I've gone through all the old messages on putting style on this panel
and read
http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/detail?id=4429
which, I got the impression, was supposed to make styles work.
I can't seem to figure out how. Since TabLayoutPanel had similar
problems and I want to
May be com.google.gwt.user.theme.dark/chrome in gwt-usr.jar will help?
On Oct 1, 11:33 pm, Rud rudmerr...@gmail.com wrote:
I've gone through all the old messages on putting style on this panel
and readhttp://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/detail?id=4429
which, I got the
Hello David al,
The SL is also actively maintained - releases are not that frequent
anymore though (there's not much to do) because of the high maturity grade.
David wrote:
Any other feedback about this ?
What's odd is that we are still asking this very same question after
several years of
Yes that's true.
But I don't like the UIBinder stuff that much. There is a lot which I
found difficult to do with UIBinder, so I'll stay with the old way.
Just a personal taste.
On Sep 27, 6:45 am, lalit lalit.bh...@gmail.com wrote:
Cannot this be done with UIBinder in an easy way? Just write
Hello
since there is no toolbarpanel for richtextarea i am trying to make mine.
Everything works except the fontsize.
I am tryng to use this code :
public final static HashMapString, String GUI_FSIZE = new
HashMapString, String();
static {
GUI_FSIZE.file(1,XX_SMALL);
how can I
No, the alternate themes don't help because they all set a background
color.
What happens is my override of gwt-StackLayoutPanelContent is applied
and then the theme gwt-StackLayoutPanelContent is applied which undoes
my styles. I looked at it last night (instead of going to bed) using
the Chrome
I'm not sure if it works for you, but you can set the tag that a
HTMLPanel represents. It's set to div when you don't specify something
else. I only created a HTMLPanel as an em element one time as a test
and it worked fine.
I'm thinking about creating an ul HTMLPanel and insert li
HTMLPanels into
It's strange. I would also think that custom styles would be applied
last:
http://code.google.com/webtoolkit/doc/latest/DevGuideUiCss.html
On Oct 2, 7:40 am, Rud rudmerr...@gmail.com wrote:
No, the alternate themes don't help because they all set a background
color.
What happens is my
I recently tried switching over from Image Bundle to client bundle,
and am not sure if the behavior I'm seeing is intentional or not, so
some confirmation would be nice;
a) Is ClientBundle significantly slower then ImageBundle? Specifically
at changing images (applyto). Whereas before I was
oh, and for a visual example of how my switch to ClientBundle is now
behaving you can see the online adventure I'm working on;
http://lostagain.nl/Jarg%20Demo/AMemorableDay/AMemorableDay.html
Note the rollover for the backpack icon.
Compare to this previous, finished, game using the same code,
I use the InterfaceGenerator with my CSS file but the output is not a
valid Java class. The goal is to style all my Button so I
redefined .gwt-Button
Do you have the same issue?
test.css
@external .gwt-Button {
padding: 6px 10px;
}
The call
InterfaceGenerator -standalone -typeName
My CSS file was wrong. I fixed it. Sorry for the trouble.
@external gwt-Button;
.gwt-Button {
padding: 6px 10px;
}
On Oct 2, 5:43 pm, Sydney sydney.henr...@gmail.com wrote:
I use the InterfaceGenerator with my CSS file but the output is not a
valid Java class. The goal is to style
Ok, thanks this clears up a lot of my confusion.
I'm actually learning a lot here. Till I tried playing with ClientBundle, I
wasn't even aware of the data method of injecting images inline into html.
But it does sound like I want to turn on that flag to disable the data
method for now though. I
Okay, I worked out a solution that is relatively painless.
I copied the TabLayout and StackLayout styles from the standard styles
and put them into a file ot_styles.css. I got that to work with the
simple expedient of putting the file in the WAR with the base HTML and
CSS files and adding
LGTM.
I ran some builds and checked the output - seemed fine and I didn't
notice any impact on build times. I also scoured these types myself to
look for other places to save and didn't find any others.
I'll keep StringInterner in the back of my mind.
Thanks for the details, it gives me a better understanding of what's
going on such that I know where to look.
