Re: how to test presenter that is activity

2011-08-18 Thread tanteanni
thx for Jukito !! -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-web-toolkit/-/7cXOonXbLFgJ. To post to this group, send email to

JUnit testing with GWT

2011-08-18 Thread Raja
Hi, Can someone please guide me in writing GWT Junit test cases? I'm new to Junit too. what files are involved and what to mention in which file?etc? Thanks, Raja -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group,

Aw: GIN and ClientBundle (Singleton or not-to-Singleton)?

2011-08-18 Thread Jens
Some time ago I have used approach 2) and have bounded all ClientBundles as Singletons. But now I would go with 1) because when you look at the generated source code of a ClientBundle (use -gen path option) you will see that nearly everything in a ClientBundle implementation is static. So it

Re: JUnit testing with GWT

2011-08-18 Thread Adolfo Panizo Touzon
Hi, take a look here.http://code.google.com/webtoolkit/doc/latest/tutorial/JUnit.html For a interesting example take a look to the included file (ValidationTest.java). Regards. 2011/8/18 Raja grsvarma...@gmail.com Hi, Can someone please guide me in writing GWT Junit test cases? I'm new

Re: GIN and ClientBundle (Singleton or not-to-Singleton)?

2011-08-18 Thread Daniel Guggi
thanks for clarification! hf, daniel On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 10:56 AM, Jens jens.nehlme...@gmail.com wrote: Some time ago I have used approach 2) and have bounded all ClientBundles as Singletons. But now I would go with 1) because when you look at the generated source code of a ClientBundle

Re: JUnit testing with GWT

2011-08-18 Thread Raja Shekhar
Hi, i have already gone through that link. apart from the text class, do i need to have any xml file for configuration? i'm using smartgwt library for xpath functions. i can't understand how to debug the error. here is my code: *public* *boolean* isPasswordExpired() { *int* expire =

Re: JUnit testing with GWT

2011-08-18 Thread Alex Dobjanschi
One thing you should know about unit testing the client code (gwt) of your project is that it's *very very slow*. See more herehttp://code.google.com/webtoolkit/doc/latest/DevGuideTesting.html . If you're new to unit testing (or only junit?), then I'd recommend writing some tests for a pure

Acces to annotations in deferred binding

2011-08-18 Thread Adolfo Panizo Touzon
Hi everybody, I have this class: *class Person{* *@Caption(name=Name)* *String name;* *}* How can acces to this annotation in deferred binding?. When I access to the JField that represents the field name, the method *nameJField.getDeclaredAnnotations() *or

Re: gwt 2.3 + spring 2 + maven 2

2011-08-18 Thread Juan Pablo Gardella
See https://bitbucket.org/gardellajuanpablo/gwt-sample/wiki/Home. 2011/8/17 Daniel Guggi daniel.gu...@gmail.com @spring you may have a look here (requestfactory + spring3 integration): http://jsinghfoss.wordpress.com/2011/08/10/gwt-2-2-0-requestfactory-spring-3-0-x-integration/ here an

Re: Acces to annotations in deferred binding

2011-08-18 Thread Gal Dolber
Make sure the annotation has rentention(runtime): @Retention(RUNTIME) public @interface Caption { ... On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 8:21 AM, Adolfo Panizo Touzon adolfo.pan...@gmail.com wrote: Hi everybody, I have this class: *class Person{* *@Caption(name=Name)* *String name;* *}* How

Re: Acces to annotations in deferred binding

2011-08-18 Thread Adolfo Panizo Touzon
O...It works! Thanks. 2011/8/18 Gal Dolber gal.dol...@gmail.com Make sure the annotation has rentention(runtime): @Retention(RUNTIME) public @interface Caption { ... On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 8:21 AM, Adolfo Panizo Touzon adolfo.pan...@gmail.com wrote: Hi everybody, I have this

RequestFactory: Advantages of using the ServiceLocator pattern

2011-08-18 Thread Alexander Orlov
I think using ServiceLocator boils down to Methods that return a Request object in the client interface are implemented as static methods in the service class. Alternatively, they may be implemented as instance methods in a service object returned by a ServiceLocator. what pretty much

