Hi
While developing a project I always create some project specific widgets,
that is reused within the application (i.e. a dialog box).
Sometimes these widgets are only used deep within the application and
testing them in the browser is tedious since you have to boot the entire
application
Looks great, and thanks for the contribution. Maybe put a small
headings-only summary in the Google Group post?
On Friday, October 5, 2012 7:26:47 AM UTC+2, gpike wrote:
*Easy GWT Podcast Episode 04 has been
thx i'll try it,
until now i thought normal html works flawlessly within gwt webapp but in
this case i am disabused.
On Saturday, 22 September 2012 17:09:30 UTC+2, Andrei wrote:
Something like this:
myHTMLWidget.addClickHandler(new ClickHandler() {
@Override
public void
can you explain how to use the html5 feature you mentioned?
On Friday, 21 September 2012 16:55:51 UTC+2, Jens wrote:
Have you tried to attach an event listener (DOM.addEventListener()) to
these anchors and call ClickEvent.preventDefault() when you click on them?
That could suppress the
Someone else already explained it ;-)
http://carlosaguayo.posterous.com/html5-history-in-gwt
Also read the two comments on that page.
-- J.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google Web Toolkit group.
To view this discussion on the web visit
anybody has solution for problem described here
http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/detail?id=7492 ?
Instead of design form of UI editor I get this message:
Internal Error
encountered unexpected internal error.
This could be caused by a bug or by a misconfiguration issue,
I started working with GWT images very recently using resource bundles
(where the images are linked in at compile time), and was wondering if it's
possible to build a site with many (millions) of photos or mp3s using GWT.
How does one link in photos at runtime so they don't get cached?
I understand this is a old post and I have same question in Oct 2012. I am
from similar kind of company. Is there anybody who provides commercial
support for GWT ?
On Friday, April 25, 2008 10:59:34 PM UTC+5:30, Johann wrote:
We have a rule in our company that every product that we use in
The data will be served by your server and your GWT application only knows
how to construct URLs pointing to that server data. ClientBundle is for
static data that should and will be cached by the client, so for a flickr
like app you won't use ClientBundle for the actual images but only for
Vaadin provide commercial GWT support:
https://vaadin.com/gwt
Paul
On 05/10/12 13:53, vinayak wrote:
I understand this is a old post and I have same question in Oct 2012. I am
from similar kind of company. Is there anybody who provides commercial
support for GWT ?
On Friday, April
Hi,
in the development of our current project
(Augmented Reality with GWT, the first HOWTO is at
http://jooink.blogspot.com/2012/10/gwt-augmented-reality-howto-step-0.html)
we used super-source tag that works perfectly and helped us in avoiding a
long code 'refactoring' but I am not able
to
Add the root of your super-source folder as a source folder (right-click
the folder, open the Build Path submenu, and click Use as Source
Folder). Eclipse should automatically make the necessary modifications to
the parent source folder, but you might want to check to make sure.
-Abraham
--
Works perfectly :)
Thank you.
Alberto
On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 3:28 PM, Abraham Lin atomknight033...@gmail.comwrote:
Add the root of your super-source folder as a source folder (right-click
the folder, open the Build Path submenu, and click Use as Source
Folder). Eclipse should
You can get support through some of the individuals and companies on the
GWT steering committee
-Daniel
2012/10/5 Paul Robinson ukcue...@gmail.com
Vaadin provide commercial GWT support:
https://vaadin.com/gwt
Paul
On 05/10/12 13:53, vinayak wrote:
I understand this is a old post
Bump -- the problem still happens in GWT 2.5 RC2.
On Saturday, July 7, 2012 8:27:53 AM UTC-7, bkc wrote:
Here is the relevant output from the gwtc target in ant with -logLevel set
to ALL. I am using SmartGWT 3.0 (the current latest release); the error
below suggests an incompatibility
On Friday, October 5, 2012 3:28:51 PM UTC+2, Abraham Lin wrote:
Add the root of your super-source folder as a source folder (right-click
the folder, open the Build Path submenu, and click Use as Source
Folder). Eclipse should automatically make the necessary modifications to
the parent
On Friday, October 5, 2012 10:47:33 AM UTC-4, Thomas Broyer wrote:
Don't do that: Eclipse will then compile you super-source and you then
risk making your non-client code using those classes fail (unit-tests,
server-side, etc.)
Ah, that's true. I'm used to separating client and server
Sounds good thanks.
On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 2:36 AM, Richard richard.wat...@gmail.com wrote:
Looks great, and thanks for the contribution. Maybe put a small
headings-only summary in the Google Group post?
On Friday, October 5, 2012 7:26:47 AM UTC+2, gpike wrote:
*Easy GWT Podcast Episode
Filed an issue
reporthttp://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/detail?id=7714
.
I will keep this post updated on any changes regarding the issue.
Oliver
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google Web Toolkit group.
To view this discussion on
By default it seems to me that EntityProxies can't be mapped with
@ProxyFor to Domain Interfaces, since the Deobfuscator.getClientProxies via
ResolverServiceLayer by the Implementing Class name.. ResolverServiceLayer
dies with The domain type %s cannot be sent to the client.