I notices that issue 4700 (the compiler errors) isn't of concern
during the nightly build as during the build all sources are correctly
included through the GWT maven plugin (not compiler
LGTM
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/945801/diff/1/2
File
user/src/com/google/gwt/requestfactory/client/impl/DeltaValueStoreJsonImpl.java
(right):
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/945801/diff/1/2#newcode279
What does it take exactly?
If I look at dynatblerf sample, there is an AddressEditor in a
PersonEditor and it just seems to work.
I have the same thing, I have a SecuritySettingsEditor inside another
Editor and when I get the EntityProxy back, the security settings
field is always null. What
On Oct 2, 4:15 pm, Patrick Julien pjul...@gmail.com wrote:
What does it take exactly?
If I look at dynatblerf sample, there is an AddressEditor in a
PersonEditor and it just seems to work.
I have the same thing, I have a SecuritySettingsEditor inside another
Editor and when I get the
If anyone is hurting with this, it's because all values need to be set
to non null before they can be part of the editor framework, unless
you're using a composite
If you're using a composite, the idea is to set a non null container
value like so:
domainHandle =
On Sat, Oct 2, 2010 at 4:41 PM, BobV b...@google.com wrote:
On Sat, Oct 2, 2010 at 1:56 PM, Patrick Julien pjul...@gmail.com wrote:
This assumes that the built in persist method works for everyone and
it really, really doesn't. Now we have a serious chicken and egg
problem because our persist
sorry, s/rc/rf/
RequestFactory doesn't have create anymore, neither does Request,
which is the problem.
I'm more than fine with RequestFactory not having it because it gives
the impression your objects are application scope instead of request
scope. But without create on Request, we don't have
Ah sorry, it's the request members of RequestFactory can now inherit
from RequestContext. Will give that a go
If that works, would be pretty sweet
On Sat, Oct 2, 2010 at 4:53 PM, Patrick Julien pjul...@gmail.com wrote:
sorry, s/rc/rf/
RequestFactory doesn't have create anymore, neither
It's possible to set a null field to a non-null value by making a Leaf
CompositeEditor. I'll update the DynaTableRf sample with something
better than this, but I think it demonstrates the point. The
assumption is that PersonProxy.getManager() returns null in the
default dataset.
public class
This actually makes sense to me but if the composite editor is set or
a list, the framework will still be able to construct those types?
You have
CompositeEditorPersonProxy, PersonProxy, NameLabel,
LeafValueEditorPersonProxy {
But if the generic parameter was a collection, wouldn't the
Reviewers: rjrjr,
Description:
Update DynaTableRf sample to demonstrate Leaf+CompositeEditor that shows
how to work with optional fields.
Patch by: bobv
Review by: rjrjr
Suggested by: pjulien
Please review this at http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/948801/show
Affected files:
M
But if the generic parameter was a collection, wouldn't the fact that
it's a leaf editor prevent the framework from entering sub-editors?
Hence the explicit chain.attach() call. If you wanted to edit an
optional list, you could replace the nameLabel with the ListEditor
adaptor class. Assuming
thank you for the clarification, I get it
I don't suppose you have advice for using a mutable CellTable in the
editor framework?
On Sat, Oct 2, 2010 at 8:34 PM, BobV b...@google.com wrote:
But if the generic parameter was a collection, wouldn't the fact that
it's a leaf editor prevent the
Works for me, and have to say, this is pretty sweet. Also, very nice
touch throwing an exception if an entity crosses request context.
On Sat, Oct 2, 2010 at 5:25 PM, Patrick Julien pjul...@gmail.com wrote:
Ah sorry, it's the request members of RequestFactory can now inherit
from
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/948801/show
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
On Sat, Oct 2, 2010 at 8:45 PM, Patrick Julien pjul...@gmail.com wrote:
thank you for the clarification, I get it
I'm adding a new adapter class to handle this case, since optional
fields seems like a common thing to see and implementing it manually
requires a lot of boilerplate.
I don't
On Sat, Oct 2, 2010 at 9:07 PM, BobV b...@google.com wrote:
On Sat, Oct 2, 2010 at 8:45 PM, Patrick Julien pjul...@gmail.com wrote:
thank you for the clarification, I get it
I'm adding a new adapter class to handle this case, since optional
fields seems like a common thing to see and
32 matches
Mail list logo