Re: RequestFactory: Advantages of using the ServiceLocator pattern

2011-08-18 Thread Magno Machado
I think code is better organized and has better testability if service methods are implemented as instance methods on a service class instead of static methods on the domain classes On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 9:08 AM, Alexander Orlov alexander.or...@loxal.netwrote: I think using ServiceLocator

deployment fails due to compilation

2011-08-18 Thread Vik
Hie When i try to deploy my app to appengine (based on gwt + gae) I see below error. thus, cannot deploy. Please advise. Just to mention if i run the app on local server it runs fine. [ERROR] An internal compiler exception occurred com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.InternalCompilerException: Failed to get

Re: RequestFactory: Advantages of using the ServiceLocator pattern

2011-08-18 Thread Alexander Orlov
But what's about this case: This method is from a server-side entity class that has to associate it's *user* field with a given user (retrieved by its userId). public void setUser(final Integer userId) { this.user = User.find(userId); // this is what I need to do using the static

Aw: RequestFactory: Advantages of using the ServiceLocator pattern

2011-08-18 Thread Jens
Only advantage I can see right now is that you can overwrite methods of a super class, e.g. a generic service method which may not fit well for some rare specific sub services. If you do not need to overwrite methods in services then you are probably fine not using a ServiceLocator. Without a

Re: RequestFactory: Advantages of using the ServiceLocator pattern

2011-08-18 Thread Magno Machado
I didn't understand your exemple. Who is responsible for doing all of this stuff is the requestfactory framework, not you On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 9:43 AM, Alexander Orlov alexander.or...@loxal.netwrote: But what's about this case: This method is from a server-side entity class that has to

Re: RequestFactory: Advantages of using the ServiceLocator pattern

2011-08-18 Thread Alexander Orlov
On Thursday, August 18, 2011 2:48:56 PM UTC+2, Magno Machado wrote: I didn't understand your exemple. Who is responsible for doing all of this stuff is the requestfactory framework, not you I haven't implemented SL for all entities. So I still rely on this static server-side method to keep

Aw: Re: RequestFactory: Advantages of using the ServiceLocator pattern

2011-08-18 Thread Jens
Seems somehow bad to me. Executing queries in property accessor methods doesn't feel right to me. this.user should by integer or the parameter should be a User. In case of the latter a third object (e.g. one of your services or JPA itself) should be responsible to fill in the correct user

Re: Strange eclipse problem

2011-08-18 Thread Sudhakar Abraham
Download the MVP Contacts and extract into local drive. In eclipse IDE, File--Import--Existing projects into your workspace and select your contacts file from your directory. Then follow the options like like finish, next... S.Abraham www.DataStoreGwt.com On Aug 18, 5:42 am, Russ Abbott

Re: How can I create a widget add it to a CellTable and perform some action when it's clicked?

2011-08-18 Thread Sudhakar Abraham
Here is what I did for a similar problem. I added a ClickableTextCell in the Column Header. CellTable studentTable = new CellTableStudent(); ColumnStudent, String feesColumn = new FeesColumn(); HeaderString header = new HeaderString(new ClickableTextCell()) { @Override

Re: Aw: Re: RequestFactory: Advantages of using the ServiceLocator pattern

2011-08-18 Thread Alexander Orlov
On Thursday, August 18, 2011 2:59:43 PM UTC+2, Jens wrote: Of course in this example using a SL doesn't seem nice..but the example itself isn't really nice to me :) Agree :) This is called successively grown. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups

[WARN] In order to produce smaller client-side code, 'Object' is not allowed; consider using a more specific type

2011-08-18 Thread David
When I upgrade GWT version from 1.4.60 to 1.5.3 in my project, I run at hosted mode, I found many errors like below: [WARN] In order to produce smaller client-side code, 'Object' is not allowed; consider using a more specific type Although I can see the pages at hosted mode, but no data can't