Generally i
Hi all. I have a GWT DatePicker and I am trying to make this accessible
from the keyboard. I am having difficulty in exposing the actual date
elements in the calendar and I was wondering if anyone has had any luck
with this? All I want really is to be able to tab into the different dates
in
Hello,
So, as many people have experienced, some of our apps stop working on iOS6.
We are seeing ClassCastException from Cookie.isCookieEnabled(). After some
debugging, I found the exception is actually thrown by the line of code:
I'm deciding on whether to switch my team to GWT. I think the biggest
thing for me as the tech lead for the company is Are you happy with your
choice to use GWT?
My reasons for thinking to switch:
-Javascript is a fast and free language, sometimes too fast and free for a
large team. Coding
Do specializations of the RequestContext interface support generic methods
in the following form:
public T extends EntityProxy RequestListT query(String typeUniqueId);
with a Server Interface like:
public T ListT query(String typeUniqueId);
It doesn't look like since our testcase throws an
I have noticed a few mistakes in the section on uiRenderer
https://developers.google.com/web-toolkit/doc/latest/DevGuideUiBinder#Rendering_HTML_for_Cells
- UiRenderer isn't generics
https://developers.google.com/web-toolkit/doc/latest/DevGuideUiBinder#UiRenderer_for_event_handling
-
I have the same problem and this is the only post which is talking about it.
There is anyone who can give me an answer ?
Thanks
On Tuesday, June 1, 2010 9:46:16 AM UTC+2, nMacD wrote:
We're using a custom-built application based on an embedded QTWebKit
browser and would like to be able to
In a word: yes.
You also need to decide whether to use a third party library like Sencha's GXT
and SmartClient's SmartGWT. Personally, I chose vanilla GWT and have never once
regretted choosing GWT or choosing not to use an external widget library.
Paul
On 05/10/12 16:53, Charlie Youakim
So, let me give my take on GWT (and add, I'm' happy).
I use GWT, UIBinder, and JavascriptOverlayObjects to handle my tempting, i8n
and client side business logic code (event bus, writing happy things like if
(account.isOpen()) etc)
I use 100% ajax calls to JSON endpoints.. I don't use
As a team member I'm admittedly biased, but here are a few other points:
- You can share Java code between Android and the web. This doesn't make
sense for UI code, but it does for business logic and maybe RPC calls (but
you have to design for this).
- It's not either-or. You can call
Thanks for the early replies. I also wanted to point out we use PHP on the
server side, and I'm happy with that. I feel like our struggles are mostly
with JS on the client side, which is why I'm looking at GWT.
On Friday, October 5, 2012 11:53:17 AM UTC-4, Charlie Youakim wrote:
I'm
Thanks Roger! Yes we would be building to JSON endpoints as well. Great
to hear your feedback.
On Friday, October 5, 2012 12:50:00 PM UTC-4, Roger wrote:
So, let me give my take on GWT (and add, I'm' happy).
I use GWT, UIBinder, and JavascriptOverlayObjects to handle my tempting,
i8n
The README is out of date. The code in the NPAPI directory is actually for
the Chrome plugin now.
While it might be possible to get this to work, we don't plan on doing it.
Instead I would suggest trying Super Dev Mode.
- Brian
On Thursday, October 4, 2012 6:46:51 AM UTC-7, Galak wrote:
I
So i'd read up on having your PHP services produce JSON, and GWT's use of
RequestBuilder + JavascriptOverlayObjects. I've put plenty of GWT ui's on
front of rails, grails, php back ends etc.
TO note: I love javascript.. use it all the time for personal projects.. I just
happen to like the
YES!
if i had to mess (and i mean mess) around with jsp files, webflows,
generated javascript in tags, embedded javascript in jsp files... i
wouldn't keep that job. javascript is nice for almost logic-less things
like the whole jquery stuff, but as soon as you have to run logic in the
browser,
Thank you Roger. And thank you for pointing out you love JS. I think
that's an important thing to point out. The team has many Javascript fans
and this kind of thing is important for me to know.
On Friday, October 5, 2012 1:04:28 PM UTC-4, Roger wrote:
So i'd read up on having your PHP
Hamster, yes, this was the kind of thing I was worried about seeing in a
year:
yeah of course it's the GWT again
Ha. Thanks for sharing. Good stuff.
On Friday, October 5, 2012 1:12:52 PM UTC-4, HamsterofDeath wrote:
YES!
if i had to mess (and i mean mess) around with jsp files,
I tend to just always start with an index.html, a reset.css main.css, and a
kitchensink.js hah.. and at some point.. that grows.. and then, at some point,
I migrate it to a GWT structure when I feel all the application logic, event
bus handling etc warrants it.
I really like java package
On Friday, October 5, 2012 5:36:26 PM UTC+2, Abraham Lin wrote:
On Friday, October 5, 2012 10:47:33 AM UTC-4, Thomas Broyer wrote:
Don't do that: Eclipse will then compile you super-source and you then
risk making your non-client code using those classes fail (unit-tests,
server-side,
YES.
