Nightly or perhaps less frequent "stable snapshot" builds is something we'd like to do for sure. Not sure about exactly when, but it's good to know there would be an audience to justify looking into it a bit.
On Thursday, January 21, 2010, Arthur Kalmenson <arthur.k...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hmm, a nightly build sounds like a cool idea, I wouldn't mind seeing that as > well. > -- > Arthur Kalmenson > > > On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 3:28 AM, David <david.no...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Hi, > > It would be nice that the GWT team would release some development > builds once in a while. That would be very usefull at the point where > new things are added to the trunk. This way you can get a lot more > input from the community, since it makes it much easier to use a more > experimental version of GWT. Compiling from the sources means that we > need direct access to the internet, but not all companies allow that. > > As long as we have some indication of what is mostly stable and what > not, we can choose at what point we whish to start using a development > build. > > David > > On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 6:19 PM, monkeyboy <dilbert.elbo...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Thank you John for your explanation. Now I understand the reason why >> you are shutting down the incubator. What I am suggesting is that >> developers should have a place where they can see what new features >> (libraries,...) are being developed and not to stumble upon this new >> features by chance (like I stumbled upon the doc for >> DataBackedWidgetsDesign for example). You mentioned that you send >> emails when you start a new project. What do I need to do to receive >> such an email? >> I think you guys at Google develop great libraries that are perhaps >> underused because they are hard to find. Let's take Gin for example >> (http://code.google.com/p/google-gin/). I think that more people would >> use it if you had a link to Gin from the GWT Tools and Libraries page. >> >> Regards. >> >> On Jan 20, 5:29 pm, John LaBanca <jlaba...@google.com> wrote: >>> Libraries and widgets that we want to incubate will be moved into separate >>> projects. Instead of downloading one incubator jar, you'll be able to (have >>> to) download each project individually. Like Ray said, we're going to >>> commit most new features directly to trunk, but we may still want to >>> incubate some features if they are highly experimental. We often setup a >>> design doc and send out an email when we start a new project, such as the >>> data backed widgets, so the community can be involved. I'm sure we'll keep >>> doing that. >>> >>> The advantage of separate projects is that each project can move along at >>> its own pace. The incubator currently has some very stable features, some >>> highly experimental ones, and some deprecated code, and it isn't obvious >>> which is which (well, except the deprecated stuff). With individual >>> projects, it should be more obvious what the state of the project is. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> John LaBanca >>> jlaba...@google.com >>> >>> On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 10:57 AM, monkeyboy >>> <dilbert.elbo...@gmail.com>wrote: >>> >>> > Then, how about a list of new features in the trunk since the last >>> > release. That way developers would know if they should become involved >>> > in the nontrivial (but not too hard) task of compiling GWT from >>> > source. I take the last comment back if such a list exists. I could >>> > not find it. >>> >>> > Regards. >>> >>> > On Jan 20, 4:26 pm, Ray Ryan <rj...@google.com> wrote: >>> > > On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 6:52 AM, monkeyboy <dilbert.elbo...@gmail.com >>> > >wrote: >>> >>> > > > Hello John. >>> >>> > > > I'm glad to see that PagingScrollTable will make it to the GWT trunk. >>> > > > Even now it is a useful widget but I can't wait to see the final >>> > > > version. I would like to ask a few questions. I am sorry to hear that >>> > > > the incubator will be shut down. I w
-- http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