Re: gwt 2.3 + spring 2 + maven 2

2011-08-18 Thread Giuseppe La Scaleia
With mvn jetty:run doesn't work. In hosted mode is very slow. Regards Giuseppe 2011/8/18 Juan Pablo Gardella gardellajuanpa...@gmail.com See https://bitbucket.org/gardellajuanpablo/gwt-sample/wiki/Home. 2011/8/17 Daniel Guggi daniel.gu...@gmail.com @spring you may have a look here

Re: RequestFactory: Advantages of using the ServiceLocator pattern

2011-08-18 Thread Alexander Orlov
On Thursday, August 18, 2011 2:43:47 PM UTC+2, Alexander Orlov wrote: public void setUser(final Integer userId) { this.user = User.find(userId); // this is what I need to do using the static way // below is what I have to do when I'm using SL // MainServiceLocator

Re: GWT Developer Plugin for Firefox 6

2011-08-18 Thread Patrick Seebauer
In the changelogs of the svn repo there is “gecko linux” mentioned for r10537, does that mean that firefox 6 is now supported for linux? And if yes for both 32 and 64 bit? On Aug 16, 11:03 pm, Chris Conroy con...@google.com wrote: Jason, Unfortunately, for the time being we're unable to keep

Re: [WARN] In order to produce smaller client-side code, 'Object' is not allowed; consider using a more specific type

2011-08-18 Thread Paul Robinson
GWT 1.5 introduced generics. Where before you might have had an RPC argument of ArrayList bar, you will now have ArrayListFoo bar See here: http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit-doc-1-5/wiki/ReleaseNotes_1_5_Rpc and here:

Re: gwt 2.3 + spring 2 + maven 2

2011-08-18 Thread Juan Pablo Gardella
Nop. It's works in dev mode inside eclipse. I don't use mvn jetty:run so don't make run in this manner. Yes is slow in dev mode. If you use Windows with IE is the fastest browser in dev mode. Juan 2011/8/18 Giuseppe La Scaleia giuseppe.lascal...@geosdi.org With mvn jetty:run doesn't work. In

Re: gwt 2.3 + spring 2 + maven 2

2011-08-18 Thread Juan Pablo Gardella
Nop. It's works in dev mode inside eclipse. I don't use mvn jetty:run so don't make run in this manner. Yes is slow in dev mode. If you use Windows with IE is the fastest browser in dev mode. Juan 2011/8/18 Giuseppe La Scaleia giuseppe.lascal...@geosdi.org With mvn jetty:run doesn't work. In

Re: gwt 2.3 + spring 2 + maven 2

2011-08-18 Thread Giuseppe La Scaleia
I don't use Windows i use only Ubuntu or Mac. So you say to deploy the war under tomcat?? Regards Giuseppe 2011/8/18 Juan Pablo Gardella gardellajuanpa...@gmail.com Nop. It's works in dev mode inside eclipse. I don't use mvn jetty:run so don't make run in this manner. Yes is slow in dev mode.

Re: [WARN] In order to produce smaller client-side code, 'Object' is not allowed; consider using a more specific type

2011-08-18 Thread Juan Pablo Gardella
It's a WARN no an error. You can safely ignore it. 2011/8/18 David lujup...@gmail.com When I upgrade GWT version from 1.4.60 to 1.5.3 in my project, I run at hosted mode, I found many errors like below: [WARN] In order to produce smaller client-side code, 'Object' is not allowed; consider

Debug in client side

2011-08-18 Thread Marko Borges
Hello! I am getting crazy with this! How can I debug the client side of an application. I am using Eclipse in hosted mode and I use breakpoints in both sides but only works for server side. How can I do the same in client side? Thankful for attention, Mark -- You received this message

Re: Debug in client side

2011-08-18 Thread Juan Pablo Gardella
Start the app and then add breakpoints. I have no problem for debug client side classes in dev mode. What's gwt version are you use? 2011/8/18 Marko Borges markoborge...@gmail.com Hello! I am getting crazy with this! How can I debug the client side of an application. I am using Eclipse in

MAC OS Lion: Hosted mode compilation succeed when Service class was renamed to ServiceFoo

