssAst.java
(right):
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/130817/diff/1/3#newcode239
Line 239:
LGTM
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
Nightly or perhaps less frequent stable snapshot builds is something
we'd like to do for sure. Not sure about exactly when, but it's good
to know there would be an audience to justify looking into it a bit.
On Thursday, January 21, 2010, Arthur Kalmenson arthur.k...@gmail.com wrote:
Hmm, a
developer snapshot releases would be really nice.
We build infrequently from trunk and we currently guess what might be
a good version to grab our internal snapshot from. Having a developer
snapshot would help us when we are looking to grab the latest
version for our internal use.
Chris
On
Posted an article on our GWT + JEE Blueprint, including what i think is a
unique take on our Event Management and RPC.
http://sonymathew.blogspot.com/2010/01/gwt-jee-blueprint.html
Any thoughts welcome..
Thanks
Sony
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
Posted an article on our GWT + JEE Blueprint, including what i think
is a unique take on Event Management and RPC.
http://sonymathew.blogspot.com/2010/01/gwt-jee-blueprint.html
Any thoughts welcome..
Thanks
Sony
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
To add more information I've discovered since I wrote that post, a
modified CompilationResult also needs its set of SelectionProperty
values copied, its SymbolMap will be deserialized and need to be
serialized again to copy it over, and the replacement string will need
to be the same length as the
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/130806/diff/1/2
File dev/core/src/com/google/gwt/core/ext/ServletContainerLauncher.java
(right):
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/130806/diff/1/2#newcode70
Line 70: public boolean processArguments(TreeLogger logger, String
arguments) {
Another way to do
Revision: 7441
Author: b...@google.com
Date: Thu Jan 21 09:47:21 2010
Log: Add support to CssResource for unknown at-rules.
Include files missing in original commit.
Patch by: bobv
Review by: rjrjr
http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/source/detail?r=7441
Added:
Will update with the final patch shortly.
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/130806/diff/1/2
File dev/core/src/com/google/gwt/core/ext/ServletContainerLauncher.java
(right):
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/130806/diff/1/2#newcode70
Line 70: public boolean processArguments(TreeLogger
101 - 114 of 114 matches
Mail list logo