We have had some crazy requirements that would nt be possible to
implement without GWT.
Think of If it s desktop and Flash is installed we want a Flex UI
otherwise fall back to HTML5. We also need a Sencha Touch mobile UI and add
PhoneGap support for device access
Without GWT we would
Yes.
I think it's the best available tool for building enterprise web apps.
On Friday, October 5, 2012 11:53:17 AM UTC-4, Charlie Youakim wrote:
I'm deciding on whether to switch my team to GWT. I think the biggest
thing for me as the tech lead for the company is Are you happy with your
Thanks for catching the mistakes! It'll be fixed shortly.
On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 4:53 AM, Frédéric Lallemand
thread.el...@gmail.comwrote:
I have noticed a few mistakes in the section on uiRenderer
https://developers.google.com/web-toolkit/doc/latest/DevGuideUiBinder#Rendering_HTML_for_Cells
I am also happy with GWT, working with it for about 2 years now. I like the
fact that I get all the benefits of a strongly typed language like Java
(strong IDE support, Java debugging features thanks to DevMode, static code
analysis) and you get some nice build-in features through GWT like
On Friday, October 5, 2012 1:46:54 PM UTC-4, Thomas Broyer wrote:
It's not only about client vs. server, it also affects non-GWTTestCase
unit tests of your client code.
This doesn't seem right. Given that your client classes will be relying on
the super-sourced logic at runtime, why
Yes. We chose to use GXT 3.x with GWT because GWT has limited widgets, the
combination works well.
-Dave
On Friday, October 5, 2012 9:53:17 AM UTC-6, Charlie Youakim wrote:
I'm deciding on whether to switch my team to GWT. I think the biggest
thing for me as the tech lead for the company
Has anyone tried the 2.5rc2 release with an app that uses the GAE Channel
api?
On production servers and version 2.4, my app has a stable inbound
messaging sink whereas on 2.5rc2 the very same software is getting
bombarded with repeated inbound messages.
-- Andy Stevko
===
If everything
On Friday, October 5, 2012 8:52:50 PM UTC+2, Abraham Lin wrote:
On Friday, October 5, 2012 1:46:54 PM UTC-4, Thomas Broyer wrote:
It's not only about client vs. server, it also affects non-GWTTestCase
unit tests of your client code.
This doesn't seem right. Given that your client
Brian: well said. I'm on that road now. As a commend: I tried block the
client with some dirty sleep() function like the following , and in
devmode, as I suspected, It didn't worked, because, the devmode itlself was
being blocked too
function sleep(milliseconds) {
var start = new
yes I'm happy, and besides the other people reasons, I would like to share
my experience from the point of view of reusing existing javascript
toolkits and frameworks.
GWT let you define a Java API for any existing JavaScript toolkit or
library. The mechanism of translating an existing
Hello Folks,
I m excited to announce the Beta release of our Java API for the Flash
platform: Flash4j 3.0.
In this release we added support for the latest release of Flex and other
goodies like Starling, GTween, Alive PDF etc...
We also implemented a brand new Flex Explorer based on the new API
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I'm quite happy with GWT. I prefer it for the type-safety, good
tooling, and language features that support programming-in-the-large
(whatever that means) that are all absent when working in Javascript.
Being able to debug code running in a browser
I was using Brandon's workaround, but I didn't disable auto-updates. So
when I opened up my Chrome21 to find it was now version 22, I started to
look for alternatives as I didn't want to turn off auto updates for my
main version of Chrome.
What I have found is a browser called SRWare Iron
Hi everyone just wanted to let you know I released a screencast on using
Gin in your GWT application to control the lifecycle of your objects. Gin
extends the features of Guice for use in your client code. It can be
beneficial in writing more componentized code, that is easier to test and
or
It looks like he posted a complete patch almost three years ago. What do we
need to do to get this into trunk?
http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/detail?can=2start=0num=100q=formatBlockcolspec=ID%20Type%20Status%20Owner%20Milestone%20Summary%20Starsgroupby=sort=id=4554
On
Reviewers: cromwellian,
Description:
Make StackTraceDeobfuscator#deobfuscateThrowable public and move it next
to the other deobfuscate methods.
Review by: cromwell...@google.com
Please review this at http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1850804/
Affected files:
M
Just a java doc issue.
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/132806/diff/1/user/src/com/google/gwt/dom/client/Style.java
File user/src/com/google/gwt/dom/client/Style.java (right):
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/132806/diff/1/user/src/com/google/gwt/dom/client/Style.java#newcode703
LGTM
I don't quite understand why it's capturing click events when it's 10x10
and it's 20 units offscreen, but setting visibility seems like the right
thing to do anyhow.
I'd guess that having it explicitly offscreen makes it less likely to be
in the way somehow when using developer tools that
LGTM
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1850804/
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
LGTM
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1850804/
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
58 matches
Mail list logo