2011-08-18 Thread Miroslav Genov
Hello, I'm encountering strange issue when using GWT 2.4 RC1. When I compile my app (from Intellij IDEA) the code is compiled to JS and everything is working like a charm. The problem occurs when I try to use the hosted mode browser. Here is the error that is printed in the hosted mode

Re: MAC OS Lion: Hosted mode compilation succeed when Service class was renamed to ServiceFoo

2011-08-18 Thread Miroslav Genov
ops, forgot to mention the distribution name - ubuntu -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-web-toolkit/-/CKRHWeTeevkJ. To post to this group, send

Re: Debug in client side

2011-08-18 Thread Boris Lenzinger
Just to be sure : you are starting the host mode in debug and connect to it through the http://127.0.0.1:9997/yourApp address ? Another potential reason is you have error(s) before reaching your breakpoints and code execution stops. Could you describe more how you start your application with

Re: MAC OS Lion: Hosted mode compilation succeed when Service class was renamed to ServiceFoo

2011-08-18 Thread Miroslav Genov
Now I just moved the Service class in the parent package ( service.Service ) and hosted mode is working like a charm. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To view this discussion on the web visit

Xpath in GWT

2011-08-18 Thread Raja
Hi, Can someone please help me in using xpath in GWT? I tried smartgwt xmltools. it is failing. Is there any alternative for this? Here is the exception snippet: java.lang.RuntimeException: Remote test failed at 192.168.123.39 / Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.0.19)

RPC design question

2011-08-18 Thread George Agiasoglou
Hi there, I have to run an rpc call before any other rpc call. So far I have managed to centralize Rpc to handle showing loading widgets. What is your suggestion? Thanks, George -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To view

Bug like behaviour in CellTable.

2011-08-18 Thread jsg
Hello. I've created a test case of my CellTable issue as a self contained panel that can easily be imported into any project: http://pastebin.com/Gd1BEREu Basically I have two Date class fields in my row model, a startDate and an endDate. Each Date has two columns in the CellTable (called

Re: java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Unknown proxy type

2011-08-18 Thread PTed
@ExtraTypes works. But I have multiple request calls. So @ExtraTypes can't be used. Also the Proxies don't extends. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To view this discussion on the web visit

Re: RPC design question

2011-08-18 Thread Juan Pablo Gardella
I recommend apply Command Pattern. So you'll have only one servlet listen rpc request. So there you can perform some operations around any rpc request. PD: Check gwt-dispatch http://code.google.com/p/gwt-dispatch/ and gwt app architectures best

Re: Debug in client side

2011-08-18 Thread Marko Borges
Solved! Sorry, it was such an idiot thing. I feel embarassed. Thanks for trying to help! 2011/8/18 Boris Lenzinger boris.lenzin...@gmail.com Just to be sure : you are starting the host mode in debug and connect to it through the http://127.0.0.1:9997/yourApp address ? Another potential

Help needed: Why does GWT Compiler not ignore my own custom annotation?

2011-08-18 Thread Anthony Homan
Hello everybody, I built a @GenDAO annotation processor modeled after the GWTP annotation processors. The annotation works great, and when I create a new com.companyx.shared.domain domain object annotated with @GenDAO, a corresponding com.companyx.server.domain DAO object is code generated for

Re: Using a CellTable with individual Cell selection

2011-08-18 Thread Sander Smith
Is this the only way to do this, cover it up in the CSS file? I can't suppress this behavior somehow? I'm also not sure what you're suggesting, it looks like something got cut off. Which CSS file needs updating, I'm simply using the stock CSS file which has no reference to dataGridSelectedRowCell

Re: Integrating RequestFactory into an eclipse project

2011-08-18 Thread Thomas Broyer
The docs have actually already be updated for GWT 2.4! With GWT 2.3 (and it'll still work with future versions if you need more than just requestfactory on the server-side), you'll use gwt-servlet.jar. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web

Re: Using a CellTable with individual Cell selection

2011-08-18 Thread Jeff Larsen
The behavior is from the CSS. It isn't a hack to remove it. You just need to change it so you're not using the stock css anymore. If you're using cellTable you'd want to edit one or both of the following 2 css properties. .cellTableSelectedRowCell { border: selectionBorderWidth solid

Funny behaviour in CellTable.

2011-08-18 Thread jsg
Hello. I've created a test case of my CellTable issue as a self contained panel that can easily be imported into any project: http://pastebin.com/zDLPKUNh Basically I have two Date class fields in my row model, a startDate and an endDate. Each Date has two columns in the CellTable (called

Re: Funny behaviour in CellTable.

2011-08-18 Thread Jeff Chimene
On 08/18/2011 12:05 PM, jsg wrote: Hello. I've created a test case of my CellTable issue as a self contained panel that can easily be imported into any project: http://pastebin.com/zDLPKUNh Basically I have two Date class fields in my row model, a startDate and an endDate. Each Date

MVP in the Real World

2011-08-18 Thread moongwt
Hi, The examples for MVP usually consist of simple pages each of which typically contains a small number of basic widgets. What would be best practice in applying MVP to pages that consist of several composite widgets ? Should one strive for a single presenter/view per page. Alternatively is it

Re: RPC design question

2011-08-18 Thread Erik
You can run the other RPC call('s) in the callback of the first one. greetz. On 18 aug, 17:43, George Agiasoglou george.agiasog...@newsint.co.uk wrote: Hi there, I have to run an rpc call before any other rpc call. So far I have managed to centralize Rpc to handle showing loading widgets.

Re: Help needed: Why does GWT Compiler not ignore my own custom annotation?

2011-08-18 Thread Anthony Homan
I found my answer. I packaged my annotation and processor as a GWT module and inherited it in my app, but only put the source of the annotation class (and not the processor) on the GWT compiler classpath. On Aug 18, 10:03 am, Anthony Homan tho...@gmail.com wrote: Hello everybody, I built a

Radio Button in celltablet

2011-08-18 Thread jose felix estevez
buenas noches, quisiera saber como crear radiobutton dentro de un celltablet -- Jose F.Estevez H. T.S.U. en Analisis y Diseño de Sistemas Consultor Staff I Tecnology Consulting Solutions - TCS -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit

回复:Re: [WARN] In order to produce smaller client-side code, 'Object' is not allowed; consider using a more specific type

2011-08-18 Thread David
thanks Juan Pablo Gardella, you said it is a WARN no an error, but why can'tno data be retrieved from server in hosted mode, and in web mode it work fine? I check my code, it should be ok, only there is the WARN message in hosted mode. -- You received this message because you are subscribed

回复:Re: [WARN] In order to produce smaller client-side code, 'Object' is not allowed; consider using a more specific type

2011-08-18 Thread David
Thanks Paul for you detail explaination. my model is as below: public class CTableData implements IsSerializable { public String tableId; public int currentPage; public int lastPage; public long totalRows; public List com.compositesw.web.client.ui.table.CRowDatarows = new

How to hide column in Cell table GWT?

2011-08-18 Thread Sanjay Jain India
I am using Cell Table in GWT.In that cell table I am adding these columns. TextColumnDocument idColumn = new TextColumnDocument() { @Override public String getValue(Document object) { return Long.toString(object.getId()); } }; TextColumnDocument

About the obfuscated javascript objects in '__listener'.

2011-08-18 Thread Xu Jason
Hi, I grabbed some DOM attributes that are generated from GWT controls with FireBug, such as '__listener.f.q' which represents the currently selected date of the DatePicker control. My question is, can I take assume it to be always the same name so that I can write some code to make use of it? I

Re: How to hide column in Cell table GWT?

2011-08-18 Thread -sowdri-
Hi, Use SingleSelectionModel or MultipleSelectionModel depending upon your requirement. And refer http://code.google.com/webtoolkit/doc/latest/DevGuideUiCellWidgets.html#selection for more info on adding handlers for

Re: How to hide column in Cell table GWT?

2011-08-18 Thread Sanjay Jain India
Thanks sowdri for reply On Aug 19, 9:59 am, -sowdri- sow...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, Use SingleSelectionModel or MultipleSelectionModel depending uponyour requirement. And referhttp://code.google.com/webtoolkit/doc/latest/DevGuideUiCellWidgets.ht... for more info on adding handlers for

[gwt-contrib] Re: Pretty massive refactoring of FieldManager and HtmlTemplates to make (issue1522803)

2011-08-18 Thread hermes
On 2011/08/18 00:21:22, rjrjr wrote: LGTM http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1522803/ -- http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors

[gwt-contrib] Updates MobileWebApp to use GWT Maven Plugin 2.3.0-1 (issue1525806)

2011-08-18 Thread rchandia
Reviewers: rjrjr, drfibonacci, Description: Updates MobileWebApp to use GWT Maven Plugin 2.3.0-1 - It now honors scope provided - Its is not necessary to clean up gwt-dev.jar nor gwt-user.jar Please review this at http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1525806/ Affected files: M

[gwt-contrib] [google-web-toolkit] r10543 committed - Created wiki page through web user interface.

2011-08-18 Thread codesite-noreply
Revision: 10543 Author: bobv%google@gtempaccount.com Date: Thu Aug 18 08:15:26 2011 Log: Created wiki page through web user interface. http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/source/detail?r=10543 Added: /wiki/RequestFactory_2_5.wiki ===

[gwt-contrib] [google-web-toolkit] r10544 committed - Edited wiki page RequestFactory_2_5 through web user interface.

2011-08-18 Thread codesite-noreply
Revision: 10544 Author: bobv%google@gtempaccount.com Date: Thu Aug 18 08:15:43 2011 Log: Edited wiki page RequestFactory_2_5 through web user interface. http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/source/detail?r=10544 Modified: /wiki/RequestFactory_2_5.wiki

[gwt-contrib] [google-web-toolkit] r10545 committed - Add missing libxpcomglue_s.a for Darwin FF5

2011-08-18 Thread codesite-noreply
Revision: 10545 Author: gwt.mirror...@gmail.com Date: Thu Aug 18 08:27:02 2011 Log: Add missing libxpcomglue_s.a for Darwin FF5 http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/source/detail?r=10545 Added: /plugin-sdks/gecko-sdks/gecko-5.0.0/Darwin-gcc3/lib/libxpcomglue_s.a

[gwt-contrib] Re: Updates MobileWebApp to use GWT Maven Plugin 2.3.0-1 (issue1525806)

2011-08-18 Thread rjrjr
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1525806/diff/1/samples/mobilewebapp/pom.xml File samples/mobilewebapp/pom.xml (right): http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1525806/diff/1/samples/mobilewebapp/pom.xml#newcode191 samples/mobilewebapp/pom.xml:191: version2.3.0-1/version What's the -1 for? Also,

[gwt-contrib] [google-web-toolkit] r10546 committed - removed for respin of 2.4.0

2011-08-18 Thread codesite-noreply
Revision: 10546 Author: mrruss...@google.com Date: Thu Aug 18 08:39:41 2011 Log: removed for respin of 2.4.0 http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/source/detail?r=10546 Deleted: /tags/2.4.0 -- http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors

[gwt-contrib] [google-web-toolkit] r10547 committed - tag the 2.4.0 release

2011-08-18 Thread codesite-noreply
Revision: 10547 Author: mrruss...@google.com Date: Thu Aug 18 08:41:39 2011 Log: tag the 2.4.0 release http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/source/detail?r=10547 Added: /tags/2.4.0 -- http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors

[gwt-contrib] Re: Updates MobileWebApp to use GWT Maven Plugin 2.3.0-1 (issue1525806)

2011-08-18 Thread rchandia
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1525806/ -- http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors

[gwt-contrib] Re: Updates MobileWebApp to use GWT Maven Plugin 2.3.0-1 (issue1525806)

2011-08-18 Thread rchandia
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1525806/diff/1/samples/mobilewebapp/pom.xml File samples/mobilewebapp/pom.xml (right): http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1525806/diff/1/samples/mobilewebapp/pom.xml#newcode191 samples/mobilewebapp/pom.xml:191: version2.3.0-1/version On 2011/08/18 15:34:16,

[gwt-contrib] Re: Updates MobileWebApp to use GWT Maven Plugin 2.3.0-1 (issue1525806)

2011-08-18 Thread rjrjr
Since when? I haven't seen the -1 before. On 2011/08/18 15:53:28, rchandia wrote: http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1525806/diff/1/samples/mobilewebapp/pom.xml File samples/mobilewebapp/pom.xml (right):

[gwt-contrib] Re: Updates MobileWebApp to use GWT Maven Plugin 2.3.0-1 (issue1525806)

2011-08-18 Thread Rodrigo Chandia
According to the GWT maven plugin web page 2.3.0-1 is the latest version. http://mojo.codehaus.org/gwt-maven-plugin/ El 18 de agosto de 2011 11:53, rchan...@google.com escribió: http://gwt-code-reviews.**appspot.com/1525806/diff/1/**

[gwt-contrib] Re: Fix http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/detail?id=6161 (issue1520807)

2011-08-18 Thread rjrjr
Ready for review http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1520807/ -- http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors

[gwt-contrib] Re: Updates MobileWebApp to use GWT Maven Plugin 2.3.0-1 (issue1525806)

2011-08-18 Thread Ray Ryan
LGTM D'oh! I thought that was meant to be *our* version string. Sorry. On Thu Aug 18 08:55:54 GMT-700 2011, Rodrigo Chandia wrote: According to the GWT maven plugin web page 2.3.0-1 is the latest version.

[gwt-contrib] Re: Updates MobileWebApp to use GWT Maven Plugin 2.3.0-1 (issue1525806)

2011-08-18 Thread Thomas Broyer
On Thursday, August 18, 2011 5:55:37 PM UTC+2, Ray Ryan wrote: Since when? Early July: https://groups.google.com/d/topic/codehaus-mojo-gwt-maven-plugin-users/1dJZJVkukGU/discussion I haven't seen the -1 before. http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1525806/ There was a 2.2.0-1 or

[gwt-contrib] [google-web-toolkit] r10549 committed - Updates MobileWebApp to use GWT Maven Plugin 2.3.0-1...

2011-08-18 Thread codesite-noreply
Revision: 10549 Author: gwt.mirror...@gmail.com Date: Thu Aug 18 09:54:36 2011 Log: Updates MobileWebApp to use GWT Maven Plugin 2.3.0-1 - It now honors scope provided - Its is not necessary to clean up gwt-dev.jar nor gwt-user.jar Review at http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1525806

[gwt-contrib] [google-web-toolkit] r10550 committed - Revise CellTableBuilder API. In the earlier version, a Utility class i...

2011-08-18 Thread codesite-noreply
Revision: 10550 Author: pengzhu...@google.com Date: Thu Aug 18 07:20:07 2011 Log: Revise CellTableBuilder API. In the earlier version, a Utility class is used to render the rows/cells. The utility performs various checks to ensure the proper DOM structure. It also appends a cell

[gwt-contrib] [google-web-toolkit] r10551 committed - New requestfactory-apt jar in support of the validation introduced in...

2011-08-18 Thread codesite-noreply
Revision: 10551 Author: gwt.mirror...@gmail.com Date: Thu Aug 18 10:56:20 2011 Log: New requestfactory-apt jar in support of the validation introduced in r10542, convenience for IDE users. See http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/wiki/RequestFactoryInterfaceValidation

[gwt-contrib] Re: Updates MobileWebApp to use GWT Maven Plugin 2.3.0-1 (issue1525806)

2011-08-18 Thread rchandia
Submitted as r10549 On 2011/08/18 16:07:27, rjrjr wrote: LGTM D'oh! I thought that was meant to be *our* version string. Sorry. On Thu Aug 18 08:55:54 GMT-700 2011, Rodrigo Chandia wrote: According to the GWT maven plugin web page 2.3.0-1 is the latest version.

[gwt-contrib] Re: Updates MobileWebApp to use GWT Maven Plugin 2.3.0-1 (issue1525806)

2011-08-18 Thread rchandia
Submitted as r10549 On 2011/08/18 16:07:27, rjrjr wrote: LGTM D'oh! I thought that was meant to be *our* version string. Sorry. On Thu Aug 18 08:55:54 GMT-700 2011, Rodrigo Chandia wrote: According to the GWT maven plugin web page 2.3.0-1 is the latest version.

[gwt-contrib] [google-web-toolkit] r10552 committed - Edited wiki page RequestFactoryInterfaceValidation through web user in...

2011-08-18 Thread codesite-noreply
Revision: 10552 Author: rj...@google.com Date: Thu Aug 18 11:04:28 2011 Log: Edited wiki page RequestFactoryInterfaceValidation through web user interface. http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/source/detail?r=10552 Modified: /wiki/RequestFactoryInterfaceValidation.wiki

[gwt-contrib] [google-web-toolkit] r10553 committed - Edited wiki page RequestFactoryInterfaceValidation through web user in...

2011-08-18 Thread codesite-noreply
Revision: 10553 Author: rj...@google.com Date: Thu Aug 18 11:05:09 2011 Log: Edited wiki page RequestFactoryInterfaceValidation through web user interface. http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/source/detail?r=10553 Modified: /wiki/RequestFactoryInterfaceValidation.wiki

[gwt-contrib] [google-web-toolkit] r10554 committed - Edited wiki page RequestFactoryInterfaceValidation through web user in...

2011-08-18 Thread codesite-noreply
Revision: 10554 Author: rj...@google.com Date: Thu Aug 18 11:06:00 2011 Log: Edited wiki page RequestFactoryInterfaceValidation through web user interface. http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/source/detail?r=10554 Modified: /wiki/RequestFactoryInterfaceValidation.wiki

[gwt-contrib] [google-web-toolkit] r10555 committed - Edited wiki page RequestFactoryInterfaceValidation through web user in...

2011-08-18 Thread codesite-noreply
Revision: 10555 Author: rj...@google.com Date: Thu Aug 18 11:17:07 2011 Log: Edited wiki page RequestFactoryInterfaceValidation through web user interface. http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/source/detail?r=10555 Modified: /wiki/RequestFactoryInterfaceValidation.wiki

[gwt-contrib] Re: Fix http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/detail?id=6161 (issue1520807)

2011-08-18 Thread Ray Ryan
No, but I'm not sure it can be. The error is actually legitimate: you have @UiField Label and you're trying to stick an instance of Element in it, in this case a funny looking one: g:Label... My alternative is to make this error fatal, which means that you could not use binder to render prefixed

[gwt-contrib] Adding integration with m2e 1.0 to MobileWebApp sample (issue1528804)

2011-08-18 Thread rchandia
Reviewers: drfibonacci, rdayal, Description: Adding integration with m2e 1.0 to MobileWebApp sample Please review this at http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1528804/ Affected files: M samples/mobilewebapp/pom.xml Index: samples/mobilewebapp/pom.xml

[gwt-contrib] Re: Comment on AutoBean in google-web-toolkit

2011-08-18 Thread codesite-noreply
Comment by gabriel@gmail.com: I have another problem and I hope you guys could help me out. I have an interface named BaseValue void setValue(String value); void setValues(ListBaseValue value); String getValue(); ListBaseValue getValues(); and utils methods such as int getValueAsInt();

Re: [gwt-contrib] maven source jars

2011-08-18 Thread Stephen Haberman
Is there a script/ant target I'm missing, or is this done with some script that isn't published? If so, could it be published? (To create the gwt-servlet-X-sources.jar that ends up in maven repos.) Ping? - Stephen -- http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors

[gwt-contrib] [google-web-toolkit] r10556 committed - Fix for errors in type checking of GWT LogRecord. The incorrect type...

2011-08-18 Thread codesite-noreply
Revision: 10556 Author: gwt.mirror...@gmail.com Date: Thu Aug 18 10:35:36 2011 Log: Fix for errors in type checking of GWT LogRecord. The incorrect type was being checked for, and the method signature for the instantiate method was incorrect. And the test method was not doing the